The impact of the maritime border on the development of Poland’s border areas in terms of expenses of foreigners and the COVID-19 pandemic

• Autorzy: Agnieszka Malkowska , Arkadiusz Malkowski , Anna Tokarz-Kocik

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this paper is to present the issue of border traffic of foreigners and their expenses on the Polish maritime border. The study is based on quantitative data on border traffic and expenses of foreigners in Poland. The time of the study was 2014–2021. Thus, the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on foreigners’ mobility and spending in Poland was additionally taken into account. For the purpose of this paper, the following study methods were adopted: reference literature analysis, secondary data analysis and comparative analysis. The paper mainly uses data from official statistics and the Border Guard. The study has shown that the Polish maritime border generates the smallest volume of border traffic, however, its share increased during the analysed period from 0.7% in 2014 to 0.8% in 2021. Nevertheless, it is foreigners crossing the maritime border who on average spend in Poland more than twice as much as foreigners crossing the Polish land border. In 2020, they spent the most on non-food goods (40%) and services (34.7%). As the study results reveal, their spending patterns and travel purposes are different from those of foreigners crossing the land border. The potential that foreign visitors bring is significant for the development of border areas in such sectors as tourism, services and trade. The analysis of the motivation of foreigners crossing the sea border makes it possible to shape the regional development policy of this particular area.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maritime border; expenses of foreigners; shopping tourism; border area development; maritime border areas; South Baltic Area

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Czasopismo: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 42
• Numer: 4
• Strony: 157-168

Daty

wydano

2023

Twórcy

autor

Agnieszka Malkowska

• University of Szczecin

autor

Arkadiusz Malkowski

• West Pomeranian University of Technology

autor

Anna Tokarz-Kocik

• University of Szczecin

Bibliografia

• Alegre J., Cladera M., 2012. Tourist characteristics that influence shopping participation and expenditures. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research 6: 223-237.
• Anderson J., Wever E., 2003. Borders, border regions and economic integration: One world, ready or not. Journal of Borderlands studies 18(1): 27-38.
• Bar-Kołelis D., Wendt J.A., 2018. Comparison of cross-border shopping tourism activities at the Polish and Romanian external borders of European Union. Geographia Polonica 91(1): 113-125.
• Batyk I.M., 2016. Small border traffic between Poland and the Kaliningrad Oblast of the Russian Federation as one of the elements creating cross-border cooperation. European Journal of Service Management 19(3): 5-10.
• Bobryk A., 2020. Security policy and regional development: The impact of local border traffic on the economy of the Polish-Russian border area. Regional Science Policy & Practice 12(5): 833-845.
• Brunet-Jailly E., 2012. In the increasingly global economy, are borderland regions public management instruments? International Journal of Public Sector Management 25(6-7): 483-491.
• Bygvra S., 2020. Cross-border shopping – A regional economic perspective. Online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susanne-Bygvra/publication/346059959_Cross-border_shopping_A_regional_economic_perspective/links/5fb94dbe458515b7975d54cb/Cross-border-shopping-A-regional-economic-perspective.pdf (accessed 30 April 2022).
• Canale D., 2020. Border walls: On the contemporary transformation of state borders. Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper 3536293.
• Cerić D., 2019. Transgraniczna przestrzeń turystyczna obszarów morskich i nadmorskich na przykładzie Morza Bałtyckiego – próba wyjaśnienia pojęcia (Cross-border tourism space in maritime and seaside areas as exemplified by the Baltic Sea Region – an attempt at explaining the concept). Przegląd Geograficzny 91(4): 531-551.
• Cerić D., Więckowski M., 2020. Establishing transboundary tourist space in the Baltic Sea region. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity 12(5): 149-157.
• Choi M.J., Heo C.Y., Law R., 2016. Progress in shopping tourism. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 33(1): 1-24.
• Choi M.J., Law R., Heo C.Y., 2018. An investigation of the perceived value of shopping tourism. Journal of Travel Research 57(7): 962-980.
• CLIA Europe, 2013. The cruise industry. Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Economies of Europe: 3-29.
• CLIA Europe, 2018. The cruise industry. Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Economies of Europe 2017: 4-28.
• Cooper A., Perkins C., 2012. Borders and status-functions: An institutional approach to the study of borders. European Journal of Social Theory 15(1): 55-71.
• Copus A.K., 2001. From core-periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies 9(4): 539-552.
• Cyargeenka A., 2021. Changes in cross-border tourist traffic on the Poland-Belarus border, as exemplified by the Augustów Canal. Turyzm 31(1): 57-68.
• Díaz-Sauceda J., Palau-Saumell R., Forgas-Coll S., Sánchez-García J., 2015. Cross-border tourists’ behavioral intentions: The green line of Nicosia, Cyprus. Tourism Geographies 17(5): 758-779.
• Dołzbłasz S., Zelek K., 2019. Wybrane cechy zagospodarowania przestrzennego i aktywności gospodarczej w otoczeniu miejsc przekraczania granicy polsko-niemieckiej (Selected features of spatial management and economic activity in the vicinity of border-crossing points on the Polish-German border). Przegląd Geograficzny 91(4): 487-510.
• Dooms M., Haezendonck E., Vrbeke A., 2015. Towards a meta-analysis and toolkit for port-related socio-economic impacts: A review of socio-economic impact studies conducted for seaports. Maritime Policy & Management 42(5-6): 459-473.
• Eckardt M., Kappner K., Wolf N., 2020. COVID-19 across European regions: The role of border controls. DP15178. Online: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=15178 (accessed 10 May 2022).
• Ennew C., 2003. Understanding the economic impact of tourism. World 477: 463-466.
• Erkut G., Özgen C., 2003. The economic and spatial peripherality of border regions in Southeastern Europe. In: 43rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Peripheries, Centres, and Spatial Development in the New Europe”. 27th – 30th August 2003, Jyväskylä, Finland: 1-29.
• Getz D., Kelly M., Joncas D., 1994. Tourist shopping villages in the Calgary region. Journal of Tourism Studies 5(1): 2-15.
• Ianioglo A., Rissanen M., 2020. Global trends and tourism development in peripheral areas. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 20(5): 520-539.
• Ivan G., Tatyana K., Lidiya O., 2016. Local border traffic as an efficient tool for developing cross-border cooperation. Baltic Region 8(1): 67-82.
• Johnson C.M., 2009. Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in Central Europe: Room for more transboundary space. European Urban and Regional Studies 16(2): 177-191.
• Jussi J., 2000. Regional development and regional policy. European Union and the Baltic Sea region. University of Turku, Turku.
• Kizielewicz J., 2016. Cruise travels to the Arctic and Antarctica-trends, development & prospects. Ekonomiczne Problemy Turystyki 3: 313-325.
• Kizielewicz J., 2020. Measuring the economic and social contribution of cruise tourism development to coastal tourist destinations. European Research Studies Journal 23(3): 147-171.
• Kolosov V., Więckowski M., 2018. Border changes in Central and Eastern Europe: An introduction. Geographia Polonica 91(1): 5-16.
• Kropinova E., 2021. Transnational and cross-border cooperation for sustainable tourism development in the Baltic Sea region. Sustainability 13(4): 2111.
• Leick B., Schewe T., Kivedal B.K., 2021. Tourism development and border asymmetries: An exploratory analysis of market-driven cross-border shopping tourism. Tourism Planning & Development 18(6): 673-698.
• Liberato D., Liberato P., Silva M., 2020. Shopping tourism: Comparative analysis of the cities of Oporto and Lisbon as shopping destinations. In: Katsoni V., Spyriadis T. (eds), Cultural and tourism innovation in the digital era. Springer, Cham: 365-379.
• Lim D.S., Kim J.B., 2022. The long-term development of a smart region at the border of the Amnok River. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 38(5): 131-138.
• Lundén T., 2018. Border regions and cross-border cooperation in Europe. A theoretical and historical approach. In: Medeiros E. (ed.), European territorial cooperation. Springer, Cham: 97-113.
• Malkowski A., 2019. Shopping tourism as a factor in the development of peripheral areas on the example of the Polish-Ukrainian borderland. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management 139: 301-312.
• Malkowski A., Mickiewicz B., Malkowska A., 2020. Shopping tourism as a factor in the development of peripheral areas: The case of the Polish-German borderland. European Research Studies Journal 23(3): 238-248.
• Martinsen D.S., Rotger G., Thierry J.S., 2019. Free movement of people and cross-border welfare in the European Union: Dynamic rules, limited outcomes. Journal of European Social Policy 29(1): 84-99.
• Mikhaylova A.A., Wendt J.A., Hvaley D.V., Bógdał-Brzezińska A., Mikhaylov A.S., 2022. Impact of cross-border tourism on the sustainable development of rural areas in the Russian-Polish and Russian-Kazakh borderlands. Sustainability 14(4): 2409-2438.
• Palmowski T., Fedorov G.M., 2020. The potential for development of Russian-Polish cross-border region. Geography, Environment, Sustainability 13(1): 21-28.
• Pezzi M.G., Urso G., 2016. Peripheral areas: Conceptualizations and policies. Introduction and editorial note. Italian Journal of Planning Practice 6(1): 1-19.
• Ramazannejad Y., Zarghamfard M., Hajisharifi A., Azar S., 2021. Factors behind tourists’ travel motivation: The case of the Gilan Region, Iran. Quaestiones Geographicae 40(4): 101-112.
• Renfors S.M., Lanzanova A., Czarnecka-Gallas M., 2021. Baltic Sea marinas as sustainable tourism destinations. Satakunta University of Applied Sciences, Satakunta. Online: https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/494498/2021_B6_Baltic_Blue_Marinas_as_Sustainable_Tourism_Destinations.pdf.pdf?sequence=4 (accessed 10 June 2022).
• Roest M., 2004. Report tourism development in the Baltic Sea region. Creating joint policies as a win-win scenario. Online: http://www.bdforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/thematic_reports_tourism_2004.pdf (accessed 10 June 2022).
• Rogerson C.M., 2011. Urban tourism and regional tourists: Shopping in Johannesburg, South Africa. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 102(3): 316-330.
• Rylance A., Spenceley A., 2017. Reducing economic leakages from tourism: A value chain assessment of the tourism industry in Kasane, Botswana. Development Southern Africa 34(3): 295-313.
• Salvatore R., Chiodo E., Fantini A., 2018. Tourism transition in peripheral rural areas: Theories, issues and strategies. Annals of Tourism Research 68: 41-51.
• Schimmelfennig F., 2021. Rebordering Europe: External boundaries and integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 28(3): 311-330.
• Scott J.W., 2015. Bordering, border politics and cross-border cooperation in Europe. In: Celata F., Coletti R. (eds), Neighbourhood policy and the construction of the European external borders. Cham: Springer International Publishing (GeoJournal Library): 27-44.
• Spierings B., Van Der Velde M., 2008. Shopping, borders and unfamiliarity: Consumer mobility in Europe. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 99(4): 497-505.
• Statistics Poland, 2015. Border traffic and expenses made by foreigners in Poland and Poles abroad in 2014. GUS, Warsaw.
• Statistics Poland, 2022. Border traffic and expenses made by foreigners in Poland and Poles abroad in 2021. GUS, Warsaw.
• Studzieniecki S.T., Jakubowski J.A., Meyer M.B., 2020. Transnational tourist destination management: A case study of the Baltic sea region. Baltic Region 12(3): 127-146.
• Studzieniecki T., Jakubowski A., Meyer B., 2021. Key conditions for Euro regions development at external EU borders: A case study of the Polish-Belarusian borderland. Regional Science Policy & Practice 14(4): 718-739.
• Studzieniecki T., Palmowski T., Korneevets V., 2016. The system of cross-border tourism in the Polish-Russian borderland. Procedia Economics and Finance 39: 545-552.
• Timothy D.J., 2017. Shopping tourism. Special interest tourism: Concepts, contexts and cases. In: Agarwal S., Busby G., Huang R. (eds), Shopping tourism. CAP International, Walllingford: 134-144.
• UNWTO, 2014. Global report on shopping tourism. World Tourism Organisation 8. Online: https://webunwto.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/imported_images/42481/am9-shopping-report_v2.pdf (accessed 10 May 2022).
• Więckowski M., 2011. Wybrane aspekty rozwoju turystyki transgranicznej w sąsiedztwie zewnętrznej granicy strefy Schengen (Selected aspects of trans-border tourism development in the vicinity of the external border of the Schengen area). Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Społeczno-Przyrodniczej w Lublinie 12: 122-140.
• Więckowski M., Cerić D., 2016. Evolving tourism on the Baltic Sea coast: Perspectives on change in the Polish maritime borderland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 16: 98-111.
• Więckowski M., Timothy D.J., 2021. Tourism and an evolving international boundary: Bordering, debordering and rebordering on Usedom Island, Poland-Germany. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 22: 100647.
• Wong Villanueva J.L., Kidokoro T., Seta F., 2020. Cross-border integration, cooperation and governance: A systems approach for evaluating “good” governance in cross-border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies 1-24.
• Zaitseva N.A., Korneevets V.S., Kropinova E.G., Kuznetsova T.Y., Semenova L.V., 2016. Cross-border movement of people between Russia and Poland and their influence on the economy of border regions. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6(4): 1690-1695.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14746/quageo-2023-0038

Biblioteka Nauki

52570796