Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Krakowscy pobożni laicy czy begardzcy heretycy? Z badań nad czternastowiecznym Tractatus contra beghardos Henryka Harrera

100%

Gałuszka T.

|

tom 18

EN

Tractatus contra beghardos written by a Chech Dominican Henryk Harrer is a masterpiece of exceptional value for both historians of the medieval heterodox movements as well as for scholars interested in the history of theology and law in the 14th century. The treaty was commissioned by Cracow Dominicans in the years 1328 to 1334. Commissioning the treaty to Henryk Harrer, a stranger expert from the Prague monastery of St. Clemens was dictated by a series of controversies among Cracow clergy around the judgement of conduct of a certain group of people whose religious practices and a way of life stood out from the rest of the congregation. Undertaking the task of writing the treaty Henryk Harrer based his work around three charges pressed against the suspected of heresy: breaking off the Church and establishing an illegal organization (singularitas vite); corrupted attitude towards recognized religious practices (contemptibilitas sacramenti eucharistiae); numerous flaws and perverse disposition (pertinax voluntas). Not only did Harrer decide to comment on all aspects of life of central figures of Contra beghardos but he also honestly mentioned all arguments he was not able to undermine. Despite these objective difficulties, the Czech Dominican was certain that the expertise he came up with was sufficient to link the lay movement with the sect of Beghard Heretics.The author of this study proved that, contrary to Harrer’s keen intention, his Tractatus contra beghardos does not unambiguously show heresy in the Cracow diocese. What is more, the reader, instead of indictment against the conduct of a group of laymen paradoxically received a confirmation of their innocence and orthodoxy. In the light of analysis of the text Contra beghardos, the claim that Beghard Heretics from Harrer’s work turn out to be pious layman, living in communion with the Church, seems to be fully substantiated. Of course their way of life and the practice of asceticism made them stand out from the other members of the congregation but were completely in line with the Church legislation. In this context, Harrer’s work is an original testimony of numerous misunderstandings about the Beghard movement and stormy times of forming a new kind of piety among lay members of Church.

PL

Tractatus contra beghardos written by a Chech Dominican Henryk Harrer is a masterpiece of exceptional value for both historians of the medieval heterodox movements as well as for scholars interested in the history of theology and law in the 14th century. The treaty was commissioned by Cracow Dominicans in the years 1328 to 1334. Commissioning the treaty to Henryk Harrer, a stranger expert from the Prague monastery of St. Clemens was dictated by a series of controversies among Cracow clergy around the judgement of conduct of a certain group of people whose religious practices and a way of life stood out from the rest of the congregation. Undertaking the task of writing the treaty Henryk Harrer based his work around three charges pressed against the suspected of heresy: breaking off the Church and establishing an illegal organization (singularitas vite); corrupted attitude towards recognized religious practices (contemptibilitas sacramenti eucharistiae); numerous flaws and perverse disposition (pertinax voluntas). Not only did Harrer decide to comment on all aspects of life of central figures of Contra beghardos but he also honestly mentioned all arguments he was not able to undermine. Despite these objective difficulties, the Czech Dominican was certain that the expertise he came up with was sufficient to link the lay movement with the sect of Beghard Heretics.The author of this study proved that, contrary to Harrer’s keen intention, his Tractatus contra beghardos does not unambiguously show heresy in the Cracow diocese. What is more, the reader, instead of indictment against the conduct of a group of laymen paradoxically received a confirmation of their innocence and orthodoxy. In the light of analysis of the text Contra beghardos, the claim that Beghard Heretics from Harrer’s work turn out to be pious layman, living in communion with the Church, seems to be fully substantiated. Of course their way of life and the practice of asceticism made them stand out from the other members of the congregation but were completely in line with the Church legislation. In this context, Harrer’s work is an original testimony of numerous misunderstandings about the Beghard movement and stormy times of forming a new kind of piety among lay members of Church.

2

Mater Polonia. Z badań nad oficjum brewiarzowym ku czci św. Stanisława ze Szczepanowa Dies adest celebris autorstwa Wincentego dominikanina

100%

Gałuszka T.

|

tom 85

EN

The paper is concerned with the history of creating the breviary officium in hon-our of St. Stanislaus of Szczepanów Dies adest celebris, authored by Vincent the Dominican (mid-13th c.). The source analysis focuses on some parts of the officium, including the hymn Gaude mater Polonia. The author argues that the officium together with the hymn was writ-ten in the milieu of Polish Dominicans and should be interpreted in the context of thirteenth century philosophical and theological debates.

PL

Artykuł dotyczy dziejów powstania oficjum brewiarzowego ku czci św. Sta-nisława ze Szczepanowa Dies adest celebris autorstwa dominikanina Wincentego (połowa XIII w.). Analizie źródłoznawczej zostały poddane niektóre części oficjum, w tym również hymn Gaude mater Polonia. Autor dowodzi, że oficjum wraz z hymnem powstało w środowi-sku polskich dominikanów i należy je interpretować w kontekście trzynastowiecznych debat filozoficzno-teologicznych.

3

Donos na dominikanina. Studium historyczne i edycja tekstu listu denuncjacyjnego Stanisława ze Skarbimierza i akt sprawy brata Mikołaja z Brześcia z około 1421 roku

100%

Gałuszka T.

|

tom 83

PL

Artykuł dotyczy procesu denuncjacyjnego przeciwko byłemu prowincjałowi dominikanów krakowskich Mikołajowi z Brzezia z około 1421 r. Jego kazania oburzyły krakowskich duchownych, których prokuratorem stał się Stanisław ze Skarbimierza. Sprawa stanowi odbicie napięć związanych z poczuciem zagrożenia przez husytyzm. The paper deals with the denunciatory proceedings against the former provincial of the Cracovian Dominicans, Mikołaj of Brzezie, in circa 1421. His sermons outraged the clergy of Cracow, whose procurator became Stanisław of Skarbimierz. The matter reflects the tensions connected with the feeling of the threat of Hussitism.