Prawna ochrona tajemnicy spowiedzi w Stanach Zjednoczonych

• Autorzy: Jurzyk Marek
• Języki publikacji: PL

Słowa kluczowe

PL

wolność sumienia i religii; wolność sumienia i wyznania; Stany Zjednoczone; relacje państwo-kościół; prawo wyznaniowe; Kościół katolicki; Duchowny; tajemnica spowiedzi

• Wydawca: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Czasopismo: Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego
• Rocznik: 2001
• Tom: 3
• Strony: 3-50

Twórcy

autor

Jurzyk Marek

• Włocławek

Bibliografia

• A. Bevilacqua, Card., Confidentiality Obligation of Clergy from the Perspective of Roman Catholic Priests, “Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review” 29(1996), s. 1733-1746.
• A. Skowronek, Sakrament pojednania. Wina – Grzech – Pojednanie, Włocławek 1995, s. 34-35.
• C. Horner, Beyond the Confines of the Confessional: The Priest-Penitent Privilege in a Adverse Society, “Drake Law Review” 45(1997), s. 713.
• C. J. H. Dubbelday, Psychotherapist-Client Testimonial Privilege: Defining the Professional Involved, “Emory Law Journal” 34(1985), s. 777.
• C. R. Steringer, The Clergy-Penitent Privilege in Oregon, “Oregon Law Review” 76(1997), s. 192-194;
• Ch. Wolfram, Modern Legal Ethics, St. Paul, Minn. (West Publishing Co.) 1986, s. 264-266.
• D. S. Brewer, The Right of a Penitent to Release the Confessor From the Seal: Considerations in Canon Law and American Law, “The Jurist” 54(1994), s. 424-476.
• E. Iserzon, J. Starościak, Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Teksty, komentarz, wzory, formularze, Warszawa 19704, s. 173.
• G. C. Hazard, Jr., An Historical Perspective on the Attorney-Client Privilege, “California Law Review” 66(1978), s. 1061-1091.
• H. J. Berman, Prawo i rewolucja. Kształtowanie się zachodniej tradycji prawnej (tłum. S. Amsterdamski), Warszawa 1995, s. 315-331.
• J. A. Sippel, Priest-Penitent Privilege Statutes: Dual Protection in the Confessional, “Catholic University Law Review” 43(1994), s. 1156.
• J. C. Bush, W. H. Tiemann, The Right to Silence: Privileged Clergy Communications and the Law, Abington Press 19893, s. 58-59.
• J. E. Mayes, Strinking Down the Clergymen-Communicant Privilege Statutes: Let Free Exercise of Religion Govern, “Indiana Law Journal” 62(1986/1987), s. 399.
• J. H. Feldman, C. S. Reed, Silences in the Storm: Testimonial Privileges in Matrimonial Disputes, “Family Law Quarterly” 21(1987), s. 194.
• J. H. Miller, Silence Is Golden: Clergy Confidence and the Interaction between Statutes and Case Law, “American Journal of Trial Advocacy” 22(1998), s. 65.
• J. H. Wigmore, Evidence in Trials at Common Law, Boston 1961, t. 8, § 2394, s. 869.
• J. J. Dalessio, Evidentiary Privileges and the Exclusion of Derivative Evidence: Commentary and Analysis, “San Diego Law Review” 26(1989), s. 625.
• J. J. Montone, III, In Search of Forgiveness: State v. Szemple and the Priest-Penitent Privilege in New Jersey, “Rutgers Law Review”, 48 (1995), s. 274-276.
• J. M. Yellin, The History and Current Status of the Clergy-Penitent Privilege, “Santa Clara Law Review” 23(1985), s. 102.
• K. A. Gough, The Conflict Between Confidentiality and Disclosure When a Client Announces Suicidal Intentions: A Proposed Amendment to the Model Ethics Codes, “The Wayne Law Review” 40(1994), s. 1629-1651.
• K. L Ross, Revealing Confidential Secrets: Will It Save Our Children?, “Seton Hall Law Review” 28(1998), s. 964
• K. L. Wallance, Privileged Communications in Sexual Assault Cases: Rhode Island’s Treatment of Clergyman-Parishioner and Psychotherapist-Patient Communications, “Suffolk University Law Review” 28(1994), s. 440-442.
• K. Marszał, Proces karny, Katowice 19985, s. 178-243.
• L. H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, Mineola, New York 19882, s. 1204-1275.
• L. K. Whittaker, The Priest-Penitent Privilege: Its Constitutionality and Doctrine, “Regent University Law Review” 13(2000-2001), s. 149.
• L. L. Brocker, Sacred Secrets: A Call for the Expansive Application and Interpretation of the Clergy-Communicant Privilege, “New York Law School Law Review” 36(1991), s. 476.
• M. C. Regan, Jr., Spousal Privilege and the Meanings of Marriage, “Virginia Law Review” 81(1995), s. 2052-2067.
• M. J. Keel, Law and Religion Collide Again: The Priest-Penitent Privilege in Child Abuse Reporting Cases, “Cumberland Law Review” 28(1997-1998), s. 690-691
• M. J. Mazza, Should Clergy Hold the Priest-Penitent Privilege, “Marquette Law Review” 82(1998), s. 172
• M. Jurzyk, Tajemnica zawodowa adwokatów w systemie prawnym Stanów Zjednoczonych, “Palestra” 5-6(1998), s. 162-180.
• M. Pastuszko, Obowiązki szafarza sakramentu pokuty i pojednania, “Prawo Kanoniczne” 39(1996), nr 1-2, s. 18.
• M. R. Bartel, Clergy Malpractice After Nally: “Touch Not My Anointed, and to My Prophets Do Not Harm”, “Villanova Law Review” 35(1990), s. 535-569.
• Note, Developments in the Law – Privileged Communications, “Harvard Law Review” 98(1985), s. 1454.
• P. R. Rice, Attorney-Client Privilege: The Eroding Concept of Confidentiality Should Be Abolished, “Duke Law Journal” 47(1998), s. 853-898
• R. A. Stefański, w: Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, red. Z. Gostyński, Warszawa 1998, t. 1, s. 478.
• R. C. O’Brien, M. T. Flannery, The Pending Gauntlet to Free Exercise: Mandating That Clergy Report Child Abuse, “Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review” 25(1991), s. 19
• R. F. Miller, Creating Evidentiary Privileges: An Argument for the Judicial Approach, “Connecticut Law Review” 31(1999), s. 772.
• R. J. Araujo, S.J., International Tribunals and Rules of Evidence: The Case For Respecting and Preserving the “Priest-Penitent” Privilege under International Law, “American University International Law Review” 15(2000), s. 653-657.
• R. T. Moriarty, Violation of Confessional Seal and the Associated Penalties, “The Jurist” 58(1998), s. 159.
• S. Goode, M. M. Sharlot, Texas Rules of Evidence Handbook: Part I. Article v: Privileges, “Houston Law Review” 30(1993), s. 489.
• S. Moskowitz, M. J. DeBoer, When Silence Resounds: Clergy and the Requirement to Report Elder Abuse and Neglect, “DePaul Law Review” 49(1999), s. 9-19.
• S. P. Reese, Confidential Communications to the Clergy, “Ohio State Law Journal” 24(1963), s. 60.
• T. Grzegorczyk, J. Tylman, Polskie postępowanie karne, Warszawa 19992, s. 426;
• T. T. Kossegi, B. S. Phair, The Clergy-Communicant Privilege in the Age of Electronic Surveillance, “Saint John’s Journal of Legal Commentary” 12(1996), s. 254-257.
• W. A. Cole, Religious Confidentiality and the Reporting of Child Abuse: A Statutory and Constitutional Analysis, “Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems” 21(1987), s. 40
• J. Bentham, Rationale of Judicial Evidence, (wyd. 1 przez J. S. Milla 1827), Fred B. Rothman & Co. 1995, t. 4, s. 586-592.
• M. H. Mitchell, Must Clergy Tell? Child Abuse Reporting Requirements Versus the Clergy Privilege and Free Exercise of Religion, “Minnesota Law Review” 71(1987), s. 737.