Rynek wewnętrzny UE poprzez wprowadzenie swobód gospodarczych, wspólnotowe regulacje prawne i liberalizację tworzy specyficzne warunki dla funkcjonowania przedsiębiorstw. Celem artykułu jest przeprowadzenie analizy obecnego stanu realizacji zasad wspólnego oraz jego potencjalnego oddziaływania na tworzenie wartości przedsiębiorstw. Pierwsza część zawiera analizę skutków rynku wewnętrznego UE oraz polityki na rzecz wspierania przedsiębiorczości dla podmiotów gospodarczych, z uwzględnieniem zarówno aspektów teoretycznych, jak również bezpośrednich skutków po wprowadzeniu Programu 92 w życie. Dalsze badania obejmują analizę stanu obecnego oraz kierunki zmian i strategię na rzecz urzeczywistnienia współczesnego jednolitego rynku europejskiego. Kluczowym aspektem jest próba udzielenia odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy współczesny rynek wewnętrzny UE to źródło korzyści dla przedsiębiorstw i bezpiecznych warunków dla prowadzenia działalności gospodarczej, czy źródło zagrożeń i niekorzyści osłabiających potencjał podmiotów europejskich.
2
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
W warunkach współczesnej, globalnej i opartej na wiedzy gospodarki światowej pozytywne efekty jednoczesnej współpracy i konkurencji przedsiębiorstw w klastrach dla tworzenia ich wartości sąbardzo istotne. Dogłębna analiza efektów współpracy w klastrach i wzrost zainteresowania tymi ugrupowaniami niejako prowokuje do podjęcia dyskusji nad kształtem i zakresem polityki wspierania klastrów. Pomimo ogromnego wzrostu zainteresowania tym obszarem, termin polityki promocji klastrów wciąż pozostaje do końca nierozpoznany. Celem artykułu jest podjęcie rozważań na temat zadań, zasad i roli polityki wspierania i promocji klastrów w kontekście efektów wynikających z jednoczesnej współpracy i konkurencji przedsiębiorstw. Dyskusji poddane zostają kwestie: jak powinna wyglądać polityka wspierania ugrupowań klastrowych i czy zawsze powinna uwzględniać te same instrumenty i taką samą rolę instytucji publicznych oraz badawczo-rozwojowych i edukacyjnych we wspieraniu regionalnego biznesu? Czy polityka wspierania klastrów powinna być dynamiczna i realizowana w oparciu o zarządzanie systemowe i na jakim poziomie? W analizie wykorzystane zostały doświadczenia krajów UE w zakresie realizacji polityki wspierania klastrów.
3
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
Proper identification and use of competitive advantages, which reveal not only the effectiveness of potential management, but also the opportunities and threats from the environment is a very important aspect of the enterprise strategy in the modern economy. Business environment, inextricably linked to its location and containing in itself both elements of the industrial and the macroeconomic environment is being constructed within the region and its ability to create a competitive and conducive business related areas. The competitiveness of regions is being built today, with the participation of key actors of the economy such as business, science and government (the concept of the Triple Helix). The regions have the potential, creating by: specialized companies, often integrated in clusters, R&D institutions with knowledge infrastructure, business climate with enterprise policy and people climate. The essence of the modern concept of constructing the regional competitive advantages is the ability to manage its potential with the use of regional systems of innovation. The role of these systems is the optimum combination and use of the triple helix partners potential, research and application of knowledge and organizational control. The aim of the analysis is undertaken to highlight the role of constructing the regional competitive advantages in the creation of enterprise value and to determine the potential of Polish regions to build relations of cooperation between enterprises, public and research institutions. The paper presents the knowledge based approach that generation and use requires a dynamic interplay and transformation of tacit and encoded knowledge.
The aim of the paper is to evaluate the status of current implementation of the European Union Internal Market Programme, with particular emphasis on the implementation of the common market gaps at Community and national levels. Moreover, future trends of a single European market development – as a tool to ensure the maintenance of high, long-term and permanent competitive position of the EU, particularly unstable within the current crisis of the monetary union – were indicated. The first part of the paper is devoted to the analysis and evaluation of the Internal Market assumptions and rules and its implementation over the past decade – from the official implementation of the Program to the present years determinate by the effects of the economic crisis. In the next stage, a strategy for further development of the single market were proposed.
5
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
The economic crisis it is a rapid economic downturn. National economies are increasingly intertwined through trade and capital what results in fast transmission of the crisis between countries. The crisis results mainly in the deteriorating financial situation of enterprises and in the increase of unemployment, the deterioration in consumer confidence and the reduction of purchases. Under such an unstable macroeconomic environment European companies were forced to review their strategies and maintain a high flexibility for their reactions to changes in the environ- ment. The promotion of competitiveness of European enterprises has become the priority of public regional, national and supranational authorities. Any initiatives hads and still have a great role in building a sustainable and permanent competitive position of the European companies. Companies operating in the European Union are in a unique situation, because they might receive a direct and indirect support to combat the negative effects of the crisis and to enhance their competitiveness on both the national and Community levels. The European companies are offered a wide range of support in the form of the pan-European networks and services, as well as the financial programmes. This results in new opportunities for the effective functioning of European companies and in the improvement of their competitiveness in a difficult period of economic crisis and beyond.
Research background: Innovations are introduced by competitive companies. One of the most common methods, increasingly used by companies, is organizing clusters or cluster initiatives operating within a specialized sector, competing with each other, exploiting the potential of cooperation and its impact on creating new business ideas. However, these efforts could be unviable due to the lack of an effective leader of the group. One should underline a crucial role of the leader in such an organized network, since the leader makes improvements and takes initiatives for all the network and its partners. These concepts prompt us to undertake the research on the role of clusters? characteristics on enhancing willingness to innovate in general. This study aims to point out the main characteristics of clusters and to investigate their impact on companies? innovativeness. The main problem to address is the magnitude of specific effects that might boost introducing new solutions in firms? networks. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of factors describing cluster environment (characteristics like cooperation within clusters and beyond them, incentives of a leader, and localization factors) that might affect the innovativeness of companies. Methods: The authors collected data using questionnaire. This type of primary source enables the authors to construct a model consisting of latent variables such as incentives of coordinator of cluster or cluster initiative, cooperation of firms with local authorities, cooperation between entrepreneurs, or localization. The results are subject to the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analysis. Findings & value added: The conducted analysis leads to several findings. Firstly, incentives provided by the cluster coordinator enable companies to increase the willingness to introduce innovations in general. Secondly, however, the influence of other cluster characteristics on the propensity to innovate for firms functioning within specific Polish business clusters is scant. These findings point to the fact that actions leading to assign the official coordinator of a cluster need to be done, as it should result in better flow of knowledge, more symmetric information among companies within cluster, and more productive and innovative way of functioning firms in general. Regarding innovation clusters (and regional innovation systems), these actions need to be supported by forming policy on regional level, because effective clusters would induce more competitive regional economy in long-term scenario.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.