Editorial: The Geography and Governance of Infrastructure Provision

• Autorzy: Martina Schorn , Alois Humer
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Infrastructure matters for regional development as well as for the individual wellbeing of people. This not only became painstakingly obvious since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020. Thus, the phases of 'lock-down' during the pandemic became an eye opener for the condition of infrastructural fundaments of our cities and regions. Debates about systemic infrastructure for maintaining the functioning of our societies and economies - in scientific terms 'Services of General Interest' or the 'Foundational Economy' - received wide societal and political attention since the outbreak of the pandemic. Yet, already before the outbreak of this most severe global health crisis, discourses in applied social sciences have experienced an 'infrastructural turn', putting technical, social and green infrastructures into the centre of attention of social research, theory building and dissemination. This has led to different understandings of 'infrastructure' coexisting in academic and professional debates today. This introductory paper to the issue on 'The Geography and Governance of Infrastructure Provision' aims at giving an overview of current debates about infrastructure provision in Regional Science and Planning while introducing the six papers included in this theme issue of Europa XXI. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarządzanie; Infrastruktura; Zróżnicowanie regionalne; Usługi użyteczności publicznej

EN

Management; Infrastructure; Regional diversity; Public utility services

• Czasopismo: Europa XXI
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 41 The Geography and Governance of Infrastructure Provision
• Strony: 5-17

Twórcy

autor

Martina Schorn

• University of Vienna, Austria

autor

Alois Humer

• University of Vienna, Austria

Bibliografia

• Adam Hernández, A., & Schneider, C. (2021). Experimenting for long-term transformation. Key insights into 20 years of German pilot schemes for innovative rural public service and infrastructure provision. Europa XXI, 41, 107-128. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2021.41.5
• Addie, J.-P. D., Glass, M. R., & Nelles, J. (2020). Regionalizing the infrastructure turn: A research agenda. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1701543
• Ahlqvist, T., & Moisio, S. (2014). Neoliberalisation in a Nordic State: From Cartel Polity towards a Corporate Polity in Finland. New Political Economy, 19(1), 21-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.768608
• Bjørnsen, H.M., Foss, O., & Johansen, S. (2015). The concept and definition of SGI. In H., Fassmann, D., Rauhut, E.M., da Costa & A., Humer (Eds.). Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion (pp. 49-72). Vienna: V&R Unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737004718.49
• Carse, A. (2017). Keyword: Infrastructure - How a Humble French Engineering Term Shaped The Modern World. In P., Harvey, C., Jensen & A., Morita (Eds.). Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Routledge Companion (pp. 27-39). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622880
• Coenen, L., & Morgan, K. (2020). Evolving geographies of innovation: Existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 74(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065
• Colomb, C., & Santinha, G. (2014). European Union Competition Policy and the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An Impossible Reconciliation? State Aid Rules and Public Service Liberalization through the European Spatial Planning Lens. European Planning Studies, 22(3), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.744384
• Cowie, P., Townsend, L., & Salemink, K. (2020). Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution? Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.042
• da Costa, E.M., Palma, P., & da Costa, N.M. (2015). Regional Disparities of SGI provision. In H., Fassmann, D., Rauhut, E.M., da Costa & A., Humer (Eds.). Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion (pp. 91-122). Vienna: V&R Unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737004718.91
• Engelen, E., Froud, J., Johal, S., Salento, A., & Williams, K. (2017). The grounded city: From competitivity to the foundational economy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(3), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx016
• ESPON (2020): Geography of COVID-19 outbreak and first policy answers in European regions and cities. Policy Brief, December 2020. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/GEOCOV%20final%20report.pdf
• Fassmann, H., Rauhut, D., da Costa, E.M., & Humer, A. (2015a). Introduction: Contextual, legal and policy perspectives on Services of General Interest. In H., Fassmann, D., Rauhut, E.M., da Costa & A., Humer (Eds.). Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion (pp. 11-24). Vienna: V&R Unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737004718.11
• Fassmann, H., Rauhut, D., da Costa, E.M., & Humer, A. (Eds.). (2015b). Services of general interest and territorial cohesion: European perspectives and national insights. Vienna: V&R Unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737004718
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2009). Survival of the unfittest: Why the worst infrastructure gets built - and what we can do about it. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3), 344-367.
• Franz, Y., & Humer, A. (2021). EU Cohesion Policy: Towards grounded cities and regions. In D., Rauhut, F., Sielker & A., Humer (Eds.). EU Cohesion Policy and Spatial Governance: Territorial, Social and Economic Challenges (pp. 216-229). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839103582.00028
• Furlong, K. (2020). Geographies of infrastructure 1: Economies. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3), 572-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519850913
• Glass, M.R., Addie, J.-P.D., & Nelles, J. (2019). Regional infrastructures, infrastructural regionalism. Regional Studies, 53(12), 1651-1656. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1667968
• Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075954
• Grimes, S. (2003). The digital economy challenge facing peripheral rural areas. Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph421oa
• Gruber, E., Fassmann, H., & Humer, A. (2015). Demographic change changing SGI demands: The example of Austria. In H., Fassmann, D., Rauhut, E.M., da Costa & A., Humer (Eds.). Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion (pp. 149-166). Vienna: V&R Unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737004718.149
• Gruber, E., Rauhut, D., & Humer, A. (2019). Territorial cohesion under pressure? Welfare policy and planning responses in Austrian and Swedish Peripheries. Papers in Regional Science, 98(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12344
• Humer, A. (2014). Researching Social Services of General Interest: an analytical framework derived from underlying policy systems. Journal of European Spatial Research and Policy, 21(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2014-0006
• Humer, A., & Granqvist, K. (2020). The gradual city-ness and town-ness of public service locations: towards spatially sensitive sector policies. Geoforum, 113, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.008
• Humer, A., & Palma, P. (2013). The provision of Services of General Interest in Europe: regional indices and types explained by socio-economic and territorial conditions. Europa XXI, 23, 85-104. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.5
• Humer, A., Rauhut, D., & Fassmann, H. (2015). Drivers of the Provision of SGI. In H., Fassmann, D., Rauhut, E.M., da Costa & A., Humer (Eds.). Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion (pp. 73-90). Vienna: V&R Unipress. https://doi-org.uaccess.univie.ac.at/10.14220/9783737004718.73
• Komornicki, T. (2013). Editorial. Europa XXI, 23, 5-5.
• Lacher, E. (2021). Electricity Provision as a European Service of General Economic Interest - a conceptual debate. Europa XXI, 41, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2021.41.1
• Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
• Latham, A., & Layton, J. (2019). Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass, 13(7), e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12444
• Ludlow, D., & Rauhut, D. (2013). Services of General Interest: Policy challenges and policy options. Europa XXI, 23, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.4
• MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O'Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional 'development' for 'left behind' places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034
• Malý, J. (2018). Questioning territorial cohesion: (Un)equal access to services of general interest. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12250
• Mattila, H., Purkarthofer, E., & Humer, A. (2020). Governing 'places that don't matter': agonistic spatial planning practices in Finnish peripheral regions. Territory, Politics, Governance. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1857824
• Meehan, K.M. (2014). Tool-power: Water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum, 57, 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.08.005
• Meier, S. (2021). Homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies and action plans of the Berlin Senate. Europa XXI, 41, 129-151. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2021.41.7
• Milstein, A. (2015). The Legal Aspects of SGI. In H., Fassmann, D., Rauhut, E.M., da Costa & A., Humer (Eds.). Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion (pp. 27-48). Vienna: V&R Unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737004718.27
• Monstadt, J., & Coutard, O. (2019). Cities in an era of interfacing infrastructures: Politics and spatialities of the urban nexus. Urban Studies, 56(11), 2191-2206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019833907
• Rauhut, D., & Humer, A. (2020). EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth: Trajectories in economic thought. European Planning Studies, 28(11), 2116-2133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1709416
• Reeves, M. (2017). Infrastructural Hope: Anticipating 'Independent Roads' and Territorial Integrity in Southern Kyrgyzstan. Ethnos, 82(4), 711-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1119176
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don't matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
• Rogelja, I. (2020). Concrete and coal: China's infrastructural assemblages in the Balkans. Political Geography, 81, 102220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102220
• Sá Marques, T., Saraiva, M., Ribeiro, D., Amante, A., Silva, D., & Melo, P. (2020). Accessibility to services of general interest in polycentric urban system planning: The case of Portugal. European Planning Studies, 28(6), 1068-1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1658718
• Salento, A., & Pesare, G. (2016). Liberalisation and Value Extraction. The Trajectory of Railways in the Neo-Liberal State. PArtecipazione e COnflitto, 9 (2), 466-494. https://doi.org/10.1285/I20356609V9I2P466
• Santinha, G., Dias, A., Rodrigues, M., Rodrigues, C., Bastardo, R., Pavão, J., & Pacheco Rocha, N. (2021). Smart Cities and Urban Logistics: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Europa XXI, 41, 37-58. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2021.41.2
• Schorn, M., Franz, Y., Gruber, E., & Humer, A. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic: Impetus for place- and people-based infrastructure planning. Town Planning Review, 92(3), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.83
• Sielker, F., & Kaufmann, E. (2020). The influence of the Belt and Road Initiative in Europe. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1), 288-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1790411
• Stroissnig, U. (2021). Digitization in Austrian small-town regions: opportunities and risks for spatial planning and development. Europa XXI, 41, 59-76. https://doi.prg/10.7163/Eu21.2021.41.3
• Świątek, D., Komornicki, T., & Siłka, P. (2013). Services of General Interest: Empirical evidence from case studies of SeGI project. Europa XXI, 23, 105-129. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.6
• Tent, N., Brad, A., Klöden, J., Adam Hernández, A., Bannert, J., & Gebauer, A. (2021). A review of the challenges and strategies of delivering services of general interest in European rural areas. Europa XXI, 41, 77-105. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2021.41.4
• Wiśniewski, R., Stępniak, M., & Szejgiec-Kolenda, B. (2021). Accessibility of public services in the age of ageing and shrinking population: Are regions following trends. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 103(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2021.1903334

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2021.41.6