Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

2 Civitas et Lex

2 Mozyro P.

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Ofiary za sakramenty i sakramentalia na przykładzie Diecezji Ełckiej

100%

Mozyro P.

nr 1

65-77

The subject of the article is to present the issues related to offering and accounting for offerings for sacraments and sacramentals using the example of the Diocese of Ełk. The primary source for these considerations is the Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope John Paul II in 1983, with amendments up to 2022. The starting point of these considerations is to provide a definition of sacrament and sacramental, essentially referring to the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, with historical data taken into account. The article further clarifies the concept of offering by referring to its dictionary meaning, whether it is an offering made to God or an offering made of oneself. In the first part, the article also presents the general church legislation regarding offerings made for sacraments and sacramentals, considering issues related to accounting, the sustenance of clergy, determining Mass stipends, iura stolae, and associated practices. In the later part of the article, there is a reference to particular legislation within the Diocese of Ełk, with special emphasis on the statutes of the First Synod of the Diocese of Ełk and decisions made by individual bishops of the Diocese of Ełk. The Synod recalls the force of canon 848 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which states that, on the occasion of administering sacraments, it is permissible to accept an offering determined by competent church authority and in accordance with prevailing custom. In this part of the article, it becomes evident that particular legislation does not make significant resolutions on the discussed issue but rather creates a space for the practical application of the general norm. Particularly, in the Economic Decree of the Diocese of Ełk, certain practical provisions are found. The last part includes the presentation of customs and issues in applying the legal norm and a summary. It is worth noting that the issue of offerings made by the faithful on the occasion of administering sacraments and sacramentals, the voluntary nature of donations, and the fairness of compensation for clergy is a highly complex matter. It combines the spiritual and material aspects – invisible grace and material object. The Church must safeguard the purity of the sign, eliminate any abuses, and simultaneously ensure the fairness of compensation for clergy. In today’s times, when society, including the faithful of the Catholic Church, expects a high level of transparency, it is important to address the issues that can contribute to a better understanding of the practices of the Catholic Church.

Zarząd zwyczajny i nadzwyczajny dobrami parafialnymi - funkcje i obowiązki proboszcza

100%

Mozyro P.

tom 40

nr 4

83-94

The subject of the article is to present the issues related to the ordinary and extraordinary administration of parish goods, with particular emphasis on the functions and duties of the parish priest. The primary source for these considerations is the Code of Canon Law of Pope John Paul II, promulgated in 1983, with amendments up to 2022, specifically canons 1254 to 1289. The starting point for these deliberations is the delineation of the office of the parish priest and his responsibilities in the administration of the parish as a public juridical person. Canon 1279 clarifies the issue of the public representation of a juridical person and the administration of its temporal goods. The administration of the material goods of the parish is closely linked to the office of the parish priest, who, by virtue of canon 532, assumes the right and duty to represent the parish and simultaneously manage its resources. Ecclesiastical legislators grant parish priests significant freedom in the administration of the parish; however, this autonomy is not without oversight and limitations. Consequently, within ecclesiastical legislation, a distinction is made between the ordinary and extraordinary administration of temporal goods. This distinction, although necessary, is not entirely clear and may raise many doubts as to whether we are dealing with ordinary or extraordinary administration. It is therefore essential to differentiate between these two types of administration and provide specific examples derived from the provisions of the code, as this leads to the application of different procedural actions.