Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Racjonalna regulacja karnoprocesowej dopuszczalności dowodów uzyskanych z naruszeniem praw jednostki

100%

Jasiński W.

Przegląd Prawa i Administracji

|

2020

|

tom 120

|

nr Tom 2

83 - 95

PL

W artykule poddano analizie cztery wymogi, jakie muszą zostać spełnione przy tworzeniu racjonalnej regulacji karnoprocesowej dopuszczalności dowodów uzyskanych z naruszeniem praw jednostki. Pierwszy zakłada, że musi zostać dokonana zarówno rzetelna analiza dotychczasowego dorobku rodzimej teorii i funkcjonowania praktyki w omawianej sferze, jak i analiza komparatystyczna dotycząca dopuszczalności dowodów uzyskanych z naruszeniem praw jednostki. W dalszej kolejności uwzględnienia wymagają standardy konstytucyjny i prawnomiędzynarodowy, które kształtują nieprzekraczalne granice swobody, w jakich musi zmieścić się ustawodawca. Niezbędne jest również wyraźne zdefiniowanie celu, jakiemu mają służyć regulacje determinujące dopuszczalność dowodów uzyskanych z naruszeniem praw jednostki. Wyznaczy on bowiem ramy dla rozwiązań szczegółowych, gwarantując ich spójność. Ostatnią istotną kwestią jest kształt mechanizmu sankcjonowania dowodów uzyskanych z naruszeniem praw jednostki, który powinien zapewnić stosowną równowagę w dystrybucji władzy decydowania o dopuszczalności poszczególnych środków dowodowych między prawodawcą a organami stosującymi prawo oraz niezbędną elastyczność i gwarancje przeciwdziałające nadmiernej uznaniowości tych ostatnich.

EN

The article focuses on four requirements that must be met when drafting regulations on the admissibility of evidence obtained in violation of human rights. The first one assumes that a thorough analysis of both the theory and practice of functioning of national regulations regarding admissibility of improperly obtained evidence, as well as comparative analysis regarding that topic has to be conducted. Further, what requires consideration are constitutional and international standards forming a framework within which the legislator must fit. It is also necessary to clearly define the purpose of the regulations determining the admissibility of evidence obtained in violation of individual rights. The latter will allow consistency in drafting detailed regulations on who, how, and to what extent should admit the discussed pieces of evidence. The last issue is the choice of the optimum shape of a mechanism for sanctioning evidence obtained in violation of human rights. It should ensure a right balance in the distribution of power to decide on the admissibility of evidence between the legislator and law enforcement bodies, as well as the necessary flexibility with safeguards against excessive discretion.

2

Jeszcze o autentyczności dokumentu Jana XIII dla biskupstwa miśnieńskiego z 2 stycznia 968 roku

100%

Jasiński W.

Roczniki Historyczne

|

2014

|

tom 80

PL

Nochmals zur Echtheit der Urkunde Johannes’ XIII. für das Bistum Meißen vom 2. Januar 968ZusammenfassungDer Beitrag stellt eine Antwort auf die Polemik von Dariusz Sikorski dar, der eine Unmenge von Argumenten und kritischen Bemerkungen gegen die These von der Echtheit des Privilegs Johannes’ XIII. vom 2. Januar 968, mit dem die Exemtion des Bistums Meißen verliehen worden war, ins Feld führte. Sikorski meint, daß es sich bei dieser Urkunde um eine Fälschung aus der ersten Hälfte des 12. Jahrhunderts handele. Der Verfasser bekräftigte alle bisher beigebrachten Befunde, darüber hinaus brachte er neue Argumente bei, die sich aus der Analyse der Privilegien der Kaiser Otto II. von 983 (DD O II 184) und Otto III. von 995 (DD O III 186) ergaben. Die gemeinsamen Elemente in diesen beiden kaiserlichen und in dem päpstlichen Privileg sprechen keineswegs gegen die Echtheit der Meißner Bulle. Im Gegenteil, sie beweisen gar ihre Echtheit. Denn wenn man – dem Gedankengang D. Sikorskis folgend – die Meißner Bulle für falsch hielte, müßten die gemeinsamen Textpassagen in den beiden Urkunden daraus resultieren, daß dem Notar, der die Urkunde Ottos III. redigierte, die Urkunde Ottos II. als Vorlage diente. Es stellte sich aber heraus, daß man die Urkunde Ottos III. trotz der gemeinsamen Textstellen auf keinen Fall aus dem erwähnten Privileg Ottos II. ableiten kann. Letztere Urkunde entstand u. a. durch die Auswertung der päpstlichen Bulle für Meißen, wobei der die Zehnten betreffende Teil vereinfacht, aktualisiert und ergänzt worden war. Der Schreiber der Urkunde Ottos III. schrieb hingegen zu einem großen Teil das päpstliche Privileg getreulich ab und ließ die Vereinfachungen, Aktualisierungen und Ergänzungen, die im Privileg Ottos II. gemacht worden waren, gänzlich weg. Die gemeinsamen Textpassagen in den Urkunden Ottos II. und Ottos III. entstanden also aufgrund einer gemeinsamen Vorlage, des päpstlichen Privilegs für Meißen. Der Verfasser zeigte ebenfalls auf, daß die inhaltlichen Unterschiede zwischen der Urkunde Ottos III. von 995 und der päpstlichen Bulle von 968 ebenfalls für die Echtheit dieses Privilegs sprechen. More on the authenticity of John XIII’s document of 2 January 968 for the bishopric of MeissenAbstractThe paper is a response to the polemic by Dariusz Sikorski, who put forward a number of arguments against the thesis about the authenticity of John XIII’s bull of 2 January 968, which founded an exempted bishopric in Meissen. Sikorski believes that the document is a forgery produced in the first half of the 12th century. This response to the polemic is divided into three parts: the first one lists examples showing that Sikorski’s objections are unreliable; in the second part the most important arguments for the authenticity of the papal document are defended once again; the third one presents new proofs for the same thesis. The authors also draws attention to the similarity of the bull to the imperial documents of Otto II of 983 (DD O II 184) and Otto III of 995 (DD O III 186), and arguments that they do not contradict its authenticity but – quite to the contrary – confirm that authenticity, because the authors of the imperial documents used the text of the bull, not vice versa. Therefore, there is no reason to question the authenticity of the papal document of 968.

3

Magnae Moraviae Fontes Historici. I: Annales et chronice / Prameny k dějinám Velké Moravy. I: Letopisy a kroniky, ed. Dagmar Bartoňková, David Kalhous, Jiří K. Kroupa, Zdeněk Měřínský, Anna Žáková, Koniasch Latin Press, Praha 2019, ss. XXII + 506, III wyd

100%

Jasiński W.

|

2021

|

nr 3 (30)

338-340

4

W kwestii zasadności uregulowania katalogu stron postępowania w przedmiocie odszkodowania za niesłuszne pozbawienie wolności

100%

Jasiński W.

Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny

|

2021

|

tom 83

|

nr 1

47-59

EN

The aim of the article is to critically assess the regulations introduced by the Act of 19 July 2019 amending the Code of Criminal Procedure and some other acts specifying the catalogue of parties in cases of compensation for wrongful conviction, detention on remand and arrest. The author, referring to the legal doctrine and case-law, discusses the need for explicit regulation of the catalogue of parties in compensation proceedings, the proper location of the introduced provisions and their justification from the perspective of the model shape of proceedings regarding compensation for wrongful deprivation of liberty. In conclusion it is indicated that both the regulation of the parties to the proceedings and entities representing the State Treasury deserve approval. However, the introduced provisions require two corrections. They concern the determination of the procedural status of the prosecutor and the standardization of terminology relating to the petitioner.

PL

Celem artykułu jest krytyczna analiza wprowadzanej ustawą z 19 lipca 2019 r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks postępowania karnego oraz niektórych innych ustaw regulacji określającej strony postępowania w przedmiocie odszkodowania za niesłuszne skazanie, tymczasowe aresztowanie i zatrzymanie. Autor, odwołując się do dotychczasowego dorobku doktryny i orzecznictwa, omawia potrzebę unormowania wprost katalogu stron postępowania odszkodowawczego, właściwego umiejscowienia wprowadzonych przepisów oraz ich zasadności z perspektywy modelowego ukształtowania postępowania w przedmiocie odszkodowania za niesłuszne pozbawienie wolności. W konkluzji wskazano, że zarówno uregulowanie problematyki stron, jak i podmiotów reprezentujących Skarb Państwa zasługuje na aprobatę. Wprowadzone unormowania wymagają jednak dwóch korekt. Dotyczą one określenia statusu procesowego prokuratora oraz ujednolicenia terminologii odnoszącej się do strony czynnej postępowania.

5

Późnośredniowieczne Czechy z polskiej perspektywy, czyli Bogusława Czechowicza rzecz o rządach króla Władysława II Jagiellończyka [Bogusław Czechowicz, Idea i państwo. Korona Królestwa Czech w latach 1457–1547, t. IV: Król i stany, cz. 1: Siła słabości? Długie późne rządy Władysława II, Quaestio, Wrocław 2018, ss. 300]Czechowicz, Idea i państwo. Korona Królestwa Czech w latach 1457–1547, t. IV: Król i stany, cz. 1: Siła słabości? D

100%

Jasiński W.

|

2021

|

nr 2 (29)

217-224

6

Pavel Krafl, Dvě studie k synodálnímu zákonodárství (Würzburg 1287, Kališ 1420), Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre, Nitra 2021, ss. 119; ISBN 978-80-558-1740-8 [Ius canonicum medii aevii, vol. 2]

100%

Jasiński W.

|

2022

|

nr 2 (33)

208-210

7

Sprawozdanie z konferencji naukowej pt. Jak powstały Kielce? Nowe badania i nowe perspektywy. 950-lecie miasta, Kielce, 14–15 X 2021 r.

100%

Jasiński W.

|

2022

|

nr 2 (33)

219-225

8

David Kalhous, Bohemi Prozesse und Identitätsbildung in Frühpřemyslidischen Ländern (bis 1200), Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, 2018, ss. 262

100%

Jasiński W.

|

2022

|

nr 4(35)

231-238

9

Wokół kutnohorskiej elekcji Władysława II Jagiellończyka w świetle jego zobowiązań i czeskich postulatów

100%

Jasiński W.

|

2022

|

nr 3 (34)

11-29

EN

In this article I studied the undertaking of King Vladislaus II of Bohemia (1456– –1516), which he have to oblige to became a czech king after the death of George of Poděbrady and the demands of Czechs expressed on the Diet at Kutná Hora.

10

Petryfikacja składu sądu w przepisach intertemporalnych: uwagi na tle postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 29 listopada 2016 r., I KZP 9/16

75%

Jasiński W.

Ius Novum

|

2017

|

tom 11

|

nr 3

21-36

11

Pouczenia osoby podejrzanej oraz podejrzanego o uprawnieniach i obowiązkach procesowych po nowelizacji Kodeksu postępowania karnego

63%

Czerniak D. , Jasiński W.

Przegląd Prawa i Administracji

|

2015

|

tom 100

53-75

EN

The article discusses the suspect’s right to information in pre-trial proceedings. Although undoubtedlythe judicial proceeding is the crucial part of a criminal trial, the importance of the investigative phase cannot be underestimated. This is mainly due to the fact that the Code of Criminal Procedure does not limit the court in basing its judgement on evidence gathered during investigation. For that reason guaranteeing the suspect the right to information at the initial stage of the proceedings is very important from the point of view of effective defence. The authors present and critically assess recent changes in the Code of Criminal Procedure, which entered into force on 1st July 2015 as a part of far-going amendments maximalising the adversariality of a criminal trial in Poland. The article aims to establish whether the above-mentioned amendments guarantee that the suspect receives clear, adequate and comprehensive information about his rights and duties in preliminary proceedings. The authors’ evaluation is generally positive. Nonetheless, they identify several important flaws in the amended provisions concerning the adequacy of provided information that should be eliminated.

12

Identity Checks - the legal framework and practice of applications

51%

Czerwińska D. , Jasiński W. , Kremens K.

|

2023

|

tom 150(2)

221-245

EN

The article discusses the regulation of identity checks in Poland and their practice. First, the article examines the constitutional and international law standards concerning identity checks. It is followed by the analysis of statutory and sub-statutory regulations relating to identifying a person focusing on conditions under which ID checks may be undertaken, agencies authorized to carry on the ID checks and the ways in which it must be carried on. The study underlines the important role of the case law in shaping the boundaries of the legality of ID checks. It is emphasised by the courts that the citizen’s duty to show their ID is predetermined by conducting a proper procedure by police officers, as well as by the existence of sufficient legal and factual grounds for checking one’s identity. The criteria of distinguishing between an ID check and a stop and arrest were also developed in the case law. In conclusions, it was pointed out that at the constitutional and international level there are no specific provisions relating to the identity checks. However, the Constitution of the Republic of Poland requires statutory regulation of the prerequisites and key issues of the procedure for carrying out an ID check. Analysis of the statutory regulation leads to the conclusion that the former element has not been met. The courts try to fill this with their case law, clearly indicating that and ID check may only be conducted if justified by sufficient legal and factual grounds. Nevertheless, the legislator’s intervention would be desirable. The authors also draw attention to the fact that the courts present a strict and well-grounded approach towards the distinction between identifying documents and detaining. The criterion in this case is not the purpose of the activities undertaken by the authorized body, but the degree and duration of the interference with the rights of the individual.

13

Is Age a Risk Factor of Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Cancer?

38%

Wydra J. , Kruszewski W. , Jasiński W. , Szajewski M. , Ciesielski M. , Szefel J. , Walczak J.

Polish Journal of Surgery

|

2013

|

tom 85

|

nr 9

491-495

EN

Colorectal cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm in elderly with peak of incidence in 7. and 8. decade of life. Elderly patients with colorectal cancer more often require surgery. Advanced age of patients seems to increase the risk of postoperative complications. The aim of the study was to compare the frequency of early complications in two groups of patients: under 75 and over 75, undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery. Material and methods. 440 consecutive adult patients subjected to colorectal cancer surgery between 08.2006 to 10.2011 in Oncological Surgery Department, Gdynia Centre of Oncology. Group A (over 75 year-of-life): 109 patients, median 79 and group B (up to 75 year-of-life): 331 patients, median 65. Patients requiring emergency surgery were excluded from the study. Postoperative 30-day mortality, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, bowel obstruction, postoperative respiratory and circulatory insufficiency were among analyzed complications. Results. Symptomatic disease was observed in 81.6% of group A and in 83% of group B. Groups A and B were comparable concerning: BMI, gender, tumor staging, rate of curative and palliative resections, and duration of hospital stay. Accompanying diseases were more common in group A (83% vs 65%; p<0.0002). Early complications occurred in 21.1% of patients from group A and in 19.9% from group B. The rate of reoperation in early perioperative period didn’t differ (6.4% vs 5.7%). Features like: age, gender, additional illnesses, tumor location and staging did not influence the occurrence of perioperative complications. Conclusions. Age itself is not a risk factor for postoperative complications in spite of higher rate of accompanying diseases in elderly.

14

Protective Stomy as a Complement to Anterior Rectal Resection. Analysis of Authors' Material and Literature Review

32%

Kruszewski W. , Jasiński W. , Szajewski M. , Szefel J. , Kawecki K. , Ciesielski M. , Pikiel P. , Dilling P. , Warężak C.

Polish Journal of Surgery

|

2011

|

tom 83

|

nr 3

150-154

EN

Anastomotic leak after anterior rectal resection for cancer is one of the most dangerous complications of the procedure. Protective stomy is a way to avoid life-threatening consequences of this complication. The procedure is still under evaluation.The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of forming a protective stomy as part of anterior rectal cancer resection on the basis of an analysis of the authors' material.Material and methods. In 2008 - 2009, we treated 111 patients with rectal cancer. Thirty-two of those patients received preoperative radio(chemo)therapy. Eighty-four patients (76%) underwent resection of the primary tumour. In 20 patients (24%), we performed abdominoperineal or abdominosacral resection; in 6 (7%) cases the Hartmann procedure was used and in 58 (69%) cases anterior rectal resection was performed. In 53 of 58 cases, the resections were assessed as curative and in 5 as palliative. In 18 of 58 (31%) patients, anterior resections were defined as low anterior resections. Twelve (67%) of these patients were subjected to preoperative radio(chemo)therapy. Two of 58 patients, who underwent anterior resection, had been treated by stomy creation before the radical procedure. One of them required neoadjuvant radiotherapy. In the second patient with the stomy, we restored the intestinal continuity during the primary tumour resection. Among the remaining 40 patients, only one underwent protective stomy creation during the resective procedure. This patient did not require preoperative radiotherapy.Results. We have not found any clinical indications of anastomotic leak in the analysed group of 58 patients subjected to anterior rectal resection for cancer.Conclusions. Our modest experience reaffirms our conviction that anterior rectal cancer resection does not require routine protective stomy creation, also when low anterior resection follows preoperative radiotherapy.