Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

6 Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

Znaleziono wyników: 6

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

GENERÁLNE KLAUZULY V SÚŤAŽNOM PRÁVE

100%

Kalesná K.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

2016

tom 99

nr 2

79 – 88

The article is contribution to the discussion concerning general clauses in the legal regulation and the law application process. Starting from general clauses theoretical definition it drives attention to general clauses in competition law, focusing interest on abuse of a dominant position legal regulation in Act on Protection of Competition especially after its last amendment in 2014 was adopted. In context of legal regulation based on general clause and demonstrative list of the most often existing practices of abuse it explores reasons why essential facilities doctrine was deleted from the legal regulation. The Slovak legislator defends this step with the argument that there is special legal regulation of essential facilities neither in the EU competition law (Art. 102 TFEU) nor in the legal regulation of other member states. Essential facilities are represented as a special institute developed in the case law and not requiring specific legal regulation in the Act on Protection of Competition. The article argues that using the EU competition law as a model for national regulation does not mean the necessity to copy this regulation precisely and compares the Slovak act with the Czech regulation where essential facilities doctrine is comprised in the legislative text.

OCHRANA ZÁKLADNÝCH PRÁV V SÚŤAŽNOM PRÁVE

100%

Kalesná K.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

2016

tom 99

nr 6

466 – 473

Protection of fundamental rights of the competition actors acquires increasing significance mainly in connection with dawn raids in business premises of undertakings applied as an effective tool in detection of anticompetitive behaviour. Need to balance public interest on protection of competition with legitimate rights of undertakings bring o lot of problems and open questions. Especially the courts both on European and national level are confronted with the problem of conflicting interests. The article is therefore focused on case law of the ECHR, the EU and Slovak courts.

ZNEUŽITIE DOMINANTNÉHO POSTAVENIA NA DIGITÁLNOM TRHU

100%

Kalesná K.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

2022

tom 105

nr 6

497 – 506

The article addresses topical issues of enforcement of the legal regulation of abuse of a dominant position prohibition embedded in art. 102 TFEU in current circumstances of digital platforms environment. It analyses changes in relevant market assessment, as well as defining dominance in the relevant market. It explores both traditional and new forms of abusive behaviour of a dominant undertaking and finally, it draws attention to the design of remedies in cases of abuse and their effectiveness.

BUDE FUNGOVAŤ SÚKROMNOPRÁVNE VYMÁHANIE SÚŤAŽNÉHO PRÁVA?

100%

Kalesná K.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

2018

tom 101

nr 1

54 – 61

The Slovak Republic has fulfilled its obligation to transpose the EU Directive on private enforcement of competition law (2014/104/EU) approving the Act No 350/2016 Coll. on certain rules regulating actions on recovery of damage caused by competition rules violation. Although the act is in force for a couple of months by now there is a serious doubt concerning working of this legal regulation in practice. Based on the US successful experience with the private enforcement of competition law the article informs about the legal regulation of the so called horizontal framework of collective redress in the EU and afterwards explores the ambitions of the Slovak legislator in this field. It draws attention to the main difference resulting from the comparison of the respective EU recommendation and the reality in the Slovak republic. Whereas in EU recommendation is the general regulation of collective redress covering more specific branches of law foreseen (e. g. consumer protection, environmental law, competition law), in the Slovak republic the ambition of the class actions regulation is by now restricted by the framework of consumer protection regulation (Consumer Code comprising also class actions is being prepared). The article offers also other alternatives to this legislative solution that perhaps correspond better to the presented EU approach.

KTO SA MÔŽE ZÚČASTNIŤ VEREJNÉHO OBSTARÁVANIA?

100%

Kalesná K.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

2019

tom 102

nr 3

224 – 233

A competition belongs to the main principles of public procurement. The public procurement has to be opened to competition in order to fulfil the main objectives of public procurement – to select a bid most convenient as quality price ratio principle is concerned. The article gives a more detailed analysis of economic subjects as possible public procurement participants. It explores differences in understanding the key concepts – undertaking, consortium, economic activity - from the point of view of both branches of economic regulation. At the same time it offers solutions how to develop competition in public procurement – on one hand through adequate interpretation of the relevant concepts, on the other hand, eventually, by amending the public procurement legal regulation.

DIGITÁLNE PLATFORMY: SÚŤAŽNÉ PRÁVO VERZUS REGULÁCIA EX ANTE

63%

Kalesná K. , Patakyová M.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

2021

tom 104

nr 1

26 – 38

Digital age has brought many challenges for legal regulation. One of vividly discussed issue is a question on possible regulation of digital platforms. Digital platforms have had an impact within business sphere as well as broader socio-political impact. This article aspires to contribute to the discussion on regulation of digital platform. In particular it explores application of competition law and regulation ex ante. It asks to what extent competition law can solve issues related with digital platforms. Since an exhaustive answer to the question is beyond the limits of one article, this article focuses on the definition of a digital platform, followed by a discourse on competition law and ex ante regulation. The possible insufficiencies of competition law are examined based on two cases: German Facebook case and Google Shopping case. The article shows that competition law might be reaching its limits in dealing with certain particular issues related to digital platforms.