The impact of explicit and implicit power motivation on educational choices

• Autorzy: Norbert Maliszewski , Anna O. Kuźmińska , Grażyna Wieczorkowska-Wierzbińska , Anna Werner-Maliszewska

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of three studies was to examine the differences between business majors and non-business majors, in their level of implicit (measured by an Implicit Association Test [IAT], Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwarz, 1998) and explicit power motivation (measured by Power Motivation and Helping Power Motivation scales, Frieze & Boneva, 2001).It was predicted that there are no differences between these two groups in the general (implicit) level of power motivation, but that differences exist in the way it is explicitly expressed: through desire for leadership and prominence vs. desire for helping. Results of Study 1 indicated that business majors (management, N=79) declared a higher leadership motive and a lower helping motive than non-business majors (history, psychology, linguistics, N=62).Study 2 addressed question whether the above differences in power motivation stem from socialization at the university level or from pre-selection. The relationship between high school students’ (N=134) academic major preferences and their power motivation was tested. It was found that the more they were business-oriented, the higher their scores were on leadership, and lower on helping scales. In Study 3, business majors (economics, N=75) and non-business majors (psychology, N=82) completed the same questionnaire as participants in previous studies, as well as performed the IAT. Non-business majors declared stronger explicit helping motive, while business majors expressed stronger prominence and leadership motives. Furthermore, for non-business majors, IAT results could be predicted by their helping score. Implications and possible limitations of the presented results are discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

power motivation; implicit attitude; Implicit Association Test; academic major

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk
• Czasopismo: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 45
• Numer: 3
• Strony: 275-285

Daty

wydano

2014

Twórcy

autor

Norbert Maliszewski

• Wydział Psychologii UW, Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warszawa; badanie 3. finansowane ze środków BST 164635

autor

Anna O. Kuźmińska

• Wydział Zarządzania UW, ul. Szturmowa 1/3, 02-678 Warszawa;

autor

Grażyna Wieczorkowska-Wierzbińska

• Wydział Zarządzania UW, ul. Szturmowa 1/3, 02-678 Warszawa;

autor

Anna Werner-Maliszewska

• Wydział Psychologii SWPS

Bibliografia

• Baird, J., & Zelin, R. (2007). Personal Values and Ethical Viewpoints of Accounting Majors? Journal of Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Issues. 10, 39-54.
• Bauman, Y., & Rose, E. (2011). Selection or indoctrination: Why do economics students donate less than the rest? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 79(3), 318-327.
• Baumeister, R.F., & Sommer, K.L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38-44.
• Biernat, M., Crandall, C. S., Young, L. V., Kobrynowicz, D., & Halpin, S. M. (1998). All that you can be: Stereotyping of self and others in a military context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 301-317.
• Boneva B. S., Frieze, I. H., Ferligoj, A., Jarosova, E., Pauknerova, D., & Orgocka, A. (1997). East-West European migration and the role of motivation in emigration desires. Migracijske teme, 13(4), 339.
• Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A.Y. & Bargh, J.A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187.[Crossref]
• Cox, D.L., Stabb, S. D., & Hulgus, J.F. (2000). Anger suppression and depression in girls and boys: A study of gender differences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 110-112.
• Dutton, D.G., & Strachan, C.E. (1987). Motivation Leeds for Power and spouse-specific assertiveness in assaultive and non-assaultive men. Violence and Victims, 2, 145-156.
• Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognitive research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.[Crossref]
• Frank, R.H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D.T. (1993). Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), s. 159-171.[Crossref]
• Frieze, I.H., & Boneva, B.S. (2001). Power Motivation and Motivation to Help Others. [w:] A.Y. Lee-Chai, J.A. Bargh, (red.). The Use and Abuse of Power. Multiple Perspectives on the Causes of Corruption. (s. 75-87) Nowy Jork: New York University Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Utajone poznanie społeczne: postawy, wartościowanie siebie i stereotypy, Przegląd Psychologiczny, tom 38, nr 1/2, 11-63.
• Greenwald, A, McGhee D.E, & Schwarz J.L. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicite Cognition: The Implicite Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
• Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
• Howard, E. S., Gardner, W. L., & Thompson, L. (2007). The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: Self- construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 614-631.
• Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2011). Directional discrepancy between implicit and explicit power motives is related to well-being among managers. Motivation and Emotion (Special issue on Implicit Motives), 35, 317-327.
• Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P, & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593-641.
• Kuhl, J., Scheffer, D., & Eichstaedt, J. (2003). Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Ein neuer Ansatz zur Messung impliziter Motive [The operant motive-test (OMT): A new approach to the assessment of implicit motives]. In F. Rheinberg & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 129-149). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
• Jenkins, S.R. (1994). Need for Power and women’s careers over 14 years: Structured power, Job satisfaction, and motive change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 449-465.
• Maliszewski, N. (2011a). Dynamiczna teoria postaw. O relacji pomiędzy postawą jawną a utajoną.Warszawa: Wydawnictwa UW.
• Maliszewski, N. (2011b). How Do People Resolve Conflict Between Implicit and Explicit Attitudes? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 42 (1), 36-45.
• McAdams, D. P. (1982). Experiences of intimacy and power: Relationships between social motives and autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 292-302.
• McCabe, D., Butterfield, K., & Trevino, L. (2006). Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(3), 294-305.[Crossref]
• McCabe, D, Dukerich, J., & Dutton, J. (1991). Context, Values and Moral Dilemmas: Comparing the Choices of Business and Law School Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 951-60.
• McCarthy, W.C., & Frieze, I.H., (1999). Negative aspects of therapy: Client perceptions of therapists’ social influence, burnout, and quality of care. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 33-50.[Crossref]
• McClelland, D.C. (1972). What id the effect of achievement motivation in schools? Teachers College Record, 74, 129-145.
• McClelland, D.C. (1973). The two faces power. W: D.C. McClelland, R.S. Steele (red.) Human motivation. A book of readings (s. 300-316). Morristown. NJ: General Learning Press.
• McClelland, D.C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. Nowy Jork: Wiley.
• McClelland, D.C. (1987). Human motivation. Nowy Jork: Cambridge.
• McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R.,& Weinberger, J. (1989). How do selfattributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
• McConnell, A.R.,& Leibold, J.M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.[Crossref]
• Murray, H.A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Nadler, A. (2002). Inter-Group Helping Relations as Power Relations: Maintaining or Challenging Social Dominance Between Groups Through Helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 487-502.
• Nill, A., Schibrowsky, J., &Peltier, J. (2004). The Impact of Competitive Pressure on Students’ Ethical Decision-Making in a Global Setting. Marketing Education Review 14, 1-13.
• Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549-565.[Crossref]
• Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Sierz, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37-53[Crossref]
• Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). Implicit motives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Schultheiss, O.C., Wirth, M.M., Torres C.M., Pang J.S., Villacorta M.A., & Welsh K.M. (2005). Effects of Implicit Power Motivation on Men’s and Women’s Implicit Learning and Testosterone Changes After Social Victory or Defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 174-188.
• Segal, L., Gideon, L., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2011). Comparing the Ethical Attitudes of Business and Criminal Justice Students. Social Science Quarterly, 92(4), 1021-1043.
• Sheldon, K. M., King, L. A., Houser-Marko, L., Osbaldiston, R., & Gunz, A. (2007). Comparing IAT and TAT measures of power versus intimacy motivation. European Journal of Personality, 21, 236-280.
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Smith, C. T., & Nosek, B. A. (2011). Affective focus increases concordance between implicit and explicit attitudes. Social Psychology, 42, 300-313.
• Stewart, A. J., & Winter, D. G. (1976). Arousal of the power motive in women. Journalof Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 495-496.
• Tang, T. L., Chen, Y-J. Sutarso, T. (2008). Bad Apples in Bad (Business) Barrels: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, Risk Tolerance, and Unethical Behavior. Management Decision 46, 243-63.[Crossref]
• Torelli, C. J.,& Shavitt, S. (2010). Culture and Concepts of Power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 703-723.[Crossref]
• Van Dijke M, &Poppe M. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology. 36(4), 537-556.[Crossref]
• Weber, J. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (2008). Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1340 - 1353.[Crossref]
• Wieczorkowska-Wierzbińska, G. i Kuźmińska, A. (2012). Zmieniona osobowość menadżerów? W: K. Klincewicz, W. Grzywacz, (red.): Rozwój potencjału społecznego organizacji - wyzwania w XXI wieku. Warszawa: WNWZ, s. 255-269.
• Winter, D.G. (1973). The power motive. Nowy Jork: Macmillan.
• Winter, D.G. (1988). The power motive in women - and men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 510-519.[Crossref]
• Winter, D.G. (1993). The Power motive revised. W: Smith, C.P. Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. Nowy York: Cambridge University Press, 301-310.
• Winter, D.G. (1996). Personality: Analysis and interpretation of lives. Nowy Jork: McGraw Hill.
• Zurbriggen, E.L. (2000). Social Motives and Cognitive Power-Sex Associations: Predictors of Aggressive Sexual Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 559-581. [Crossref]

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ppb-2014-0034

Biblioteka Nauki

430860