University Leadership, Abyssal Responsibility, Sovereign Exception: An Argument for a New Form of Disciplinary Decision-Making

• Autorzy: Dronsfield Jonathan
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A critique of university leadership, in particular as it is manifest in disciplinary processes. The basic problem is the separation of the leader from the institution she leads. Separation is an all-too-common problem with university leadership, and gives rise to a fundamental crisis of responsibility – what I name the problem of abyssal responsibility: a non-locatable responsibility for which no-one answers fully – making it unfairly difficult for the academic sanctioned to challenge the disciplinary decision. The gap created by the separation of the person deciding from evidence and reasons can be exploited for abusing power. In abyssal responsibility, the right to punish is intimately linked to the right to grant clemency, what I call sovereign exception. I ask whether the separation internal to the structure of abyssal responsibility might allow for a creative corrective to it. And I answer no, because then the only responsible decision would to abolish the leader. Responsibility in such cases must be made transparent and visible. I propose a form of leadership which is non-personalist and de-hierarchised, one which involves co-learning and co-responsivity, and above all is not separate. In short, a leadership which is democratic.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

universities; vice-chancellors; crisis; responsibility; sovereign exception; autocracy; abuse of power; transparency; visibility

• Wydawca: Instytut Socjologii UW
• Czasopismo: Stan Rzeczy
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: 1(24) New Sociology of Leadership
• Strony: 271-288

Twórcy

autor

Dronsfield Jonathan

Bibliografia

• Derrida J. 2000. Of Hospitality: Anne Dufourmantelle Invites Jacques Derrida to Respond, trans. R. Bowlby, Stanford University Press.
• Docherty T. 2011. For the University: Democracy and the Future of the Institution, Bloomsbury.
• Foucault M. (1975) 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. A. Sheridan, Vintage Books.
• Green J.E. 2010. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in the Age of Spectatorship, Oxford University Press.
• Han B.-C. 2015. The Transparency Society, trans. E. Butler, Stanford University Press.
• Heidegger M. (1957) 1991. The Principle of Reason, trans. R. Lilly, Indiana University Press.
• Hewart G. 1924. “Rex v Sussex Justices,” ex parte McCarthy, 1 KB 256. England and Wales High Court (King’s Bench Division) Decisions, https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1923/1.html, accessed: 10.07.2024.
• Kant I. (1797) 1991. “The Doctrine of Right,” [in:] The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor, Cambridge University Press.
• Locke J. (1689) 1986. The Second Treatise of Government, ed. T. Peardon, Macmillan.
• Raelin J.A., ed. 2016. Leadership-as-Practice: Theory and Application, Routledge.
• Raelin J.A. 2022. “Update of Leadership-as-Practice ‘Practice Theory’: Joe Raelin Interviewed by Jenny Robinson,” Leadership, vol. 18(5), pp. 695–706, https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150221100594.
• Sennett R. 2003. Respect in a World of Inequality, W.W. Norton & Company.
• Spoelstra S. 2020. “The Truths and Falsehoods of Post-Truth Leaders,” Leadership, vol. 16(6), pp. 757–764, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020937886.
• Weber M. 1968. On Charisma and Institution Building: Selected Papers, ed. S.N. Eisenstadt, The University of Chicago Press.
• Weber M. 2008. Complete Writings on Academic and Political Vocations, trans. G.C. Wells, ed. J. Dreijmanis, Algora Publishing.
• Žižek S. 2003. The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.