In the article, the author points to an interesting aspect of e-business models development – namely „intercepting” the value of new technologies and the ability to „unblock” the hidden (potential) values brought by technology. The paper describes the development of consumer finance services and discusses so called two- or multi-sided markets. In addition, the author presents three areas of innovation in retail payment: innovative payment instruments, canals and manners of payment as well as innovative forms of money.
The complexity and uncertainty in the application of the European system of financial supervision is due to the fact that its particular concepts were implemented at different times. First, it was the system of European financial supervisors (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA), which was primarily aimed at coordination of national activities. Then, the European Banking Union was established, comprised of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), and the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), as well as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) which must also be seen in the context of assistance to troubled banks. Difficulties of interpretation are further compounded by a lack of consistency in approach to the institutions subject to examination. Should they include only the euro zone, or the whole EU, only the banks or other institutions as well? If you take into account the SSM, SRM or ESM, it is often not very clear who and when should act what tools should be applied, For example, when the ECB may, and should, correct decisions of national supervisors and what, in the context of increasing involvement of the ECB in the banking union, is the role of the ESRB; whether and when banks can possibly challenge decisions eg. on establishing a capital buffer or inclusion on the SIFI list, etc. Also unclear is the role of the EBA and ESMA in the context of the creation of a banking union, SSM, SRM and ESM and delegation of regulatory powers of ECB and the Commission to regulatory agencies (Meroni doctrine) or creation of regulatory agencies beyond the Treaty (Pringle doctrine).
This article presents the concept of information supervision in the context of corporate governance, supervision and management of IT in the enterprise information systems. The definition of information supervision proposed by the author can highlight the difference between supervision of IT systems, and information systems. The presented model of information supervision can serve both to analyze, and to shape deliberately the information supervision in an enterprise. Announcing further research on the concept and model of information supervision the author shows, that particularly interesting seem to be searching for methods to measure the maturity of information supervision, and the application of specific rules and mechanisms of such supervision impact on the company efficiency.
PL
Na szczycie przywódców państw G-20 w Pittsburghu w 2009 r. zaproponowano reformę infrastruktury rynku derywatów, przez wprowadzenie obowiązku centralnego rozliczania najbardziej wystandaryzowanych kontraktów pochodnych, będących przedmiotem obrotu poza rynkiem regulowanym. Uznano bowiem, że transakcje pozagiełdowe miały istotny wpływ na rozprzestrzenienie się kryzysu finansowego i wymagają większej kontroli. W efekcie, w USA została wprowadzono ustawa Dodd-Frank Act, a Unia Europejska przyjęła rozporządzenie w sprawie instrumentów pochodnych będących przedmiotem obrotu poza rynkiem regulowanym, kontrahentów centralnych i repozytoriów, tzw. rozpo-rządzenie EMIR. Artykuł zawiera ekonomiczną analizę prawa przyjętych regulacji rynku finansowego, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem instytucji kontrahentów centralnych i repozytoriów transakcji.
The aim of the following article is to present the issues of the planned legal regulation of a new, specific category of the participant of payment services market - third-party payment service provider. This is a “third” entity in relation to the user of basic payment service (namely, payer and receiver) as well as to the provider of the payment services - an account-holding institution. Introduction of this term into European Union legislation is one of the most significant changes in the project of a new Payment Services Directive (PSD II). Particularly important in this context is the need for exact definition of legal status of the third-party payment service providers as well as precise determination of the boundaries of their responsibility. Emerging of such entities improves the process of payment and intensifies the competition between banks. Yet, it also cause some problems related to the privacy protection or forgery prevention. The consequences of the before mentioned regulation for providers and users of payment services have been discussed in the present article.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.