Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

3 Daniluk P.

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

O młodocianym w ujęciu kodeksu karnego

100%

Daniluk P.

2014

nr 2 (198)

121-142

The article is devoted to a specific category of offenders i.e. juveniles. Firstly, the legal definition of the juvenile, provided under Art. 115 § 10 of the Criminal Code, is analyzed, making a distinction between the notion of the juvenile and the notion of the minor. Then the grounds for the special treatment of juvenile offenders are examined. A special attention is paid to the presumption of lesser degree of juvenile’s guilt and their susceptibility to be affected, which constitutes a good prospect for their education (reformation, reclamation). Finally, the criteria on the basis of which it is established whether an offender is a juvenile offender or not, are analyzed. A special attention is given to the criterion which states that a juvenile is an offender who has not reached the age of 24 years at the time of the trial in the first instance.

Amnestia i jej konstytucyjne uwarunkowania

100%

Daniluk P.

2014

nr 3(122)

43-76

The article establishes the meaning of the concept of amnesty and provides characteristics of the act of amnesty. The author proves that, despite the fact that the Constitution lacks the provision relating explicitly to the possibility of adoption of the amnesty law by the parliament. Article 10 in conjunction with Article 173 and Article 175 para. 1 of the Constitution are no obstacle in this respect. He also points to, inter alia, the doubts as to whether amnesty may be extended to include disciplinary penalties, and demonstrates the inadmissibility of the inclusion in the amnesty law of regulation involving the conversion of legally imposed penalties on another, more lenient, punishment. Moreover, the author claims that the interest of the victim is not — in principle — an obstacle to grant amnesty. However, amnesty should not interfere in civil-law interests of the victim that are included in the fi nal judgment.

Gloss to the Decision of the Constitutional Tribunal of 28 January 2020 (K 22/16, OTK-A 2020, Item 9)

100%

Daniluk P.

nr 3

The paper contains critical commentary on the Constitutional Tribunal decision of 28 January 2020 (K 22/16). The author proves that Article 108 § 2 of the Penal Code of 1969 is still in force. Therefore, the compliance of this article with the Polish Constitution should be examined by the Constitutional Tribunal.

W tekście zawarto krytyczny komentarz do postanowienia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 28 stycznia 2020 r. (K 22/16). Autor wykazuje, że art. 108 § 2 Kodeksu karnego z 1969 r. nadal obowiązuje i w związku z tym jego konstytucyjność powinna zostać poddana merytorycznej kontroli Trybunału Konstytucyjnego.