Site-specific Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part I. Site-specific Ground Motion Relations

• Autorzy: Muthuganeisan, P. , Raghukanth, S. T. G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article presents four regional site-specific ground motion relations developed for the state of Himachal Pradesh in northwest Himalaya, situated in a seismically active region. These relations are developed from synthetic free surface ground motion databases obtained from a calibrated stochastic seismological model considering the characteristic properties of this specific region. The adopted methodology incorporates the site effects characterised through active MASW tests conducted in 22 important cities. The estimated ground motion levels from the developed relations are found to be in reasonable agreement with the recorded data.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

PSHA; GMPE; zagrożenia sejsmiczne; Himalaje

EN

PSHA; GMPE; seismic hazard; Himalaya; site coefficients

• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 64, no. 2
• Strony: 336--361
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Muthuganeisan, P.

• Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

autor

Raghukanth, S. T. G.

• Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India,

Bibliografia

• Abrahamson, N.A., W.J. Silva, and R. Kamai (2014), Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1025-1055, DOI: 10.1193/070913EQS198M.
• Atkinson, G.M., and D.M. Boore (1995), Ground-motion relations for eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 1, 17-30.
• Boore, D.M. (1983), Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 6A, 1865-1894.
• Boore, D.M. (2009), Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source groundmotion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99, 6, 3202-3216, DOI: 10.1785/0120090056.
• Boore, D.M., and G.M. Atkinson (1987), Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 2, 440-467.
• Boore, D.M., and J. Boatwright (1984), Average body-wave radiation coefficients, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 5, 1615-1621.
• Boore, D.M., and W.B. Joyner (1997), Site amplifications for generic rock sites, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87, 2, 327-341.
• Boore, D.M., J.P. Stewart, E. Seyhan, and G.M. Atkinson (2014), NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1057-1085, DOI: 10.1193/ 070113EQS184M.
• Brune, J.N. (1970), Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 26, 4997-5009, DOI: 10.1029/ JB075i026p04997.
• Campbell, K.W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2014), NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1087-1115, DOI: 10.1193/062913EQS175M.
• Chiou, B.S.-J., and R.R. Youngs (2014), Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra, Earthq. Spectra 30, 3, 1117-1153, DOI: 10.1193/ 072813EQS219M.
• Hwang, H., and J.-R. Huo (1997), Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 16, 6, 363- 372, DOI: 10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00016-X.
• IBC (2009), 2009 International Building Code, International Code Council, Inc., Country Club Hills, USA.
• Idriss, I.M., and J.I. Sun (1992), SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits. User’s guide, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, USA.
• Iman, R.L., and W.J. Conover (1980), Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment, Commun. Stat. Theor. Meth. 9, 17, 1749-1842, DOI: 10.1080/03610928008827996.
• IS:1893 (2002), Indian standard, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1, 5th rev., Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
• Joyner, W.B., and D.M. Boore (1981), Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 6, 2011-2038.
• Kayal, J.R. (2008), Microearthquake Seismology and Seismotectonics of South Asia, Springer, Dordrecht, Capital Publ. Co., New Delhi.
• Mittal, H., A. Kumar, and R. Ramhmachhuani (2012), Indian national strong motion instrumentation network and site characterization of its stations, Int. J. Geosci. 3, 6A, 1151-1167, DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2012.326117.
• Mohanty, W.K., R. Prakash, G. Suresh, A.K. Shukla, M.Y. Walling, and J.P. Srivastava (2009), Estimation of coda wave attenuation for the national capital region, Delhi, India using local earthquakes, Pure Appl. Geophys. 166, 3, 429-449, DOI: 10.1007/s00024-009-0448-7.
• Motazedian, D., and G.M. Atkinson (2005), Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95, 3, 995-1010, DOI: 10.1785/0120030207.
• Muthuganeisan, P., and S.T.G. Raghukanth (2016), Site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part II. Hazard estimation, Acta Geophys., DOI: 10.1515/acgeo-2016-0011.
• NDMA (2011), Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India, Technical Report, Working Committee of Experts (WCE), National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), New Delhi, India.
• Park, C.B., R.D. Miller, and J. Xia (1999), Multichannel analysis of surface waves, Geophysics 64, 3, 800-808, DOI: 10.1190/1.1444590.
• Saragoni, G.R., and G.C. Hart (1973), Simulation of artificial earthquakes, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2, 3, 249-267, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290020305.
• Singh, S.K., R.S. Dattatrayam, N.M. Shapiro, P. Mandal, J.F. Pacheco, and R.K. Midha (1999), Crustal and upper mantle structure of Peninsular India and source parameters of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur earthquake (Mw = 5.8): Results from a new regional broadband network, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89, 6, 1631-1641.
• Singh, S.K., D. García, J.F. Pacheco, R. Valenzuela, B.K. Bansal, and R.S. Dattatrayam (2004), Q of the Indian shield, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 4, 1564- 1570, DOI: 10.1785/012003214.
• Toro, G.R., N.A. Abrahamson, and J.F. Schneider (1997), Models of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 1, 41-57, DOI: 10.1785/ gssrl.68.1.41.
• Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry (1991), Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response, J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 117, 1, 89-107, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410 (1991)117:1(89).

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na
działalność upowszechniającą naukę

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/acgeo-2016-0010