Public space in different cultural conditions: The cases of Glasgow and Poznań

• Autorzy: Wojciech Ewertowski

Abstrakty

EN

Public spaces are among the most important components of the contemporary city. They are supposed to be places of vibrant social life, where a broad set of activities and behaviours can be observed. However, the role of public spaces as well as their spatial features can differ in various societies. The built environment, as a human creation, is affected by many social factors and one of them is culture. Thus, cultural conditions can have an impact on how urban space is created, perceived, and used. Those differences are most clearly visible in distant cultures, but they may occur to a greater or lesser extent within a single culture circle. Public spaces, because of their accessibility, egalitarianism, and wide range of users are especially useful as an area of research on the relationship between space and culture. This paper presents differences between Glasgow (United Kingdom) and Poznań (Poland) in the perception and attitude towards urban public space concerning cultural conditions. The theoretical background of the relations between space and culture, and the contemporary views of public space are discussed. Afterwards, the results of the survey study conducted in both cities are presented. The research results are discussed in the context of cultural differences derived from the cultural models and show that cultural dimensions can be used to explain the activity of users of urban public spaces. They also indicate that the variety in behaviour patterns and approaches to public space can be observed within the European cultural circle.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

public space; cultural differences; spatial behaviour; cross-culture research; culture; Glasgow; Poznań

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Czasopismo: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 42
• Numer: 2
• Strony: 115-129

Daty

wydano

2023

Twórcy

autor

Wojciech Ewertowski

• Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Bibliografia

• Abaza M., 2001. Shopping malls, consumer culture and the reshaping of public space in Egypt. Theory, Culture & Society 18: 97–122.
• Auge M., 1995. Non-places: An introduction to super modernity. Verso Books, London.
• Baumann Z., 2003. Razem, osobno (Together, apart). Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków.
• Cao J., Kang J., 2019. Social relationships and patterns of use in urban public spaces in China and the United Kingdom. Cities 93: 188–196.
• Carr S., Francis M., Rivlin L., Stone A., 1992. Public space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Cegłowska A., Matykowski R., 2010. Przestrzenie publiczne i ich znaczenie w dużym mieście: przypadek Poznania (Public spaces and their significance in a big city: The case of Poznań). Studia miejskie 2: 243–256.
• Davies A., 2006. Football and sectarianism in Glasgow during the 1920s and 1930s. Irish Historical Studies 35(138): 200–219.
• Dejbakhsh S., Arrowsmith C., Jackson M., 2011. Cultural influence on spatial behaviour. Tourism Geographies 13(1): 91–111.
• Drozdowski R., Fatyga B., Filiciak M., Krajewski M., Szlendak T., 2014. Praktyki kulturalne Polaków (Poles’ cultural practices). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
• Gardiner M., 2005. Modern Scottish Culture. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
• Geenens R., Tinnevelt R. (eds), 2009. Does truth matter? Democracy and public space. Springer, Dordrecht.
• Gehl J., 2009. Życie między budynkami: użytkowanie przestrzeni publicznych (Life between buildings: Using public space). Wydawnictwo RAM, Kraków.
• Gehl J., Svarre B., 2013. How to study public life. Island Press, Washington.
• Glasgow City Development Plan, 2016. Online: https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=36886&p=0 (accessed 24 February 2023).
• Goffman E., 1963. Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. The Free Press, New York.
• Hall E., 1959. The silent language. Fawcett, Greenwich.
• Hall E., 1966 The hidden dimension. Doubleday, New York.
• Hall E., 1976. Beyond culture. Doubleday, New York.
• Hillier B., 2005. The art of place and the science of space. World Architecture 11(185): 96–102.
• Hofstede G., 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Hopkins P. (ed.), 2017. Scotland’s Muslims: Society, politics and identity. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
• House R., Javidan M., Dorfman P. 2001. Project GLOBE: An introduction. Applied Psychology 50(4): 489–505.
• Inroy N., 2007. Urban regeneration and public space: The story of an urban park. Space and Polity 4(1): 23–40.
• Jacobs J., 1961. The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books, New York.
• Jałowiecki B., 2010. Społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni (Social creation of space). Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warsaw.
• Jałowiecki B., Szczepański M., 2006. Miasto i przestrzeń w perspektywie socjologicznej (City and space in sociological perspective). Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warsaw.
• Januchta-Szostak A., 2018. Methodology of visual art localization in public spaces on example of Poznan city. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 31(1): 29–38.
• Kearns A., McKee M., Sautkina E., Cox J., Bond L., 2013. How to mix? Spatial configurations, modes of production and resident perceptions of mixed tenure neighbourhoods. Cities 35: 397–408.
• Kotus J., 2006. Changes in the spatial structure of a large Polish city – The case of Poznań. Cities 23(5): 364–381.
• Kotus J., Rzeszewski M., 2013. Between disorder and livability. Case of one street in post-socialist city. Cities 32: 123–134.
• Langstraat F., van Melik R., 2013. Challenging the ‘end of public space’: A comparative analysis of publicness in British and Dutch urban spaces. Journal of Urban Design: 37–41.
• Lefebvre H., 1991. The production of space. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
• Lewicka M., 2012. Psychologia miejsca (Psychology of place). Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warsaw.
• Lofland L., 1998. The public realm: Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
• Low S., Smith N. (eds), 2006. The politics of public space. Routledge, New York.
• Lynch K, 1960. Image of the city. The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.
• Madanipour A., 2003. Public and private spaces in the city. Routledge, London.
• Matsumoto D., Juang L., 2007. Psychologia międzykulturowa (Culture and psychology: People around the world). Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
• Mehta V., 2014. Evaluating public space. Journal of Urban Design 19(1): 53–88.
• Mumford L., 1961. The city in history. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, INC, New York.
• Nawratek K., 2012. Dziury w całym. Wstęp do miejskich rewolucji (Holes in the whole: Introduction to the urban revolutions). Krytyka Polityczna. Warsaw.
• Nisbett R., 2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently... and why. Free Press, New York.
• Nisbett R., Masuda T., 2003. Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(19): 11163–11170.
• Nisbett R., Miyamoto Y., 2005. The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Studies 9(10): 467–473.
• Parkinson J., 2009. Does democracy require physical public space? In: Geenens R., Tinnevelt R. (eds), Does truth matter? Democracy and public space. Springer, Dordrecht: 101–114.
• Parysek J., Mierzejewska L., 2006. City profile: Poznań. Cities 23(4): 291–305.
• PEW Research Center, 2018. Eastern and Western Europeans differ on importance of religion, views on minorities and key social issues. Online: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/Pew-Research-Center_Global-Views-of-Cultural-Change_2019-04-22.pdf (accessed 5 March 2023).
• Pollock V., Paddison R., 2014. On place-making, participation and public art: The Gorbals, Glasgow. Journal of Urbanism 7(1): 85–105.
• Rapoport A., 1969. House form and society. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
• Rapoport A., 1980. Cross-cultural aspects of environmental design. In: Altman I., Rapoport A., Wohlwill J. (eds), Human behaviour and environment. Springer Science+Business Media, New York: 7–46.
• Schwartz S., 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology 25: 1–65.
• Schwartz S., Sagiv L., 1995. Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of cross-cultural psychology 26(92): 92–116.
• Sępioł J. (ed.), 2014. Przestrzeń życia Polaków (Living space of Poles). Wydawnictwo Murator, Warsaw.
• Sharp J., 2007., The life and death of five spaces: Public art and community regeneration in Glasgow. Cultural Geographies 14(2): 274–292.
• Sorkin M., 1992. Introduction: Variations on a theme park. In: Sorkin M. (ed.), Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of the public space. Hill and Wang.
• Stanley B., Stark B., Johnston K., Smith M., 2012. Urban open spaces in historical perspective: A transdisciplinary typology and analysis. Urban Geography 33(8): 1089–1117.
• Trompenaars F., Hampden-Turner C., 1997. Riding the waves of culture. Understanding cultural diversity in business. Nicolas Brealey Publishing, London.
• Tuan Y., 1974. Tophophilia. A study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
• Tucker M., 2008. The cultural production of cities: Rhetoric or reality? Lessons from Glasgow. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property 7(1): 21–33.
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2019. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. New York.
• Whyte W., 1980. The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces, New York.
• Zieleniec A., 2002. Park spaces: Leisure, culture and modernity – a Glasgow case study. PhD thesis. Online: https://theses.gla.ac.uk/3421/ (accessed 24 February 2023).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14746/quageo-2023-0019

Biblioteka Nauki

52496494