Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Wpływ prawa Unii Europejskiej na krajowe prawo procesowe cywilne

100%

Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2019

|

tom 28

|

nr 2

297-333

EN

The article presents the impact of European Union law on civil procedural law of the Member States, as exemplified by Polish law. The author distinguishes between three levels of such influence, i.e. the level of respect for EU primary law, the level on which EU legislation in procedural matters functions together with national civil procedural law and, finally, the level of implementation of EU law in the context of national procedural law. Each level is illustrated by different practical examples of how civil procedural law is established and applied in Poland. The author concludes that the impact of EU law on domestic civil procedural law is one of the main challenges faced today by civil procedural law.

2

Współczesne problemy kodyfikacji prawa postępowania cywilnego

100%

Weitz K.

Forum Prawnicze

|

2020

|

nr 3(59)

28–46

EN

The author considers the issue of whether the postulate of creating a new code of civil procedure is still valid. He comes to the conclusion that the following arguments support the new codification: the poor state of the current Code of Civil Procedure and the need to take into account the challenges facing civil procedural law like constitutionalization, Europeanization and digitalization of this law, as well as the creation of new solutions to protect collective interests. However, he indicates, as obstacles to the preparation of the new code, the collapse of the culture of creating law in Poland, problems resulting from changes in the justice system and threats resulting from legal populism.

3

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2021–2022) — rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

63%

Gołąb A. , Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2023

|

tom 32

|

nr 3

491-595

EN

Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the CJEU’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 2015/848), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007) etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they are endeavoring not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects

4

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2021–2022) — rozporządzenia nr 2015/848, nr 1346/2000, nr 1393/2007, nr 2001/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 1896/2006, nr 650/2012 i nr 1206/2001

63%

Gołąb A. , Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2023

|

tom 32

|

nr 4

721-779

EN

Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the CJEU’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation, the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012) etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they endeavor not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

5

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2013–2014) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001

63%

Pilich M. , Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2015

|

tom 24

|

nr 3

589-691

EN

In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The law of international civil procedure thus remains one of the most vividly developing spheres of the European integration. The importance of the above-mentioned ECJ preliminary rulings judgments is primordial for the Polish and European lawyers, all the more so as the Brussels Ibis ('Recast') Regulation No. 1215/2012 is set to apply as from January 2015, which naturally gives rise to the question of validity of the previous case law on the original Regulation No. 44/2001 under its amended and reviewed version. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

6

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2013–2014) – rozporządzenia nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1206/2001

63%

Pilich M. , Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2015

|

tom 24

|

nr 4

933-974

EN

In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The law of international civil procedure thus remains one of the most vividly developing spheres of the European integration. The article contains the overall review of the ECJ acquis in the field of the EU international family law and several other instruments of the international civil procedure, incl. the Regulation for the European Enforcement Order, the European Payment Order, the Cross-Border Insolvency, and the Evidence Regulations. The motives of the ECJ judgments are confronted systematically with the scholarly elaborations, often critical about various aspects of the Court’s legal reasoning. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

7

Przegląd orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2011-2012)

51%

Grzegorczyk P. , Rylski P. , Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2013

|

tom 22

|

nr 3

657-772

EN

In the introduction to the subject matter there is a draft of the status of binding provisions in the scope of European civil process law. Next it is subject to analysis the judicature concerning regulation 44/2001 (Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters). Particularly European Court of Justice judgments are discussed as to exemplify: - a scope of application of regulation mentioned above, - general questions concerning jurisdiction, - particular jurisdictions (matters concerning contracts, torts, forum conexitatis), - jurisdiction for consumer matters, - jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment, - exclusive jurisdictions, - recognition and enforcement. The study takes into consideration selected questions regarding to the following European Union legal acts: - regulation 2001/2003 (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, - regulation 805/2004 (Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims), - regulation 1896/2006 (Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure), - regulation 1346/2000 (Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings), - regulation 1393/2007 (Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000), - regulation 1206/2001 (Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters).

8

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2019–2020) — rozporządzenia nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 2015/848, nr 861/2007, nr 650/2012, nr 1346/2000, nr 1393/2007 i nr 655/2014

51%

Gołąb A. , Weitz K. , Wołodkiewicz B.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2021

|

tom 30

|

nr 4

861-913

EN

Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation, the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they endeavour not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

9

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2015–2016) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

51%

Pilich M. , Rylski P. , Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2017

|

tom 26

|

nr 3

649-765

EN

In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations (Regulation No. 44/2001 and Regulation No. 1215/2012, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

10

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2019–2020) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

51%

Gołąb A. , Weitz K. , Wołodkiewicz B.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2021

|

tom 30

|

nr 3

519-605

EN

Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they are endeavouring not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

11

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2017–2018) – rozporządzenie nr 44/2001 i rozporządzenie nr 1215/2012

51%

Rylski P. , Weitz K. , Wołodkiewicz B.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2019

|

tom 28

|

nr 3

705-799

EN

Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they are endeavouring not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

12

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2017–2018) — rozporządzenia nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 861/2007, nr 650/2012, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1393/2007

51%

Rylski, P. , Weitz K. , Wołodkiewicz B.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2019

|

tom 28

|

nr 4

941-1014

EN

Over the past two years the Court of Justice of the EU has delivered several important judgments on legal instruments forming the framework of the so-called judicial cooperation in civil matters. Therefore, international civil procedure law remains one of the most vigorous areas of the European integration. The two-part article contains a detailed and comprehensive study of the ECJ’s acquis within the framework of basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all “Brussels” Regulations, the Insolvency Regulation (No 1346/2000), the Succession Regulation (No 650/2012), the Small Claims Regulation (No 861/2007), etc. The authors pay close attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union; they try not only to analyse the technical matters raised by the respective cases pending before the Court of Justice, but also to highlight the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.

13

Przegląd orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z zakresu europejskiego prawa procesowego cywilnego (2015–2016) – rozporządzenie nr 2201/2003, nr 4/2009, nr 805/2004, nr 1896/2006, nr 1346/2000 i nr 1393/2007

51%

Pilich M. , Rylski P. , Weitz K.

Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego

|

2017

|

tom 26

|

nr 4

913-993

EN

In the two recent years the Court of Justice of the EU delivered a number of important judgments pertaining to legal instruments within the framework of the so-called Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The two-part article is the detailed and profound study of the ECJ's acquis within the framework of the basic legal instruments underpinning the EU Common Judicial Area, including all the 'Brussels' Regulations (Regulation No. 44/2001 and Regulation No. 1215/2012, the Small Claims Regulation No. 861/2007, the Insolvency Regulation No. 1346/2000, etc. The authors pay much attention to the mechanisms of cooperation between Member States and the Union, trying not only to look into the technical matters raised by the respective cases before the Court of Justice but also highlighting the importance of some underlying constitutional and international aspects.