Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Kompetencja sądu administracyjnego do uznania w wyroku uprawnienia lub obowiązku wynikających z przepisów prawa

100%

Ciesielska A.

Studia Prawa Publicznego

|

2019

|

nr 4(28)

27-51

EN

The purpose of the article is to present the competence of the administrative court indicated in Article 146 § 2 of the Act of 30 August 2002 – the Law on proceedings before administrative courts (LPAC). In accordance with this provision, in matters concerning complaints against an Act or an action related to public administration referred to in Article 3 § 2 point 4 of the LPAC, the court may recognize in its judgment a right or an obligation arising from the provisions of law and may issue a relevant decision in the matter if it first annuls the act or declares that the action is with no legal effect pursuant to Article 146 § 1 of the LPAC. It must be emphasized however, that Article 146 § 2 of the LPAC is not an independent basis for issuing a judgment and the doctrine often presents differing views. It should be assumed that the court may recognize the right or the obligation of an individual that arises from the provisions of law if the nature of the case permits doing so and when the facts and the legal framework of the case do not raise reasonable doubts. Unfortunately, judicial case studies show that this possibility is rarely used. Furthermore, courts encounter numerous problems in applying Article 146 § 2 of the LPAC, most probably because of the huge controversy regarding this procedural institution. Firstly, there is no consensus as to the function of the judicial decision based on the provision in question, and the interpretation of its facultative nature is also problematic. In the author’s opinion administrative courts should use the competence referred to in Article 146 § 2 of the LPAC more frequently. Such a change of practice would increase the effectiveness of judicial review of public administration as well as will enhance the level of protection of individual rights. The article also contains some interesting examples of the application of Article 146 § 2 of the LPAC.

2

Program Rodzina 500+ – sukces czy porażka?

100%

Ciesielska A.

Roczniki Ekonomii i Zarządzania

|

2018

|

tom 10(46)

|

nr 1

7-20

PL

Artykuł powstał na bazie dwuletnich obserwacji, badań terenowych oraz analizy danych zastanych, upublicznionych przez Główny Urząd Statystyczny i Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej. Uzyskane informacje pozwoliły określić efektywność programu z perspektywy zarówno państwa, jak i beneficjentów środków pomocowych. Jego celem jest uświadomienie, że to, co na pierwszy rzut oka wygląda korzystnie, może w perspektywie dłuższego czasu przynieść nieodwracalnie negatywne skutki. Niniejszy artykuł ma na celu wskazać, jak istotna dla kolejnych pokoleń jest dokładna analiza skutków działań podejmowanych przez decydentów. Istotą artykułu jest uwypuklenie rangi kanału dystrybucji środków pomocowych oraz próba odpowiedzi na pytania: Czy wprowadzenie programu Rodzina 500+ jest w stanie przyczynić się do zniwelowania już obserwowalnych skutków niżu demograficznego? Czy w perspektywie długookresowej program ma szanse na powodzenie i realizację ministerskich założeń? Program Rodzina 500+ jest nowatorską inicjatywą państwa, mającą na celu zainicjowanie procesu łagodzenia skutków kryzysu demograficznego w Polsce, a jednocześnie zmniejszenie ubóstwa wśród dzieci.

XX

The article is based on two-year observations, field studies and analysis of existing data, published by the Central Statistical Office and the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy. The information obtained allowed to determine the effectiveness of the program from the perspective of both the state and beneficiaries of aid funds. Its aim is to make people aware that what looks good at first glance may bring irreversible negative effects in the long term. This article aims to show how important for the next generations is a thorough analysis of the effects of actions taken by decision-makers. The essence of the article is to emphasize the importance of the distribution channel for assistance funds and to try to answer the following questions: Is the introduction of the Family 500+ program capable of contributing to the alleviation of the already observable effects of the demographic decline? In the long-term perspective, does the program stand a chance of success and implementation of the ministerial assumptions? The Family 500+ program is an innovative state initiative aimed at initiating the process of mitigating the effects of the demographic crisis in Poland, and at the same time reducing poverty among children.

3

Z problematyki zakazu reformationis in peius w postępowaniu sądowoadministracyjnym

100%

Ciesielska A.

Studia Prawa Publicznego

|

2017

|

nr 2 (18)

123-157

EN

The principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius is established in Article 134 § 2 of the Law on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts. According to this provision the administrative court is not allowed to issue a decision to the detriment of the complainant. A judgment adverse to the complainant can be exceptionally issued but only if the court fi nds a violation of the law resulting in the annulment of the challenged act or action. This principle is a procedural institution which ensures that the complainant’s situation will not deteriorate due to the decision of the administrative court. There are many interpretative doubts concerning the prohibition of reformatio in peius in the doctrine and the jurisdiction of the administrative courts. This is because administrative courts very rarely issue a decision on the merits. Decisions of administrative courts are basically of cassation nature. When the administrative court allows a complaint, the contested act is generally eliminated from the system of law and the case is returned for re-examination by the public administrative authority. It is therefore very diffi cult to determine the content of the prohibition of reformatio in peius in administrative court proceedings and in practice the prohibition of a change for the worse is not a real guarantee of the protection of the interests of the complainant. In the author’s opinion, the way of approaching the mechanism of application of the prohibition of reformatio in peius by the administrative courts needs to be changed. And yet, a signifi cant improvement in the eff ectiveness of the protection against the worsening of the complainant’s legal situation will only be possible through the introduction of a new legal regulation restricting the jurisdiction of public administrative authority, which will reconsider the case after the cassation judgment issued by the administrative court.