The impact of background category information on the creation of social cliques: The role of need for cognitive closure and decisiveness

• Autorzy: Marcin Bukowski , Grzegorz Sędek , Małgorzata Kossowska , Mariusz Trejtowicz

Abstrakty

EN

This article focuses on the role of need for cognitive closure in the process of mental model creation about social relations (i.e. social cliques). We assumed that high (vs. low) need for closure participants tend to rely on background category information when forming social cliques. We predicted that this tendency to employ categorical information as a mental aid, used in order to form social cliques, would be efficient in simple task structures (where category information overlaps with the mental model structure) but would lead to increased error rates in complex task structures (where category information is inconsistent with the model structure). The results confirmed our predictions, showing especially strong effects for the decisiveness component of need for closure. The importance of individual differences in need for closure and decisiveness in social reasoning is discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social mental models; categorization; need for cognitive closure; decisiveness

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk
• Czasopismo: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 43
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 12-19

Daty

wydano

2012

Twórcy

autor

Marcin Bukowski

• Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Al. Mickiewicza 3, Kraków

autor

Grzegorz Sędek

• Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ul. Chodakowska 19/31, Warszawa

autor

Małgorzata Kossowska

• Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Al. Mickiewicza 3, Kraków

autor

Mariusz Trejtowicz

• Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Al. Mickiewicza 3, Kraków

Bibliografia

• Bar-Tal, Y. (1994). The effect on mundane decision-making of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure.European Journal of Personality, 8, 45-58.
• Bar-Tal, Y., & Guinote, A. (2002). Who exhibits more stereotypical thinking? The effect of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure on stereotyping.European Journal of Personality, 16, 313-331.
• Bar-Tal, Y., & Kossowska, M. (2010). The efficacy at fulfilling need for closure: The concept and its measurement. In John P. Villanueva (Ed.),Personality Traits: Classification, Effects and Changes(pp. 47-64). New York: Nova Publishers.
• Bates, D. M. (2010).lme4: Mixed-effects modelling with R.Book available at:http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/book/
• Bukowski, M., von Hecker, U., & Kossowska, M. (2011). The role of need for cognitive closure in the construction of social mental models. Unpublished manuscript, Jagiellonian University, Poland.
• Dechesne, M., Schultz, J. M., Kruglanski, A. W., Orehek, E., & Fishman, S. (2008). A psychology of borders: Need for closure and the allure of group impermeability. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Maryland, MD, USA.
• de Dreu, K., Koole, S., & Oldersma, F. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362.
• Dijksterhuis, A. P., Van Knippenberg, A. D., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schaper, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254-270.
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007).Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models.New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M. and the ABC Research Group (1999).Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Heider, F. (1958).The psychology of interpersonal relations.New York: Wiley.
• Hummert, M. L., Crockett, W. H., & Kemper, S. (1990). Processing mechanisms underlying use of the balance schema.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 5-21.
• Jiang, J. (2007).Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. Springer Series in Statistics.New York: Springer.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Kossowska, M. (2003). Różnice indywidualne w motywacji poznawczej (Individual differences in cognitive motivation).Przegląd Psychologiczny, 46, 355-375.
• Kossowska, M. (2010). Poznawcze i motywacyjne źródła nabywania wiedzy. (Cognitive and motivational sources of knowledge formation). In: A. Kolańczyk & B. Wojciszke (red.).Motywacje umysłu(Motivations of the mind) (pp. 15-28). Sopot: Smak Słowa.
• Kossowska, M. & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservatism in Western and Eastern Europe.Political Psychology, 24, 501-518.
• Kossowska, M., Van Hiel, A., Chun, W.Y. & Kruglanski, A. (2002). The need for cognitive closure scale: structure, cross-cultural invariance, and comparison of mean ratings between European-American and East Asian Samples.Psychologica Belgica, 42, 267-286.
• Kruglanski, A. W. (2004).The psychology of closed mindedness.New York: Psychology Press.
• Kruglanski, A., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and un-freezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212-225.
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing".Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
• Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A., Taris, T., & Bezinovic, P. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: Comparing its structure in Croatia, Italy, USA and The Netherlands.British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 139-156.
• R Development Core Team. (2008). R:A language and environment for statistical computing.R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available fromhttp://www.R-project.org
• Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: The impact of urgency and permanence tendencies.Psychologica Belgica, 46, 235-252.
• Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2007). Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the need for closure scale.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 266-280.
• Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2006). The dimensional structure of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: Relationships with ‘seizing’ and ‘freezing’ processes.Social Cognition, 24, 22-45.
• Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In: D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.),The Handbook of Social Psychology.(pp. 391-445). New York, Oxford: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
• von Hecker, U. (1997). How do logical rules help to construct social mental models?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 367-400.
• von Hecker, U., Crockett, W., Hummert, M. L., & Kemper, S. (1996). Social cliques as mental models.European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 741-749.
• von Hecker, U., & Dutke, S. (2004). Integrative social perception: Individuals low in working memory benefit more from external representations.Social Cognition, 22, 336-365.
• von Hecker, U., & Sędek, G. (1999). Uncontrollability, depression and the construction of mental models.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 833-850.
• Wichary, S., Kossowska, M., Orzechowski, J., Ślifierz, S, Marković, J. (2008). Individual differences in decisiveness: Pre-decisional information search and decision strategy use.Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39, 47-53.
• Wichary, S., Orzechowski, J, Kossowska, M., Ślifierz, S, Marković, J., & Bukowski, M. (2005). Strategie decyzyjne a funkcjonowanie pamięci roboczej (Decision making strategies and working memory).Studia Psychologiczne, 43, 97-102.
• Webster, D. & Kruglanski, A. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 261-271.
• Wyer, R. S. Jr., & Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information.Psychological Review, 106, 89-118.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10059-012-0002-9

Biblioteka Nauki

430172