How Do People Resolve Conflict Between Implicit and Explicit Attitudes?

• Autorzy: Norbert Maliszewski

Abstrakty

EN

How do implicit attitudes influence behavior when they are in conflict with explicit attitudes? In Study 1, smokers’ negative implicit attitudes and positive explicit attitudes towards smoking were activated. Then emotions were measured. The stronger the negative implicit attitudes that the smokers held, the stronger the conflict experienced. Study 2 showed that cognitive capacity allows for this conflict, as positive explicit and negative implicit attitudes may be applied simultaneously. The stronger the negative implicit attitudes the smokers held, the stronger the conflict experienced. Smokers resolved the conflict through the inhibition of implicit attitudes (by smoking cigarettes). Without cognitive capacity, only implicit attitudes were applied, and thus no conflict was aroused. Study 3 confirmed that smoking cigarettes inhibited negative implicit attitudes.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

implicit attitudes; Implicit Association Test; cognitive capacity; influence of attitudes on behavior

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk
• Czasopismo: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 42
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 36-45

Daty

wydano

2011

Twórcy

autor

Norbert Maliszewski

• University of Warsaw

Bibliografia

• Ajzen, I., Sexton, J. (1999). Depth of Processing, Belief Congruence and Attitude Behavior Correspondence, [w:] S. Chaiken i Y. Trope (red.),Dual processes theories in social psychology(pp. 117-138). New York: Guilford.
• Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. A. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798 - 844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
• Banse, R., Seise, J., Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT.Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145-160.
• Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: the case against the controlobility of automatic stereotype effects, [w:] S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (red.),Dual processes theories in social psychology(s. 339-360). New York: Guilford.
• Blaskovich, J., Ernst, J. M., Tomaka, J., Kelsey, R. M., Salomon, K. L., & Fazio, R. H. (1993). Attitude Accessibility as a Moderator of Autonomic Reactivity During Decision Making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 2, 165 - 176.
• Chaiken, S., & Yates, S. (1985). Affective-Cognitive Consistency and Thought-Induced Attitude Polarization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 6, 1470 - 1481.
• Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C.L (2004b). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces.Psychological Science, 15, 806-813.
• Davidson, A. R., Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude-behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1364-1376.
• Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping, [w:] S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (red.),Dual processes theories in social psychology(s. 339-360). New York: Guilford.
• Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliot, A. J. (1991). Prejudice With and Without Compunction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830.
• Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The Regulation of Explicit and Implicit Race Bias: The Role of Motivations to Respond Without Prejudice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835-848.
• Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publisher
• Epping-Jordan, M. P., Watkins, S. S., Koob, G. F., & Markou, A. (1998). Dramatic decreases in brain reward function during nicotine withdrawal.Nature, 393, 76-79.
• Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? [w:] R. M. Sorrentino i E. T. Higgins (red.),Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior(s. 204-243). New York: Guilford Press.
• Fazio, R. H., & Dunton, B. C. (1997). Categorization by Race: The Impact of Automatic and Controlled Components of Racial Prejudice.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 451-470.
• Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in Automatic Activation as an Unobtrusive Measure of Racial Attitudes: A Bone Fide Pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 6, 1013-1027.
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbomatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the Automatic Activation of Attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 2, 229-238.
• Fazio, R. H., Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The Mode Model of Attitude-Behavior Processes, [w:] S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (red.),Dual processes theories in social psychology(s. 339-360). New York: Guilford.
• Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The Trouble of Thinking: Activation and Application of Stereotypic Beliefs.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 4, 509-517.
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychological Review, 102, 4 - 27.
• Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2001). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
• Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at Age 3.Zeitschrift fur experomentelle psychologie, 48, 85-93.
• Grenhoff, J., & Svensson, T. H. (1989). Pharmacology of Nicotine.British Journal of Addiction, 84, 477-492.
• Harrison, A. A., Liem, Y. T., & Markou, A. (2001). Fluoxetine combined with a serotonin-1A receptor antagonist reversed reward deficits observed during nicotine and amphetamine withdrawal in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology, 25, 55-71.
• Karpinski, A., Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774 - 788.
• Marsh, K. L., Johnson, B. T., & Scott-Sheldon, L. A. (2001). Heart Versus Reason in Condom Use: Implicit Versus Explicit Attitudinal Predictors of Sexual Behavior.Zeitschrift fur experomentelle psychologie, 48, 85-93.
• McConnell, A. R., Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.
• Moskowitz, G. E., Golwllitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious Control of Stereotype Activation through Chronic Egalitarian Goals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1, 167 - 184.
• Murray, J. B. (1991). Nicotine as a Psychoactive Drug.Journal of Psychology, 125, 1, 5-25.
• Nosek, B. A. i Banaji, M. R. (2002). (At least) two factors moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. (w:) R. K. Ohme i M. Jarymowicz (red.), Natura Automatyzmow. Warszwa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN.
• Plant, E. A. i Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832.
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the Orienting Value of Attitudes: Attitude Accessibility as a Determinant of an Object's Attraction of Visual Attention.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 2, 198 - 211.
• Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and in-group share desirable traits.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178.
• Swanson, J. E., Rudman, L. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to Investigate Attitude-Behavior Consistence for Stigmatized Behavior.Cognition and Emotion, 15, 207-230.
• Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Boston: Badge
• Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A Model of Dual Attitudes.Psychological Review, 107, 1, 101 - 126.
• Wojciszke, B. (2000). Postawy i ich zmiana, [w:] J. Strelau (red.),Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki.T. 3, s. 80-106. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10059-011-0006-x

Biblioteka Nauki

430843