This article is devoted to the research of international experience of public-private partnership (PPP) within sport projects realization, as well as the development of ways how to solve the corresponding problems. The concept of “infrastructure development contract” is substantiated. The international experience of PPP for implementing projects in the field of sports (Singapore, India, Denmark, Poland, South Africa) has been analyzed. It has been proved that Denmark had negative experience while Farumís Sport Arena had been constructed. Mostly it caused by the fact that the structure of the contractual management was too complicated for the control of the mayor of the city, and also by the fact that PPP at that time were a relatively new phenomenon for central government bodies. In addition, there was no effective regulation of PPP, especially at the level of municipalities. The main reason for the failed experience of PPP in Farum, experts called the violation of regulations issued by the European Union in terms of regulation of tenders and implementation of contracts. The legal status of World Sports Alliance (WSA) has been investigated. The author insists that attraction of such sport organizations to PPP for projects’ implementation in the sphere of sport will allow partners to make risks’ and responsibilities’ allocation in the most economically effective way. The author concludes that definition of “infrastructure development contract” should be implemented into Ukraine’s legislation. Herewith “infrastructure development contract” is a long-term (from 5 to 50 years) cooperation between the state of Ukraine, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, united territorial communities represented by the relevant state bodies and local self-government bodies (state partners) and legal entities, except state and communal enterprises, or individuals – entrepreneurs (private partners) carried out on the basis of the contract or on the basis of the reversal of a special economic organization of a corporate type (economic association). This cooperation implies the construction, modernization, maintenance of infrastructure facilities at the expense of funds and the industrial/scientific potential of the private partner during the term of the contract/economic organization, while the ownership of the assets and the authority to monitor the proper fulfillment of obligations (“term-quality”) transferred to the public partner. The contractor’s sources of income under the life cycle contract are compensation payments from the concedent for the construction and operation of a sports facility as an object of state ownership.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.