Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Between tradition and modernity of the cultural landscape research. Discussion on methodology

100%

Myga-Piątek U.

tom nr 9

75--91

At present, geographic work, and landscape research in particular, is carried out basing on three coexistent paradigms. The first is the classical paradigm arising from the neo-positivist orientation with scientistic approach. Representatives of this approach follow the rule of objectivity and independence of perception of the object (landscape) in relation to the observer (subject). The principal determinant of this approach is methodological unity and rationalism based on the rules of quantitative, mathematical-statistical description. Foremost among others, this trend is representted by followers of the eastern school of landscape research, named “landshaftovedeniye”. Among the classical followers of this approach, there were L.. S. Berg, N. A. Solontsev, A. G. Isachenko, F. N. Milkov, D. L. Armand, V. J. Preobrazhensky, A. I. Perelman, N. A. Gvozdetsky. The second is the system paradigm, which develops as a modification rather than opposition to the first approach. In this aspect, studies of systems (geosystems) have become a new cognitive criterion. Its principal assumption is the holistic concept of nature. Studies of the landscape as a geosystem present the structuraldynamic and functional aspects. This trend is widely noticeable in papers by authors of landscape syntheses created within the scope of interdisciplinary landscape ecology, which is very popular currently (papers by A. Richling, M. Pietrzak, K. Ostaszewska, J. Solon, Forman and Godron, W.B. Soczawa, among other authors). The third is the humanist paradigm, which develops along with the system paradigm. It points out the role of man in the process of landscape shaping and its cultural conditions in a particular environmental context, thus referring to the idea of unity of nature and culture. It is based on papers by leading possibilists, including P. Vidal de la Blache (1922), and the so-called landscape approach, represented in Polish geography by S. Nowakowski, M. Dobrowolska, F. Bujak, or J. and F. Plit, among others. Coexistence of those paradigms results in discrepancies in understanding and interpretation of the landscape. The presentation will show the current stage of research and prospected further studies of cultural landscape resulting from the possible combination of the classicist approach of humanist geography and use of new research methods and sources.

Czy możliwa jest prognoza zmian krajobrazu kulturowego Polski? Szkic problematyki w ujęciu geograficznym. Część 1 – siły sprawcze

51%

Myga-Piątek U. , Plit F. , Plit J.

tom nr 41 (1)

185--202

W badaniach krajobrazu kulturowego dużą rolę odgrywa podejście ewolucyjne, wyjaśniające obecny jego stan przez analizę zmian w minionych stuleciach. Kolejnym etapem badań krajobrazowych, o dużym walorze praktycznym, staje się przewidywanie zmian krajobrazu. Prognozowanie stanowi bardzo ważny element teoretycznych badań naukowych. W artykule zwrócono uwagę na potrzebę takich prognoz, omówiono trudności związane z ich opracowywaniem. Uzasadniono, dlaczego w Polsce najdalszy horyzont czasowy prognoz krajobrazowych sięgać może nie dalej niż do 2050 r. Ukazano czynniki: środowiskowe, polityczne, ekonomiczne, społeczne, biopsychiczne populacji, demograficzne, kulturowe i regionalne, które do 2050 r. wpływać będą z dużym prawdopodobieństwem na ewolucję krajobrazu kulturowego Polski. Przyszłe jego zmiany – efekty działania sił sprawczych zostaną omówione zostaną w kolejnym artykule.

The evolutionary approach, which explains the current condition of the cultural landscape by analysing changes within it over the past centuries, plays an important part in cultural landscape research. The next stage of landscape research with a high practical value is the forecasting of changes in the landscape. Forecasting is a substantial element of theoretical research. This article points out the need for such forecasts and discusses the difficulties that might appear while preparing them. It explains why the furthest time horizon for landscape forecasts in Poland may not reach further than the year 2050. It presents environmental, political, economic, social, biopsychic, demographic, cultural and regional factors that will most probably determine the evolution of the cultural landscape in Poland until 2050. Future changes in the cultural landscape – results of the discussed driving forces – will be dealt with in the next article.