Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Nihilizm jako kategoria literaturoznawcza

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Świat Tekstów. Rocznik Słupski

|

2007

|

tom 5

177-191

DE

Der Aufsatz Der Nihilismus als eine literaturwissenschaftliche Kategorie ist ein Ver-such, das Problem neu zu betrachten, indem es, einerseits aus der gewöhnlichen Auffassung, die endlich überwunden werden muss, (z.B. der Nihilismus als eine Invektive) herausgenommen wird, und andererseits, indem die Frage in einen literaturwissenschaftlichen Kontext hineingesetzt wird. Der Autor behandelt aus diesem Anlass sowohl die Ästhetik der alten Griechen (Plato, Aristoteles), als auch – und vor allem – die Überlegungen, welche zu diesem Thema Nietzsche, Turgenjev sowie Dostojevski gemacht haben.

2

Phronesis: racjonalność hermeneutyczna

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2016

|

nr 25

81-94

EN

The paper is an attempt to rethink the problem of rationality in the humanities in the context of hermeneutics. The author argues that this concept of rationality must be founded on the Aristotelian concept of practical reason (phronesis). Phronesis is a need for discernment of the self or rather to find itself in its own, tangible, specific situation. This understanding concerns Being-inthe-world and belongs to what in Martin Heidegger’s ontohermeneutics we can determine precisely as understanding in the hermeneutic sense.

3

Literatura i nihilizm

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2007

|

nr 8

9-30

EN

This article Literature and Nihilsm is an attempt at capturing nihilism as a category of the study of literature. Considerations concerning three questions: 1) analysis of historical disputes (e.g. between Plato and Aristotle) on nihilism of literature (what is meant basically is the relation of literature to truth understood correspondingly); 2. interpretation (among other things, emphasis of Vattim's motif concerning the relationship between hermeneutics and nihilism) and 3) nihilistic motifs in literature (the author is focused on interpretations of nihilism in literature) in Turgenev's oeuvre, and especially in that of Dostoyevsky. It can be seen from the latter considerations that for understanding nihilism, Dostoyevsky plays an original and not a smaller role than Friedrich Nietzsche, who is traditionally considered as the chief theorist of nihilism.

4

Literaturoznawstwo osobiste

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2015

|

nr 23

11-26

EN

The article titled “Personal literary interpretation” deals with problems which have usually been marginalized in literary studies, but which seem to be very important in the context of the humanities, as broadly defined. The author of this article intends to rethink the problem of literary studies not in objective, but in personal terms. This is why the author wants to talk about what he calls personal literary interpretation, which has nothing to do with subjective or irrational thinking, but which is rather grounded in the hermeneutical rule that says that one must believe in order tounderstand a text or the other (where ‘believe’ also means: ‘to love’, ‘engage’, and ‘be open’). The article presents different determinants of this attitude, ranging from Dilthey to Heidegger and Gadamer. Finally, the author subscribes to the theory of personal interpretation, which is always dialogical.

PL

The article titled “Personal literary interpretation” deals with problems which have usually been marginalized in literary studies, but which seem to be very important in the context of the humanities, as broadly defined. The author of this article intends to rethink the problem of literary studies not in objective, but in personal terms. This is why the author wants to talk about what he calls personal literary interpretation, which has nothing to do with subjective or irrational thinking, but which is rather grounded in the hermeneutical rule that says that one must believe in order to understand a text or the other (where ‘believe’ also means: ‘to love’, ‘engage’, and ‘be open’). The article presents different determinants of this attitude, ranging from Dilthey to Heidegger and Gadamer. Finally, the author subscribes to the theory of personal interpretation, which is always dialogical.

5

O interpretacji

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2013

|

nr 20

219-233

EN

The article entitled “On interpretation” is an attempt to formulate a viewpoint on the issue of textual interpretation. It presents different ideas related to interpretation, including especially those that are concerned with a text’s meaning and with the way in which it is interpreted by the reader. The author proposes another interpretation method which he calls transactional. The primary concern is how to possibly justify the fundamental character of interpretation and interpretative activity while at the same time preserving and respecting the relative autonomy of an interpreted text.

6

MARTIN HEIDEGGER I FENOMENOLOGICZNO- -HERMENEUTYCZNE POJĘCIE DYSKURSU

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Porównania

|

2017

|

tom 21

|

nr 2

EN

The article presents an analysis and an interpretation of the phenomenological-hermeneutic discourse based on Martin Heidegger’s idea and understanding of discourse (these are two separate notions). The choice of the topic is not arbitrary. The point is to show that Heidegger’s notion of discourse is also worth applying (and not only the popularised and almost conventionalised notion of Michel Foucault). The philosopher differentiates between four main structural moments of discourse in Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. These are: 1) the about-which talked over; 2) the said as such (discursive what); 3) communication; 4) manifestation. These issues are discussed in the paper in detail. The notion of discourse is not neutral but is always formulated on the basis of some discourse that is a certain way of understanding the world and the problem under analysis. That is why discourse will first be characterised as a way of thinking (the first part of the paper) and only then will Heidegger’s concept of discourse be approached (in the second part). Both issues seem important because: 1) the issue of the phenomenological-hermeneutic discourse seems relatively unknown (laymen’s approach is to radically differentiate between phenomenology and hermeneutics); 2) Heidegger’s concept of discourse deserves a broader audience.

PL

Artykuł stanowi próbę analizy i interpretacji dyskursu fenomenologiczno-hermeneutycznego w ujęciu Martina Heideggera oraz sposobu rozumienia dyskursu przez wspomnianego filozofa (to dwie niezależne kwestie). Wybór tematyki nie jest arbitralny. Przeciwnie, chodzi o to, aby pokazać, że Heideggerowskie ujęcie dyskursu zasługuje na uwagę (nie mniej niż spopularyzowane, by nie powiedzieć wręcz skonwencjonalizowane, ujęcie Michela Foucaulta). W Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs wyróżnia filozof cztery zasadnicze momenty strukturalne dyskursu. Są to kolejno: 1) to, o czym się mówi; 2) to, co powiedziane jako takie (dyskursywne co); 3) komunikacja; 4) wyjawianie/odkrytość. Kwestie te zostaną szczegółowo omówione w artykule. Pojęcie dyskursu nie jest neutralne, ale zawsze formułowane na gruncie jakiegoś dyskursu, a więc pewnego sposobu widzenia świata czy badanych problemów. Dlatego należy scharakteryzować wstępnie ów dyskurs jako sposób myślenia (część pierwsza szkicu), by dopiero następnie przyjrzeć się uważniej Heideggerowskiej koncepcji dyskursu (w części drugiej). Oba te zagadnienia wydają się bardzo ważne, bo: 1) problem dyskursu fenomenologiczno-hermeneutycznego wydaje się stosunkowo jeszcze mało znany (w potocznej świadomości zazwyczaj radykalnie oddziela się fenomenologię i hermeneutykę); 2) Heideggerowska koncepcja dyskursu również domaga się szerszego przedstawienia.

7

Znak i interpretacja. Czy możliwa jest semiotyka hermeneutyczna?

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2017

|

nr 28

EN

The article „Sign and interpretation” is an attempt to answer the question of the possibility of the existence of hermeneutic semiotics. The discussion relates essentially to problems such as sign and interpretation. The author analyzes the selected threads of thought of Charles Sanders Peirce, showing their similarity to the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Gadamer.

8

Etyka aautentyczności jako postulowany styl życia (glossa o krytyce etycznej Stanisława Barańczaka)

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Konteksty - Polska Sztuka Ludowa

|

2011

|

tom 65

|

nr 1(292)

65-69

EN

The theoretical stratum of this sketch deals with the relative autonomy of the literary work. This feature consists of the fact that literary texts are not only language-oriented but also wish to speak about the world around us. The thematic stratum is concerned with questions that proved to be significant for representatives of the so-called Generation ’68. The attitude of the representatives of the New Wave appears to pertain to issues associated with poetics and various ways of thinking about literature (poetry). It became obvious, however, that the controversy concerning the character of literature is not a problem resolved simply by those who write poems but goes much further. It relates, above all, to questions concerning our nature, objectives and definitions of the world of values. Responses to such questions delineated fundamentally the lifestyle of the citizens of People’s Poland: should society support so-called small stabilisation by ignoring the mechanisms of the state and socio-political reality or, as the existentialists would say, the unauthentic lifestyle? Or, on the contrary, should people desire an authentic life, a life immersed in truth? Questions of this sort occupy central place in the literary critique of Stanisław Barańczak (predominantly, his two volumes of essays: Nieufni i zadufani and Etyka i poetyka).

9

Ku teoretycznej wielości (w sprawie teorii słabych)

100%

Januszkiewicz M.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2005

|

nr 5

117-133

EN

This article refers to the problems of disputes over the concept of a literary character and theory (in humanities). The reference to the historical perspective becomes an occasion for the presentation of an attitude which stems from post-modern reflection: the metaphysical (essential) claims are put forward both to the subject and to the manner of studies, they are lifted for the sake of pragmatic and hermeneutic interpretations within this which the author calls weak theories (and the conception of weakness is here in a distinct relationship with philosophical proposals formulated by Gianni Vattura).