Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
|
2013
|
nr 1(4)
251-274
XX
The article is a part of my PhD thesis entitled “To see is to know. The cultural dimension of human perception” written at the Humanities Department of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. It presents remarks on the differences between social constructivism, conceptualism and postconstructivism in understanding and describing visual perception. The main idea is to show the cultural dimension of visual perception, so social constructivism is a way of thinking I accept. I create my own, very Polish, model of social constructivism that is complex with the theory of thought styles and thought collectives by Ludwik Fleck and the theory of culture of the Poznań school. of, mainly thesis of Anna Pałubicka and Andrzej P. Kowalski. I accept most conceptualists’ remarks on perception formulated for example by J. McDowell in his “World and Mind”. The problem is that conceptualism believes our knowledge is ex deffinicione conceptional. It is false from the perspective of the anthropology of history (A.P. Kowalski) and the philosophy of culture (E. Cassirer) which focused on archaic cultures. On the other hand, I do not accept the postconstructivism (B. Olsen, T. Ingold) model of perception. My article also remarks on the dispute between many models of constructivism. I believe we should not remove “social” from constructivism.
XX
The text is a discussion of the issues of the tenth conference from the cycle "Colloquia Anthropologica et Communicativa" titled "Anthropology, media, communication" (Lądek Zdrój, 28-29 May 2018).
|
|
tom 16
391–406
PL
Artykuł krytycznie omawia zbiór tekstów poświęconych lwowskiemu mikrobiologowi i teoretykowi poznania naukowego – Ludwikowi Fleckowi. Artykuł przedstawienia główne tezy tekstów oraz merytorycznie ustosunkowuje się do nich, niekiedy podejmując polemikę.
EN
The article disscuses a set of texts dedicated to the Lvovian microbiologist and theorist of science knowledge – Ludwik Fleck. The article presents the main theses of the texts, taking a substantive and sometimes polemical stance on them.
XX
Starting point of the article is a one of the chapter of the book Anthropology of picture cognition wrote by Maciej Kociuba, where the author discus Homeric ekphrasis in the cognition dimension understanding in the philosophical context. An article has a polemic character. Author of the article, using thesis created by Eric Havelock and Andrzej P. Kowalski presents, that Homeric way of thinking was more magical than philosophical, because his culture was a culture before philosophy as a way of thinking and culture without writing.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.