Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 12

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
PL
A breakthrough in the political activity of Władysław Konopczyński took place in 1922 and involved winning the seat of a parliamentary deputy from the Popular–National Union ticket. Subsequently, Konopczyński remained in the Sejm of the Republic of Poland during a whole term of office (1922–1927), frequently speaking about education and schools of higher learning, and presenting motions concerning copyright, a statue on the freedom of assembly, and, predominantly, the introduction of the numerus clausus at universities and polytechnics. In 1925–1939 Konopczyński became actively involved in a struggle against the Piłsudskiites and reacted to the May 1926 coup d’état in a series of press articles criticising both the Marshal and his supporters. This uncompromising stance earned him many enemies within the ruling circles. The political career pursued by Konopczyński was not long–lasting; in 1930 he failed in the election to the Senate, and five years later resigned from all political endeavours due to his disapproval of the dictatorial tendency within the National Party. On the eve of the Second World War Konopczyński was an adherent of the Front Morges political alliance.
EN
The article discusses Jagiellonian University Professor Adam Vetulani’s efforts to reactivate the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences between 1956 and 1958, which failed due to the hostility of the communist authorities and the praesidium of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw. For his activities, Vetulani paid not only with a long-term ban on foreign travels (to the detriment of Polish sciences) and the fact that he did not become a full member of the Polish Academy of Sciences but also with long-term surveillance by the communist security services.
PL
Artykuł omawia działania profesora Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Adama Vetulaniego na rzecz reaktywacji Polskiej Akademii Umiejętności w latach 1956–1958. Zakończyły się one niepowodzeniem na skutek nieprzychylności komunistycznych władz i prezydium Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Warszawie. Za swoją działalność Vetulani zapłacił nie tylko wieloletnimi zakazami wyjazdów zagranicznych (ze szkodą dla polskiej nauki) oraz tym, że nie został członkiem rzeczywistym PAN, ale także długotrwałą inwigilacją przez PRL-owskie służby bezpieczeństwa.
EN
Władysław Konopczyński (1880–1952) established contacts with Lviv with the help of Simon Askenazy, his master, who was a professor there. Under the direction of this researcher he wrote in 1908 his doctorate thesis titled Poland in the era of the Seven Years’ War. In 1910, after criticizing the book about bishop Kajetan Sołtyk written by Askenazy’s student, Kazimierz Rudnicki, he moved from Lviv to Cracow. There he received his habilitation in 1911. A year after receiving veniam legendi at the Department of Philosophy at the Jagiellonian University he settled in Cracow, limiting his contacts with Lviv to a minimum. He re-established them only after the First World War, when, as a delegate of the Cracow branch of the Polish Historical Society, he often joined the meetings of the General Board. But then his contacts with Lviv had the character of only short, casual meetings devoted to such actions as the organization of Polish Biographical Dictionary, the election of the Board of the Society and publishing activities. After 1910 the historian never stayed in the city over the River Poltva for longer.
4
100%
Dzieje Najnowsze
|
2022
|
tom 54
|
nr 2
153-175
EN
The article discusses the surveillance of Adam Vetulani, a professor of the Jagiellonian University, by the Cracow Security Service (SB) within the operational case ‘Venice’, directed against former activists of the Polish People’s Party (PSL) in contact with Professor Stanisław Kot, who was in exile. Apart from Vetulani, the group also included Professors Henryk Barycz, Jan Hulewicz, Ignacy Zarębski, and Jerzy Zathey. The surveillance, which lasted for 28 years, did not bring any visible results, apart from the tormenting of Vetulani and his closest family.
PL
Artykuł omawia inwigilację profesora Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Adama Vetulaniego przez krakowską SB w ramach sprawy operacyjnego rozpracowania „Wenecja”, skierowanej przeciwko byłym działaczom PSL pozostającym w kontakcie z przebywającym na emigracji prof. Stanisławem Kotem. W grupie tej obok Vetulaniego znaleźli się też profesorowie Henryk Barycz, Jan Hulewicz, Ignacy Zarębski i Jerzy Zathey. Trwająca przez 28 lat inwigilacja nie przyniosła żadnych widocznych rezultatów, poza zadręczeniem Vetulaniego i jego najbliższej rodziny.
PL
This article discusses the relation of the eminent Polish historian Władysław Konopczyński (1880–1952) to the newly established communist rule. As president of the Commission of History of the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences, the editor-in-chief of the Polish Biographical Dictionary, and one of the few internationally known Polish historians who survived the war, the old Konopczyński enjoyed much prestige among his colleagues and in the Polish academia in general. For this and the other reasons indicated in the paper, the communist authorities choose him as the symbol of the ‘bourgeois’ scholarship and decided to discredit him and get rid of his person. The paper presents the ways in which the government exercised pressure on the scholar and his colleagues, causing Konopczyński’s resignation from all his posts, and depriving him the opportunities to teach and publish. Finally, the moral and practical results of this campaign on the historian’s collaborators and colleagues are analysed.
PL
Autor niniejszego tekstu skoncentrował się na działalności Władysława Konopczyńskiego w Polskim Towarzystwie Historycznym w okresie dwudziestolecia międzywojennego, którą przedstawił w świetle dziennika uczonego i jego listów. Przez cały ten okres Konopczyński był spiritus movens tej organizacji. Potrafił tchnąć życie w skostniały krakowski oddział PTH i zainspirować członków do zbiorowych wysiłków badawczych. Na konferencji w kwietniu 1920 r. zaprezentował program utworzenia ogólnopolskiej organizacji historyków z centralą we Lwowie. Jego pomysłowi środowisko krakowskie pozostało wierne przez cały okres dwudziestolecia międzywojennego. Pomimo rozlicznych inicjatyw i niespożytej energii, jego działalność w Towarzystwie nie była wolna od konfliktów. Ich początek datuje się na rok 1928, kiedy to stronnicy sanacji wbrew opinii krakowskiego historyka przegłosowali nadanie Józefowi Piłsudskiemu członkostwa honorowego PTH. Do kolejnego sporu doszło dwa lata później, podczas przygotowań do V Zjazdu Historyków Polskich w Warszawie. Organizatorzy poprosili o patronat nad zjazdem Piłsudskiego, pełniącego wtedy funkcję prezesa rady ministrów, co doprowadziło do demonstracyjnego opuszczenia kongresu przez Konopczyńskiego. Z kolei za pierwszej prezesury Franciszka Bujaka uczony bronił pozycji ośrodka krakowskiego przed hegemonistycznymi zakusami Warszawy. Zrezygnowawszy za szefostwa Ludwika Kolankowskiego z członkostwa w Zarządzie Głównym i wiceprezesury krakowskiego oddziału, do działalności w Towarzystwie Konopczyński powrócił dopiero po 1945 r. Władysław Konopczyński’s Activity in the Polish Historical Society (1913–1939)The author focused on the activity of Władysław Konopczyński for the Polish Historical Society in the interwar years, presented in the light of the scholar’s diary and letters. Throughout all the interwar period the historian was the spiritus movens of the Society, and was able to breathe new life into the fossilized Cracow branch of the PHS and inspire its members to a collective research effort. At a conference in April 1920 he presented a programme for the formation of a Poland-wide organisation for historians with its centre in Lvov. The Cracow community of scholars remained loyal to his idea throughout the whole interwar period. Despite his numerous initiatives and indefatigable energy, Konopczyński’s activity in the Society was not without tensions and conflicts. Their beginning dates to 1928 when supporters of the Sanacja regime, against the historian’s will, voted for an honorary membership to the PHS for Józef Piłsudski. Two years later, another controversy erupted during the preparations for the Fifth Convention of Polish Historians in Warsaw. The organisers invited Piłsudski, at that time Chairman of the Council of Ministers, to take the patronage of the convention, and this provoked Kopczyński to ostentatiously leave the congress session. Next, under the first presidency of Franciszek Bujak, the historian defended the position of the Cracow branch against hegemonic designs of Warsaw. And it was not until 1945 that Konopczyński, who under the presidency of Ludwik Kolankowski resigned from the General Board and vice-presidency of the Cracow branch, resumed his activities in the Society.
EN
During Poland’s twenty years of independence after the Great War the basic of functioning of the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences were acres given by Archduke Karol Stefan Habsburg, Paweł Tyszkowski and Władysław Józef Fedorowicz. They were almost 20,000 hectares big and they consisted of three parts: forests, constructional areas and granges. Thanks to the income gained the Academy experienced the economic boom and its administrator, Stanisław Kutrzeba, could proudly say in 1938 that in the years of such market conditions it allocated one million złoty for scientific aims.
EN
Objectives To determine the age and the most common circumstances for smoking initiation along with smoking rates and to evaluate smoking trends for secondary and high school students in Poland during 2009 and 2011. Material and Methods In 2009, a pilot study was conducted in districts of Poland on high school students and their parents. For statistical analysis, correctly completed questionnaires from 999 students and 667 parents were qualified for use. After the pilot study, a nationwide study of secondary school students and their parents was also conducted in 2009. For statistical analysis, correctly completed questionnaires were used from 9360 students and 6951 from their parents. The research tool was a questionnaire developed by the Chief Sanitary Inspectorate. These studies were then compared to the nationwide research study from 2011. Questionnaires were obtained from a survey of 3548 students from secondary schools and 4423 of those from high schools. Results Smoking initiation usually begins at ages 12–15 years. Rates of secondary school student smoking at least once in their lifetime were about the same level in the surveyed years (2009 – 9%, 2011 – 11%), whereas rates of high school student smoking increased (2009 – 15%, 2011 – 24%). Moreover, 34% of secondary school student smoked less than once a week, whereas in 2009, only 8% of students had done so. For high school students, a 1/2 smoked every day; similar to 2009. Students usually smoked in parks, on streets or any other open space areas. Conclusions From analyzing the smoking trends over the survey period it can be concluded that the problem of smoking increases with respondent age. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2017;30(5):763–773
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.