Moving Towards Better Digital Accessibility - Current Status and Challenges

• Autorzy: Marzena Wójcik-Augustyniak , Marek Szajczyk , Mariusz Cielemęcki , Stanisław Szarek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: This article aims to identify the current challenges faced by various stakeholder groups in increasing digital accessibility in EU countries. Design/methodology/approach: The main assumption of this article is that in order to enhance the level of digital accessibility, it is necessary to take not only legal actions but also engage in social and training initiatives. The basic research problem is: What challenges related to acquiring new competencies are currently being faced by stakeholders involved in ensuring website accessibility. The research was based on quantitative data collection methods. Findings: The results of quantitative research based on 432 surveys collected among project stakeholders in four countries: Slovenia (N = 173), Poland (N = 135) Greece (N = 89) and Spain (N = 35) shows that IT/Web development professionals, young adults, and those with higher education are more knowledgeable about accessibility standards and regulations. Preferences for additional training on web accessibility varied, with uniform importance placed on international certification. Training plans were positively correlated with occupation, particularly among IT professionals, but showed no correlation with age, country, education level, or employment status. Research limitations/implications: Implications resulting from the conducted research include both social and practical aspects. Socially, the findings highlight the need to engage non-IT professionals and older individuals in digital accessibility training to ensure broader inclusion. Practically, the research points to the necessity of developing comprehensive training programs and certification standards, as well as streamlining recognition systems for digital accessibility qualifications, to enhance overall digital competency and inclusion. Originality/value: The value and originality of this article lie in its dual focus on the legal and social dimensions of digital accessibility, particularly within the European Union. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the current challenges faced by stakeholders in ensuring website accessibility, emphasizing the necessity of both regulatory measures and practical training initiatives. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Digitalizacja; Umiejętności cyfrowe; Komunikowanie cyfrowe

EN

Digitizing; Digital competences; Digital Communication

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Numer: z. 198 Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary Management
• Strony: 655-678

Twórcy

autor

Marzena Wójcik-Augustyniak

• University of Siedlce

autor

Marek Szajczyk

• University of Siedlce

autor

Mariusz Cielemęcki

• University of Siedlce

autor

Stanisław Szarek

• University of Siedlce

Bibliografia

• 1. 1ka Online Survey (2019). Retrieved from: https://www.1ka.si/d/en, December 14, 2022.
• 2. Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., Guitton, M. (2020, October). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, p. 106424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424
• 3. Costi Santarosa, L., Conforto, D. (2016, July). Educational and digital inclusion for subjects with autism spectrum disorders in 1:1 technological configuration. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp. 293-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.021
• 4. Digital Accessibility (2019, February 28). IO1 - A1 Desktop research: The analysis of digital accessibility. Retrieved from: Digital Accessibility: https://digital-accessibility.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/DA_IO1_A1-Desktop-reseach-report-FINAL_Acessible.pdf, November 17, 2023.
• 5. Digital Accessibility (2019, February 28). IO1 - A2 Digital Accessibility Survey for stakeholders. Retrieved from: Digital Accessibility: https://digital-accessibility.eu/ wp-content/uploads/2020/11/DA_IO1_A2Survey-report_FINAL_Accessible.pdf, November 15, 2022.
• 6. European Commission (2015, December 2). Commission proposes to make products and services more accessible to the disabled persons. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_15_6147, July 12, 2023.
• 7. European Commission (2020, March 3). Communication From The Commission Europe 2020, A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved from: EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:en:PDF, December 20, 2022.
• 8. European Commission (2023, July 10). Individuals using the internet for interaction with public authorities. Retrieved from: data.europa.eu - The official portal for European data: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/mxkqqdbovbfreyxg3xwa?locale=en, August 15, 2023.
• 9. European Commission (2023). Job results. Retrieved from: EURES: https://ec.europa.eu/eures/portal/jv-se/search?page=1&resultsPerPage=10&orderBy= BEST_MATCH&keywordsEverywhere=accessibility§or=j&lang=en July, 12, 2023.
• 10. European Commission (2023). Persons with disabilities. Retrieved from: Social protection & social inclusion: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1137&langId=en, August 10, 2023.
• 11. European Union (2016, October 26). DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/2102 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 October 2016 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies. Retrieved from: EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/2102/oj, December 17, 2022.
• 12. European Union (2019, December 11). Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the european council, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. The European Green Deal. Retrieved from: EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640, December 16, 2022.
• 13. European Union (2019, April 17). Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (Text with EEA relevance). Retrieved from: EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L0882, September 20, 2023.
• 14. European Union (2022, December 7). COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EVALUATION Review of the application of Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies (WAD). Retrieved from: EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=SWD:2022:410:FIN, August 17, 2023.
• 15. European Union (2023, January 27). Web Accessibility Directive Review. Retrieved from: European Union of the Deaf: https://www.eud.eu/web-accessibility-directive-review%EF%BF%BC/, June 25, 2023.
• 16. Eurostat (2023, August 1). How many EU people can afford an internet connection? Retrieved from: Eurostat: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/edn-20230801-1, August 15, 2023.
• 17. Fung, K.-K., Hung, S.S.-L., Lai, D.W., Shum, M.H., Fung, H.-W., He, L. (2023, June 23). Access to Information and Communication Technology, Digital Skills, and Perceived Well-Being among Older Adults in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), p. 6208. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136208
• 18. Gay, G. (2023, February 23). Open curriculum for teaching digital accessibility. Frontiers in Computer Science, p. 1113936. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113936
• 19. Hill, R., Betts, L., Gardner, S. (2015, July). Older adults' experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, pp. 415-423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.062
• 20. Inal, Y., Guribye, F., Rajanen, D., Rajanen, M., Rost, M. (2020). Perspectives and Practices of Digital Accessibility: A Survey of User Experience Professionals in Nordic Countries. In: D. Lamas, H. Sarapuu (Eds.), NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (pp. 1-11). Tallin, Estonia: Association for Computing Machinery. New York, United States. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420119
• 21. Integracja.org (2023). Integracja. Retrieved from: Integracja: https://www.integracja.org/, August 12, 2023.
• 22. ISAP (2019, April 4). Polish Act of 4 April 2019 on the digital accessibility of websites and mobile applications of public entities. Retrieved from: ISAP: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20190000848, June 7, 2023.
• 23. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K. (2019, April 1). Web accessibility investigation and identification of major issues of higher education websites with statistical measures: A case study of college websites. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34, pp. 901-911. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.03.011
• 24. ITU (2022, October). Digital inclusion of all. Retrieved from: ITU Committed to connecting the world, https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/backgrounders/Pages/digital-inclusion-of-all.aspx, May 5, 2023.
• 25. Kärnä, E., Aavikko, L., Rohner, R., Gallistl, V., Pihlainen, K., Müller, C. et al. (2022, November 25). A Multilevel Model of Older Adults' Appropriation of ICT and Acquisition of Digital Literacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), p. 15714. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315714
• 26. Kulkarni, M. (2019, April 24). Digital accessibility: Challenges and opportunities. IIMB Management Review, pp. 91-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.05.009
• 27. Lin, Z., Yang, L., Zhi'an, Z. (2018). To include, or not to include, that is the question: Disability digital inclusion and exclusion in China. New Media & Society, 20(12), pp. 4436-4452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818774866
• 28. Logitech Adaptive Esports Tournaments (2023). Logitech Adaptive Esports Tournaments. Retrieved from: Logitech Adaptive Esports Tournaments: https://aet.gg/, August 12, 2023.
• 29. Martínez-Alcalá, C., Alejandra, R.-L., de los Ángeles Alonso-Lavernia, M., Ramírez-Salvador, J., Jiménez-Rodríguez, B., Cepeda-Rebollar, R., Agis-Juárez, R. (2018, August 28). Digital Inclusion in Older Adults: A Comparison Between Face-to-Face and Blended Digital Literacy Workshops. Frontiers in ICT, 5, pp. 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00021
• 30. Media Access Australia (2014, March 12). European Union Legislates For Web Accessibility. Retrieved from: Media Access Australia: https://mediaaccess.org.au/ latest_news/general-online-media-policy-legislation-international-policy-and-legislation-news/european-union-legislates-for-web, December 18, 2021.
• 31. Morte-Nadal, T., Esteban-Navarro, M. (2022, January_December 18). Digital Competences for Improving Digital Inclusion in E-Government Services: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review Protocol. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211070935
• 32. mozilla. (2023). What is accessibility? Retrieved from: developer mozilla: https://developer.mozilla.org/pl/docs/Learn/Accessibility/What_is_accessibility, June 17, 2023.
• 33. Nguyen, M., Hargittai, E., Marler, W. (2021, July). Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: The case of COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, p. 106717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717
• 34. Notley, T., Aziz, A. (2024). The unjust burden of digital inclusion for low-income migrant parents. Policy & Internet, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.383
• 35. NIK (2018, October 30). Dostępność przestrzeni publicznej dla osób starszych i niepełnosprawnych. Retrieved from: Najwyższa Izba Kontroli: https://www.nik.gov.pl/ kontrole/P/17/094/LKA/, May (1)7, 2022.
• 36. OECD (2021). Bridging digital divides in G20 countries. OECD. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/35c1d850-en
• 37. OECD (2022). Access to computers from home. doi:10.1787/a70b8a9f-en
• 38. Oncins, E., Armony, A., Fitzpatrick, D. (2020). Mapping The European Digital Accessibility Field: The IMPACT Project. 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (pp. 33-37). Portugal: Association for Computing Machinery. New York, United States. doi: 10.1145/3439231.3440608
• 39. Pérez-Escolar, M., Canet, F. (2023, August). Research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion: toward a consolidated taxonomical framework. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22, pp. 1059-1072. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00867-x
• 40. Polish Language Dictionary (2021). Słownik języka polskiego (sjp). Retrieved from: dostępny: https://sjp.pl/dostępny, June 3, 2021.
• 41. Rankin, J. (2005, January). Mental Health and Social Inclusion. Retrieved from: Mental Health in the Mainstream: https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/ 2011/05/mental_health_paper2_1342.pdf, August 25, 2023.
• 42. Spandler, H. (2007, November 01). From Social Exclusion to Inclusion? A Critique of the Inclusion Imperative in Mental Health. Medical Sociology online, 2(2), pp. 3-16. Retrieved from: From Social Exclusion to Inclusion? A Critique of the Inclusion Imperative in Mental Health: https://britsoc.co.uk/files/MSo-Volume-2-Issue-2.pdf

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.198.37