Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.
Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Ograniczanie wyników
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
|
|
nr 7(10)
291-306
EN
The essential problem discussed in this paper is the use of rhetorical figures, symbol, and allegory in Young Poland Literature. In the discourse of literary criticism of this period authors expressed their intentions to replace allegory, which was associated with traditional, widely-held ways of creating meanings, with symbol, which was considered modern and polysemous. Surprisingly, the artistic practice did not follow these theoretical declarations as writers still frequently used allegorical constructions. In the article, the author tries to analyse the reasons of this state of affairs using theories of Walter Benjamin, Paul de Man and Gayatri Spivak. As an example of difficulties in the replacement of allegory by symbol in the period of Young Poland, the author proposes an interpretation of Stanisław Wyspiański’s drama Liberation. In this work, the poet criticizes the dependency of Polish culture at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries on the ideas of Romanticism (this quality is also condemned by Stanisław Brzozowski, commentator and interpreter of Wyspianski’s works). Contemporary readers, despite the greatest acknowledgement for the author of The Wedding, did not accept the poet’s ideas. The reasons for this was readers’ hunt for symbolic meanings where the author used plain allegories.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.