Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Reliability and validity of Simmonds’ physical performance task battery among Nigerians with chronic low-back pain

100%

Adegoke B. O. A. , Ologun T. I. , Mbada C. E. , Odole A. C.

2015

tom 19(4)

5-12

Wstęp: Badania dotyczące niezawodności i trafności baterii testów sprawności fizycznej wśród pacjentów cierpiących z powodu przewlekłego bólu dolnego odcinka kręgosłupa (Chronic Low Back Pain, CLBP) nie są liczne, natomiast badania takie obejmujące Nigeryjczyków praktycznie nie istnieją. Rzetelność powtarzalności testu, trafność zbieżna konstruktu i trafność w aspekcie różnic międzygrupowych dla baterii zadań Simmondsa oceniających sprawność fizyczną (Simmonds Physical Performance Task Battery, SPPTB) były badane na grupie Nigeryjczyków z przewlekłym bólem dolnego odcinka kręgosłupa (CLBP). Materiał i metody: Niniejsze korelacyjne badanie przekrojowe przeprowadzone zostało wśród 40 kolejno zrekrutowanych pacjentów z przewlekłymi bólami dolnego odcinka kręgosłupa i 40 zdrowych, dopasowanych do grupy pacjentów pod względem wieku i płci członków grupy kontrolnej. Wszyscy badani wykonali baterię zadań Simmondsa w dwóch różnych sytuacjach, ale tylko pacjenci z chronicznym bólem dolnego odcinka kręgosłupa ukończyli Kwestionariusz Oswestry dot. bólu w dolnym odcinku kręgosłupa (Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, OLBPDQ). Dane zostały przeanalizowane przy użyciu wnioskowania statystycznego na poziomie istotności α = 0,05.

Introduction: Studies on reliability and validity of physical performance test batteries among patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) are generally sparse and specifically non-existent for Nigerians. Test-retest reliability, convergent construct validity and known-group validity of the Simmonds Physical Performance Tasks Battery (SPPTB) were investigated among Nigerians with CLBP. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional correlation study involved 40 consecutively recruited patients with CLBP and 40 apparently healthy age – and sex-matched controls. All participants performed the SPPTB on two different occasions but only CLBP patients completed the Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBPDQ). Data were analyzed using inferential statistics at 0.05 alpha level. Results: The Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) coefficients for test-retest of SPPTB were 0.75-0.99 for CLBP patients. Correlations (r) between OLBPDQ scores and scores on each of the performance tests on the SPPTB ranged from 0.39 to 0.42. There were significant differences (p= 0.00) in SPPTB scores between patients with CLBP and apparently healthy controls. Conclusion: Simmonds physical performance task battery is a reliable and valid functional assessment tool but may not sufficiently discriminate between persons with or without low-back pain. Correlations between self-reported physical functional capacity and patients’ performance on the test battery were weak to moderate.

Selected Physical Fitness Parameters in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Apparently Healthy Controls: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

51%

Ogunlana M. O. , Lateef R. O. , Oyewole O. O. , Raimi T. H. , Alimi T. J. , Adesina O. , Odole A. C. , Faniyi O. , Ayodeji A. F. , Adebimpe B. D. , Afolabi W. , Adepoju M. O. , Ogunsola B. F.

Journal of Physical Education & Health - Social Perspective

2022

tom 11

nr 19

13-22

Objective: The study aimed to compare the physical fitness of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (ST2DM) and apparently healthy non-diabetic controls (NDC). Methods: Thirty-two ST2DMs and 32 NDCs were recruited for a comparative cross-sectional study. Flexibility, balance, power, and strength were assessed using sit-up and sit and reach (SR), one leg stand, horizontal jump (HJ), and hand grip tests, respectively. Cardiovascular endurance was assessed using Vo2max estimated with a 6-minute walk test. Also, body composition was estimated using body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), and percent body mass. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The alpha level was set at p < 0.05. Results: Static balance was significantly higher in the NDCs (11.1 ± 12.6 vs 5.5 ± 5.0 sec; p = 0.047) than in the ST2DMs. Hand (34.6 ± 19.9 vs 23.6 ± 12.7 kg; p = 0.001) and leg (122.4 ± 42.8 vs 26.5 ± 43.9 cm; 0.001) strength/power were significantly higher in the NDC group compared with the ST2DM. The SR test, a measure of flexibility, was significantly higher in the NDC (SDM = 12.2 ± 19.8cm, NDC = 35.3 ± 8.8cm, p = 0.001). BMI (28.7 ± 4.3 vs 26.4 ± 41kgm-2; p = 0.048), WC (104.2 ± 8.0 vs 94.2 ± 8.7cm; p = 0.001) and WHR (1.0 ± 0.6 vs 0.9 ± 0.7; p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the ST2DM than in the NDC. There was no significant difference in the estimated VO2max between the subject group and the control group. Conclusion: Balance, flexibility, and strength were significantly lower, while measures of adiposity are significantly higher in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with non-diabetic controls.