Home economics and the way it functions is now a priority area in the daily lives of all people running households. Negative behaviors in these households, not only of a nutritional nature, have had an impact on global issues. Is being eco-friendly today a necessity or rather an individual preference? What optics define (and do they define) the changes in homeeconomics? How is this happening and in what direction? These issues were the topics of essays developed by first-year sociology students at the Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW) in 2021. They were preceded by the presentation of the International Federation for Home Economics (IFHE), which has been at the vanguard of change in the field of home economics for over 100 years of its existence.
PL
Domowa ekonomia i sposób jej funkcjonowania to obecnie priorytetowa sfera życia codziennego wszystkich ludzi prowadzących gospodarstwa domowe. Negatywne zachowania nie tylko o charakterze żywieniowym w tych gospodarstwach, wywarły wpływ na problemy globalne. Czy bycie dzisiaj "eko" to konieczność, czy raczej poziom indywidualnych preferencji? Jaka optyka definiuje (i czy definiuje) zmiany w domowej ekonomii, w jaki sposób się to dokonuje i w jakim kierunku? Te właśnie zagadnienia stanowiły tematy esejów opracowanych przez studentów pierwszego roku socjologii SGGW w Warszawie w roku 2021. Poprzedzała je prezentacja organizacji IFHE (International Federation for Home Economics), która przez ponad 100 lat swojego istnienia znajduje się w awangardzie zmian na polu domowej ekonomii.
Updating German heritage, especially on former Regained Lands, is related to the complex process of reminding (bringing back) multicultural past of Poland in transformation conditions — democratization and public spirited social life after 1989. This process refers to Poland as a whole, as well as regional and local one too. It concerns both practices revealing open regional policy accepting German heritage on western and northern parts of Poland and contrary ones typical for closed regional policy. In the first case due to open regional policy there appear in public sphere (are reminded) both German heritage — history and memory of Germans as former inhabitants of these territories, and those traditions, especially Polish thoughts related to the west, which used to serve the battle against the Germanization practices as well as promotion of Polish north and west as traditional Polish areas. However, advocates of closed regional policy, contradicting the updating of German heritage on these lands, express demand in politicians and social activist speeches as well as scientists, the re-Polonization of Wrocław, Gdańsk and Szczecin memories. In both cases the keyword is dispute associated with shaping open-closed regional policy concerning the former Regained Lands and arguments which are expressed in this dispute. Appealing to history and memory of Polish western and northern lands and to results of social inquires (carried out by us and other research groups) we present the process of forming the open regional policy in western and northern parts of Poland.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.