Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Ocena sprawozdania Komisji Europejskiej: Kontrola stosowania prawa Unii Europejskiej. Sprawozdanie roczne za rok 2019

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2021

|

nr 2(70)

175-183

EN

The author points out that, in the light of the information contained in the report, negative developments include the fact that a relatively large number of infringement proceedings are initiated and pending against Poland and that Poland has recently lost a relatively large number of cases in the Court of Justice. On the other hand positive aspects include a significant reduction in the number of proceedings for failure to implement directives in a timely manner and the fact that in the reporting period no judgment was issued against Poland for failure to implement the judgment of the Court of Justice.

2

Ochrona Unii i jej państw członkowskich przed stosowaniem wymuszenia ekonomicznego przez państwa trzecie – projekt rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2022

|

nr 2(74)

133-142

EN

The document aims at establishing a mechanism enabling the Union to respond when a third country, by measures affecting trade or investment, interferes with the legitimate choices of the Union or of its Member States to adopt or refrain from adopting a particular act. Given the exclusive nature of the EU’s competences in the area of the Common Commercial Policy, as well as the EU’s economic potential and the resulting potentially greater effectiveness of response measures at the EU level, the proposal deserves to be supported by the representative of the Republic of Poland on the EU forum.

3

Wyrok Federalnego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego RFN w sprawach dotyczących decyzji Europejskiego Banku Centralnego

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2020

|

nr 3(67)

107-111

EN

The FCC took the position that it was bound by the judgments of the CJEU as long as the latter applied certain methods of interpretation and its judgments are not objectively arbitrary. In the case at hand, the FCC found that the CJEU manifestly failed to take into account the meaning and scope of the proportionality principle. Ultimately, the FCC independently assessed the ECB’s decisions in the light of primary EU law, while adjudicating on the consequences of finding them to be defective for the German authorities.

4

Analiza opracowania pt. „Polowania na ptaki. Zgodność z prawem międzynarodowym, unijnym i krajowym. Aspekt ochrony przyrody i humanitarno-prawny"

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2020

|

nr 1(65)

83-103

EN

According to the author, in numerous aspects the assessment of the compliance with the Birds Directive can be carried out at the local level, taking into account elements such as habitat characteristics, the nature of the hunt or the degree of actual probability of the error due to the similarity of hunted and protected species. The thesis that pheasants and partridges can be considered as game only after the maturity of their own broods is too far-reaching. According to the author, the use of lead shot in areas of special protection may be considered incompatible with the protection requirements of these areas, and the practice of general exclusion of hunting plans from the requirement to undergo an impact assessment on a given area may be considered incompatible with the Habitats Directive.

5

Opinia Komisji w sprawie projektu rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego ustanawiającego przepisy i ogólne warunki regulujące wykonywanie funkcji Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich (Statut Europejskiego Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich) i uchylającego decyzję 94/262/EWWiS, WE, Euratom

100%

Jaśkowski M.

|

nr 2(66)

87-94

EN

The European Commission has a mostly positive view of the draft EP regulation submitted by the European Parliament and states that many of the proposed changes consolidate current practice or introduce improvements. As regards some specific issues, the Commission made critical comments. Generally, the information of the Council of Ministers is in line with the opinion of the European Commission and deserves approval. The postulate contained in the information of the Council of Ministers to limit the scope of the concept of “maladministration” to violation of the right to good administration within the meaning of Art. 41 Charter of Fundamental Rights should be assessed negatively.

6

Interpretacja dyrektywy 2019/1

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2024

|

nr 1(81)

183-188

EN

The subject of this article is the interpretation of Directive (EU) 2019/1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. In the analysis, the author specifically focuses on Article 4 para. 4 of the Directive, which relates to how a national competition authority is selected. This provision requires that the procedure for selection or appointment be specified in advance in the legislation, be clear and precise. However, according to the author, this does not exclude the possibility of the political nature of the selection process of the candidate, the determination of his professional competence, involvement in political activities, or the term of the elected body.

7

Opinia w sprawie zakresu obowiązku notyfikacyjnego poselskiego projektu ustawy o sprzedaży żywności przez rolników i zmianie niektórych innych ustaw wraz z autopoprawką

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2016

|

nr 3(51)

106-110

EN

The opinion concerns the scope of the requirement to notify draft legislation. In an earlier opinion Bureau of Research of the Chancellery of the Sejm (BAS) said that the bill contained technical regulations within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 and is subject to notification to the European Commission. The author indicates the provisions of the draft which must be classified as technical regulations. He claims that, due to the requirement to send to the Commission – in addition to the draft technical regulations – the text of the basic legislative or regulatory provisions principally and directly concerned, it is considered that the entire bill is subject to notification. The notification requirement also covers reasons why the measure is being introduced.

8

Implikacje art. 3 rozporządzenia UE 2019/452 dla prawa polskiego

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego

|

2021

|

nr 1

49-57

EN

The conditions for mechanisms of screening of foreign direct investments employed by EU Member States are set out in Article 3 of EU Regulation 2019/452 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union. The purpose of the article is to assess the consequences of this provision for Polish law, with particular emphasis on the possible need for legislative intervention to ensure its full effectiveness. The following requirements have been taken into consideration: non-discrimination, transparency, appropriate timeframes, protection of confidential information, ensuring the right of recourse, preventing circumvention of the screening mechanism. The analysis leads to a conclusion that the entry into force of Article 3 of Regulation 2019/452 does not require Polish legislation to be amended.

PL

Warunki, jakim mają odpowiadać mechanizmy filtrowania bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych stosowane przez państwa członkowskie UE, zostały określone w art. 3 rozporządzenia UE 2019/452 ustanawiającego ramy monitorowania bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych w Unii. Celem artykułu jest przeanalizowanie konsekwencji tego przepisu dla prawa polskiego ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem ewentualnej konieczności interwencji ustawodawcy w celu zapewnienia pełnej jego skuteczności. Analizie zostały poddane następujące wymogi: zakaz dyskryminacji, przejrzystość, odpowiednie ramy czasowe, ochrona informacji poufnych, zapewnienie prawa do odwołania oraz przeciwdziałanie obchodzeniu mechanizmu monitorowania. Przeprowadzona ocena prowadzi do wniosku, że wejście w życie art. 3 rozporządzenia nie pociąga za sobą konieczności zmian w ustawodawstwie polskim.

9

Konsekwencje prawne Protokołu nr 30 w sprawie stosowania Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej do Polski i Zjednoczonego Królestwa

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2013

|

nr 4(40)

29-50

EN

The article examines the legal consequences of Protocol (No 30) on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom. The author notes that the Charter does not merely confirm the fundamental rights previously recognized in EU law, but also introduces new ones. In the light of this statement it is proposed, that – according to article 1(1) of the Protocol – the Charter does not extend the ability of given courts to examine the compliance of laws and practices of Poland and the UK with the Charter, as far as it introduces these new rights. Article 1(2) of the Protocol excludes the possibility of litigation based on provisions of title IV of the Charter. Article 2 of the Protocol aims at preventing the EU from imposing changes of national laws and practices in certain areas. In the light of provisions of the Charter (particularly article 52(6)) it is however doubtful, whether article 2 constitutes any genuine modification of legal obligations. Finally, the author notes, that according to the predominant view it would be theoretically possible for the Court of Justice of the EU to diminish or even deprive the Protocol of actual practical consequences by making use of general principles of EU law. This however might be regarded as a circumvention of primary EU law and as such deserves negative opinion.

10

Znaczenie wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE z 20 marca 2018 r. w sprawie C-187/16 dla oceny zgodności rządowego projektu ustawy o dokumentach publicznych (druk 2153) z prawem UE

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2018

|

nr 2(58)

96-115

EN

The opinion presents the subject of the dispute and the judgment in the case C-187/16, the comparison of legal and factual situation related to that case with measures proposed in the governmental Bill as well as assessment on the significance of this judgment for further work on this Bill. The state of law being assessed in the case C-187/16 is comparable to measures included in the governmental Bill. The main difference is that Osterreichische Staatsdruckerei is a private company, whereas the company mentioned in Article 17 of the bill shall be a company wholly owned by the State Treasury. Therefore, in the author’s opinion it is possible to encompass production of given documents by the exemption provided in Article 12 para. 1 of the Directive 2014/24, but under additional conditions. If the Company is not considered an entity covered by this exemption, invoking the need to protect essential security interests of the state would require supplementing the grounds of the Bill by taking into account the position of the Court of Justice in the judgment C-187/16.

11

Opinia prawna w sprawie ratyfikacji umowy o wspólnym obszarze lotniczym między Unią Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi a Gruzją

100%

Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2013

|

nr 3(39)

236-240

EN

The author, following an analysis of Article 10 of the above‑mentioned Agreement, claims that the requirement of Article 89 (1) (5) of the Constitution has been met, which means that the Agreement should be ratified upon prior consent granted by statute. He concludes that the procedure for its ratification proposed by the Council of Ministers (Article 89(2) is improper.

12

Opinia w sprawie roli parlamentów narodowych (z uwzględnieniem roli Sejmu i Senatu) w procedurze wyjścia Zjednoczonego Królestwa z Unii Europejskiej

100%

Jaśkowski M.

|

nr 4(52)

107-112

EN

The author of the article observes that the provisions of TEU and TFEU do not envisage any role for national parliaments in the procedure of withdrawing from the European Union. In Poland, such rights can be interpreted from internal legal order of the Republic of Poland, for example from the act on cooperation between the Council of Ministers and Sejm and Senate. Sejm and Senate can request bills concerning the UK leaving the European Union from the Council of Ministers. In case a revision treaty is concluded, the procedure of ratification involving the Polish Parliament will be necessary. Such ratification will be also needed in case a new mixed agreement with the United Kingdom is concluded.

13

Opinia na temat konkluzji z posiedzenia Rady Europejskiej (10 i 11 grudnia 2020 r.) dotyczących projektu rozporządzenia w sprawie ogólnego systemu warunkowości służącego ochronie budżetu Unii

63%

Jaroszyński T. , Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2021

|

nr 1(69)

114-124

EN

The authors discuss the conclusions of the European Council addressing issues related to the concept of conditionality in the context of the draft regulation of the European Commission of 2nd May 2018, which would authorize the Council to implement measures for the protection of the Union budget. The authors also question the compliance of the Commission’s declaration, in which it takes note of the conclusions of the European Council and confirms its position, with the proposed regulation.

14

Wkład parlamentów regionalnych i lokalnych w kontrolę przestrzegania zasady subsydiarności ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roli Komitetu Regionów

63%

Jaśkowski M. , Krawczyk K.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2022

|

nr 3(75)

99-108

EN

The Polish Constitution does not provide for the existence of regional parliaments with legislative competences in Poland. The chambers of the Polish Parliament are therefore not obliged to hold consultations under Article 6 of the Protocol on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality. However, members of self-governing representative bodies are members of the EU’s Committee of the Regions, which can bring an action before the Court of Justice of the EU for violation of the principle of subsidiarity by an EU act and can also take a position on the compliance of EU action with the principle of subsidiarity as an advisory body.

15

Analiza wniosku dotyczącego decyzji wykonawczej Rady w sprawie środków ochrony budżetu Unii przed naruszeniami zasad państwa prawnego na Węgrzech (COM(2022) 485 final)

63%

Sobieraj K. , Jaśkowski M.

|

nr 4(76)

105-121

EN

The authors analyse the European Commission’s proposal to activate the so-called ‘money for the rule of law’ mechanism against Hungary. It recommends to the Council of the EU to withhold 65% of EU funds to Hungary for the implementation of three operational programmes under the cohesion policy. As a direct consequence of the proposal, there could be a debate in the EU Council on the merits of imposing EU budget protection measures on Hungary. The proposed EU budget protection measures are considered to contain phrases that are evaluative in nature. They therefore require strict interpretation. The Government of the Republic of Poland expressed a negative position regarding the adoption of the Commission’s proposed implementing decision.

16

Analiza propozycji zmiany dyrektywy Rady 2011/85/UE w sprawie wymogów ram budżetowych państw członkowskich

63%

Szpringer Z. , Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2023

|

nr 3(79)

133-145

EN

The amendment to the directive is related to the reform of the EU economic governance framework, the goals of which are to: increase accountability at the national level, simplify the budgetary frameworks, focus more on the medium-term perspective and, at the same time, enforce the rules more strictly and consistently. Measures to achieve these objectives are to include: simplifying legislation, increasing transparency of regulations, strengthening national accountability of the budget process, and improving the quality of public finances. Adoption of the directive in the form proposed by the European Commission would entail, inter alia, the creation of a new independent budgetary institution in Poland, as well as the introduction of a legal basis for its functioning.

17

Ocena rządowego projektu ustawy o dokumentach publicznych (druk sejmowy nr 2153)

63%

Bachmat P. , Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2018

|

nr 1(57)

115-130

EN

In the aspect of compatibility with the UE law it has been pointed out that to the extent the project aims to exclude certain categories of prints and documents from the regulation of Directive 2014/24, it may be considered incompatible with this directive. It was recommended to suspend work on the bill until the CJEU delivers its judgment concerning case C-187/16. Furthermore in the aspect of compatibility with the rules of criminal procedure it was considered that the advantage of the proposed normative solution of Article 40 para. 3 is the pragmatic linking of access to evidence with the principles of procedural economy, i.e. the guarantee of access to material evidence is conditioned by the objectives of the criminal proceedings.

18

Ocena zmienionego wniosku dotyczącego decyzji Rady w sprawie systemu zasobów własnych Unii Europejskiej

51%

Kulicki J. , Szpringer Z. , Jaśkowski M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2020

|

nr 4(68)

122-133

EN

The purpose of the proposed decision is to raise the limit of the annual own resources in relation to the national income (GNI) of the EU Member States and to empower the Commission to borrow up to EUR 750 billion at 2018 prices on the capital markets on behalf of the EU. These borrowed funds would be dedicated solely to combating the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the authors of the opinion, the proposal is valid and rational from the perspective of protection and development of the internal market as an important Community element and does not raise doubts as to its compliance with the principle of subsidiarity. Its compatibility with Article 310 TFEU may however be disputed.

19

Opinia merytoryczna i prawna na temat wniosku dotyczącego dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie zbliżenia przepisów ustawowych, wykonawczych i administracyjnych państw członkowskich w sprawie produkcji, prezentowania i sprzedaży wyrobów tytoniowych i powiązanych wyrobów

51%

Ciura G. , Jaśkowski M. , Stankiewicz D.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2013

|

nr 1(37)

133-157

EN

The authors of the opinion point out that the proposed directive is aimed at the protection of consumer’s health and, as a consequence, the reduction of state budget spending on medical treatment. Nevertheless, the possible imposition of a ban on menthol and slim cigarettes may lead to the weakening of Polish tobacco sector, decrease in tax revenues for the State, withdrawal from farming by some tobacco growers and development of a grey market. In the authors’ view, the draft directive may infringe those provisions which determine the scope of competences transferred to the EU by its member states in the field of health protection. The coming into force of the proposed directive would require amendment of the Act of 9th November 1995 on the protection of health against the consequences of the use of tobacco and tobacco products.