Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

2 Rejent

2 Jelonek-Jarco B.

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Wyodrębnianie nieruchomości lokalowej - zagadnienia z praktyki

100%

Jelonek-Jarco B.

Rejent

2021

nr 8 (364)

50-69

The article deals with the most recent (of 2017, 2018 and 2019) amendments of the Premises Ownership Act of June 24, 1994 as they created many doubts regarding an assessment as to when a premises is self-contained and when the staroste may issue a certificate confirming this fact. The main problems discussed in the paper are: (i) whether and when it is possible to establish a premises in a building with only one premises, (ii) whether it is possible to issue a certificate of a self-contained premises, which was defined in the building permit as a utility room, (iii) whether it is possible to establish one premises under several buildings, as well as (iv) whether and what impact the establishment of an easement has on a self-contained premises.

Jeszcze o wzruszalności domniemań z art. 3 u.k.w.h. - uwagi na kanwie wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 10.01.2020 r. (I CSK 451/18)

100%

Jelonek-Jarco B.

Rejent

2022

nr 8 (376)

32-49

The commented judgment of the Supreme Court discusses the admissibility of rebutting the presumption of conformity of a mortgage entered in the land and mortgage register with the actual legal status. A question arises whether this presumption may be rebutted only in special proceedings regulated in Article 10 of the Land and Mortgage Registers Act of 1982 or in any other proceedings - especially in proceedings for payment initiated by a creditor against the owner of the real property. In the commented judgement the Supreme Court decided that the second option is correct even though the entry of a mortgage into the land and mortgage register is of a constitutive nature. In the opinion of author of this study opinion this is a correct position because there are no bases for distinguishing entries depending of their nature - constitutive or declaratory. Additionally the author discusses the possibility of rebutting the presumption concerning other rights (of a constitutive nature) as, for example, perpetual usufruct.