Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.
Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 6

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Artykuł dotyczy problematyki przywrócenia do polskiego porządku prawnego insty-tucji asesora sądowego. Na mocy wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 2007 r. stwier-dzono niekonstytucyjność przepisu umożliwiającego powierzenie asesorom czynności sędziowskich przez Ministra Sprawiedliwości, wobec czego w 2009 r. ustawodawca wy-eliminował tę instytucję z porządku prawnego. W 2015 r. jednak ustawodawca przy-wrócił instytucję asesora sądowego, dokonując istotnych zmian w tym zakresie w 2018 r. W stosunku do tego rozwiązania podnoszone były wątpliwości co do możliwości orze-kania przez asesora, w tym również na tle orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego. Celem arty-kułu jest przybliżenie tej instytucji i rozwianie wątpliwości na temat możliwości orze-kania przez asesora sądowego.
EN
The article concerns the issue of restoring the institution of a judicial assessor in the Po-lish legal order, after the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 2007 in which it dec-lared unconstitutionality of this institution. In 2015, however, the legislator restored the institution of an assessor, introducing significant changes in this respect in 2018. In rela-tion to this solution, doubts were raised as to the possibility of adjudication by an assessor, also in the context of the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. The aim of the article is to pre-sent this institution and dispel doubts about the possibility of adjudication by an assessor.
EN
The article presents the issues related to the new extraordinary appeal introduced in December 2017 in the form of an extraordinary complaint. The intention of this article is to present how the premises of this complaint are understood by the Supreme Court. The conditions for the admissibility of an extraordinary complaint are defined in an evaluative and vague manner, therefore the analysis of their perception by the Supreme Court will allow for the presentation of this special extraordinary measure, which occupies a special place in comparison with other existing extraordinary appeal measures.
EN
The article deals with the issues related to the compliance with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of punishment under the criminal law of defamation (article 212 of the Penal Code) and the possibility of repealing this regulation. By a decision of 14 July 2021, the Constitutional Tribunal discontinued the proceedings under the constitutional complaint, in which the complainant, convicted for this offense, accused art. 212 and 213 of the Penal Code from art. 54 paragraph in connection with art. 31 paragraph 3 of the Constitution. The Court found that this issue had already been resolved in previous jurisprudence. However, this does not change the fact that the issue of punishment for defamation still remains doubtful and should be repealed.
EN
In recent years in the political debate were formulated postulates concerning the introduction of the Polish legal order of the institutions of the courts of the peace. The implementation of this is three draft laws about the courts of the peace submitted to the Sejm. The article presents the main assumptions of these projects and attempts to evaluate them in their current form. Of all the three projects, the project presented by the President of the Republic of Poland is the most comprehensive. The solutions contained in it are worth undertaking further work on them. The very institution of justice of the peace is justified in the Polish legal tradition and is also present in the legislation of some European countries. The presented proposal is in line with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, as it establishes the court of the peace as an element of the common judiciary and guarantees the independence and independence of the courts of the peace.
|
|
nr PL 2 (124)/2023
132-154
EN
The subject of the article is the discussion of prohibited acts concerning child pornography consisted in the possession and production of materials including that content and a minor participation. Criminal provisions penalizing these activities were introduced into the Penal Code in 2004 and have been amended many times since then. Currently, the Criminal Code refers to these crimes as the “minority” mark which refers to every person under the age of 18. In this area, however, for a number of years, the possession of such content was punishable only in relation to a minor under 15 years of age, which justifies a closer look at prohibited acts.
EN
The paper concerns the analysis of the possibility for classifying the Internet as a public place, which is of extraordinary legal significance with regard to the fulfilment of the criteria of many prohibited acts. Such a statement was presented by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland in its judgment of 17 April 2018, case ref. no. IV KK 296/17. This paper attempts to assess the standpoint of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland and the way it is reflected in various factual situations. To determine whether the Internet can constitute a public space in the sense of criminal law, several factors must be indicated, including, first of all, the application of an appropriate interpretation of the norms of criminal law.
PL
Artykuł zawiera analizę możliwości zakwalifikowania Internetu jako miejsca publicznego, co ma swoje doniosłe znaczenie prawne dla spełnienia znamion wielu typów czynów zabronionych. Taką tezę zaprezentował Sąd Najwyższy w wyroku z dnia 17 kwietnia 2018 roku (sygn. IV KK 296/17). Niniejszy tekst to próba oceny stanowiska Sądu Najwyższego oraz jego przełożenia na różnorakie stany faktyczne. W kwestii tego, czy Internet może stanowić miejsce publiczne w rozumieniu prawa karnego, trzeba wskazać na kilka okoliczności, przede wszystkim na zastosowanie właściwego sposobu wykładni norm prawa karnego.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.