Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 12

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In realist philosophy, analogy is a basic way of knowing the wealth of the world of persons and things as well as protects human knowledge against reductionism. Analogical knowledge is grounded on the analogical way beings exist, that is, is genetically and structurally combined with things. Analogy allows to cognitively encompass both particular things and the whole of the world of nature and culture, while saving the plurality of beings composing it. A theory of the meaning of linguistic terms, built on analogy, yields a basis for apprehending the deepest structure of a thing in the meaning of a given name, since it points to the necessary internal organization of the content of a denoted thing, which decides for the name that it properly and adequately understands a denoted thing.
PL
Analogia na terenie filozofii realistycznej jest podstawowym sposobem poznania bogactwa świata osób i rzeczy i chroni ludzkie poznanie przed redukcjonizmem. Poznanie analogiczne jest ugruntowane na analogicznym sposobie istnienia bytów, a zatem jest genetycznie i strukturalnie związane z rzeczą. Analogia pozwala ogarnąć poznawczo tak poszczególne jednostkowe rzeczy, jak i całość oraz złożoność świata natury i kultury, nie tracąc równocześnie z pola widzenia zróżnicowania istniejących w nim bytów. Nabudowana na analogii teoria znaczenia terminów językowych daje podstawę ujęcia w znaczeniu danej nazwy najgłębszej struktury rzeczy, gdyż wskazuje na koniecznościowy układ treści znaczonej rzeczy, a co stanowi o właściwym i adekwatnym rozumieniu oznaczanej przez nazwę rzeczy.
FR
En philosophie réaliste, l’analogie est un mode basique de connaissance de la richesse du monde des personnes et des choses. Elle protège la connaissance humaine contre le réductionnisme. La connaissance analogique est enracinée dans le mode analogique de l’existence des êtres. Elle est donc liée aux choses de manière génétique et structurelle. L’analogie permet de réunir cognitivement aussi bien les choses particulières que la totalité et la complexité du monde de la nature et de la culture, tout en préservant la pluralité des êtres qui la composent. La théorie du sens des termes linguistiques, bâtie sur l’analogie, constitue le fondement de la conception de la structure la plus profonde de la chose du sens d’une dénomination, puisqu’elle montre une disposition nécessaire du contenu de la chose dénotée, ce qui est capital pour sa compréhension appropriée.
2
Content available BONUM SEQUITUR ESSE
100%
EN
The article discusses the connection of the good with being along three steps. First, it briefly considers the history of the word “good” to see what is hidden behind it and to what one should direct his or her thoughts and searches. Second, it looks at the beginning of inquiries on the nature and sources of the good. Three, it analyzes the originality of one of the most interesting solutions in this controversy surrounding the good, which appeared in the thirteenth century and which was contained in the short sentence, “bonum sequitur esse rei”—the good is a consequence of the existence of a thing.
EN
This article discusses different ways of understanding compositions of being, and different methods for discerning them. It considers non-metaphysical (physical, scientistic, phenomenological, abstractionist) interpretations in order to decide whether metaphysics can use them to discover and gain knowledge of the elements that determine the deepest structure of beings, and which set their mode of being. The paper also shows how much the metaphysical method for discerning the compositions of being is different from non-metaphysical methods.
EN
The article shows the way in which the discovery of the existence of the Absolute is made in existential metaphysics. This existential metaphysics provides us with knowledge about reality. It shows the content of the experience of being, the content given to us in the transcendentals. It also unveils the foundation of the rational order, which is given to us in the discovery of the first principles of the existence of being and of cognition. Metaphysics provides us also with knowledge concerning the structure of being. It shows us being as composite and plural; being which is “insufficient” in its structure and calls for an explanation. That being—that is problematized in existence, given to us in experience, and incompletely intelligible in itself—lifts us toward its ultimate “complement” and understanding, to the Absolute.
EN
The author attempts to answer three questions: 1) What is metaphysics, with its intention to become the i rst among sciences, also among natural ones; 2) Is there any necessary relations/connection between metaphysics, natural science and theology (which partly means also relations between faith and reason); 3) In what way metaphysics can be used in natural sciences (also in theology) and how do these sciences benei t from it? In reply to the i rst is- sue, the author has stressed that metaphysics is an interpretation of persons, animals, plants and other things. A relationship between metaphysics and natural sciences, which is the problem discussed in the second part of the article, is necessary when a naturalist (and also a theologian) uses the results of his research to built a certain world view. Discussing the third question, the author shows that metaphysics, natural sciences and theology could cooper-ate in constructing an integral image of the world and man, form an adequate terminology to name particular problems, making people aware of the limits of research methods and teaching a principle of freedom in doing research in order to defend science from being ideology-oriented.
EN
When we see in the world the fact that there are many beings, and we indicate that the particular beings exist in a compositional way, we face the task of learning about a new problem: how can we define and determine the relations between beings and between the elements within a being? Although the theory of participation has roots that go back to Plato, and so to a philosophy in which the pluralism of being was rejected and which accepted an identity-based conception of being, participation finds its ontological rational justification only (and ultimately) in the pluralistic and compositional conception of being. With the description of participation as a “descending road” in the cognition of being, we are restricting ourselves to the presentation of how participation is understood in realistic metaphysics (while we shall leave aside the history of the question). We will show the aspects of participation that provide a foundation for wisdom-oriented cognition, and we will show the specific character of participation-oriented cognition as a “descending road.”
7
Content available On the Transcendental Properties of Real Beings
100%
EN
The article analyzes the metaphysical approach to the rational cognition of the world of persons and things. It shows the way in which metaphysicians reveal the essential and universal properties of the world and the laws that govern their being. Among these properties, the most important are as follows: to be a thing (that is, to have a concretely determined essence), to be one (that is, to be non-contradictory in itself), to be separate or distinct (that is, to be sovereign in being), and also to be a vehicle of truth, good, and beauty. Among the laws of being, in turn, the article indicates the law of identity, the law of non-contradiction, the law of the excluded middle, the law of the reason of being, the law of finality, and the law of perfection. These laws primarily show the source and foundation of the rational order.
PL
Ontologia nowożytna, jako oddzielna dyscyplina filozoficzna (obok metafizyki, a właściwie w jej miejsce), powstała na bazie późnej scholastyki i kartezjańskiego racjonalizmu. Pojawienie się nowej nazwy, która początkowo traktowana była jako synonim nazwy metafizyki, nie było zabiegiem czysto werbalnym. Wraz ze zmianą nazwy dokonuje się zmiana przedmiotu, metody i celu poznania metafizycznego. Artykuł pokazuje proces podmiany przedmiotu metafizyki, którym był realnie istniejący byt na pojęcie obiektywne, które jest jego reprezentacją oraz na istotę wewnętrznie niesprzeczną. Przedstawiony został również proces wyrugowania nazwy „metafizyka” i zastąpienia jej nazwą „ontologia” oraz przeniesienia problematyki metafizycznej na płaszczyznę fizyki.
EN
All philosophers, beginning with the pre-Socratics, through Plato and Aristotle, and up to Thomas Aquinas, accepted as a certain that the world as a whole existed eternally. The foundation for the eternity of the world was the indestructible and eternal primal building material of the world, a material that existed in the form of primordial material elements (the Ionians), in the form of ideas (Plato), or in the form of matter, eternal motion, and the first heavens (Aristotle). The article outlines the main structure of the philosophical theory of creation ex nihilo developed by St. Thomas Aquinas and indebted to his metaphysical thought. It shows the wisdom-based and ratiocinative foundation of the rational cognition of reality—reality that comes from the personal creative act of God. It concludes that the perception that the beings called to existence by the personal act of God the Creator are intelligible is the ultimate rational justification for the fact that our human cognition, love, and spiritual creativity are rational.
10
Content available Metaphysics in the Lublin Philosophical School
63%
EN
The article is aimed at presenting the way in which metaphysics is understood and cultivated in the Lublin Philosophical School, Poland. It includes such topics as: the definition of metaphysics, metaphysical cognition (its object and the method for singling it out), ways of metaphysical demonstration and rational justification, and the relation of metaphysics to other domains of philosophy. In the light of the information delivered, it can be concluded that metaphysics in the Lublin Philosophical School is understood as a way of knowing in which the reason employs the universal laws of being and thought and strives to discover the first and singular factors or causes that render free of contradiction that which exists and which is given to us in a germinal way in the empirical intuition of the material world.
EN
The article is concentrated on the Lublin Philosophical School which came into being in the institutional framework of the Department of Philosophy at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland; it describes its achievements, which took place at different stages of the School’s development, as well as the School’s new initiatives and challenges. The development of the School was connected with the involvement of new people and successive generations of new students who joined in the cultivation of realistic philosophy. One can regard the years 1950–1966 as the first stage of the School’s development, in which the School’s program was formulated. The following stages are the years 1967–1980, and 1981–2004, and the years that follow, in which new generations of students who take up inquiries in the spirit of the School’s program arrive. The article also explains the reasons why today the Lublin Philosophical School cannot be identified with the Department of Philosophy of the Catholic University of Lublin, but rather with a special style of cultivating philosophy.
EN
The article is focused on the Lublin Philosophical School; it explains its name, presents its founders, reveals the causes of its rise, and introduce the specific character of the School’s philosophy. It starts with stating the fact that in the proper sense, the term “Lublin Philosophical School” describes a way of cultivating realistic (classical) philosophy developed in the 1950s by a group of philosophers at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland. The Lublin Philosophical School is characterized by cognitive realism (the object of cognition is really existing being), maximalism (taking up all existentially important questions), methodological autonomy (in relation to the natural-mathematical sciences and theology), transcendentalism in its assertions (its assertions refer to all reality), methodological-epistemological unity (the same method applied in objectively cultivated philosophical disciplines), coherence (which guarantees the objective unity of the object), and objectivity (achieved by the verifiability of assertions on their own terms, which is achieved by relating them in each instance to objective evidence). The term is the name of the Polish school of realistic (classical) philosophy that arose as a response to the Marxism that was imposed administratively on Polish institutions of learning, and also as a response to other philosophical currents dominant at the time such as phenomenology, existentialism, and logical positivism.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.