Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Objective: The objective of the article is to assess the competitiveness of Polish service exports to the EU by EBOPS categories and its changes in 2010-2022 and to compare the structure of Poland's competitive advantages in the exchange of services with the main EU trade partners (Germany, France, and the Netherlands). Research Design & Methods: Research methods include a critical analysis of the subject literature and a ratio analysis of export competitiveness using the RSCA and TBI indices. On their basis, we developed a matrix to allow for a synthetic assessment of the competitiveness of Polish services exports and the mapping of service branches in the markets of selected EU member states. The analysis also considered a third indicator, i.e., the export share index. Findings: The most competitive branches of Polish service exports include mainly traditional branches (i.e., goods-related and manufacturing services, transport, travel and construction services) as well as telecommunications and IT services and personal, cultural, and recreational services. During the period under study, the composition of competitive advantages of Polish exports of services to the EU did not change significantly. The only branches of Polish service exports whose competitive advantages increased in the period under study were transport, construction, telecommunications, computer, information, and personal, cultural, and recreational services. Based on traditional service industries, the pattern of competitive advantages in Polish service exports was characterised by relatively little differentiation across the main EU export markets. In exporting traditional branches of services, the greatest advantage occurs in the German market and in exporting other service industries in the Dutch market. Implications & Recommendations: The obtained research results can be a starting point for verifying the industry structure and partly also the geographical structure of Polish service exports to the EU. On their basis, it is possible to indicate the categories of services with the best prospects for the development of exports to the EU market and the surveyed member states. Contribution & Value Added: Relatively few studies of Polish service exports concerned their competitiveness in the EU market, most of them analysed the total value of exports. Furthermore, among studies assessing competitiveness in the EU market, researchers' attention generally focused on specific service categories and the EU market was treated as a homogeneous whole. Therefore, the issue of diversification of the competitive position of Polish service exports on the markets of individual EU member states was not taken into account. This article is an attempt to fill this research gap. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
143-158
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Krakow University of Economics
Bibliografia
- 1. Ambroziak, A.A. (2018). Manufacturing vs services: changes in intra-EU trade. The case of the Visegrád Countries. In M. Staníčková, L. Melecký, E. Kovářová & K. Dvoroková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration 2018 (pp. 59-66). VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava.
- 2. Ambroziak, A.A., & Stefaniak, J. (2022). The position of China in trade in services within the European Union. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.010
- 3. Ambroziak, Ł. (2013). Konkurencyjność eksportu rolno-spożywczego Polski i wybranych nowych państw członkowskich na rynku UE-15. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu, 15(3), 21-26. Retrieved from http://bazekon.icm.edu.pl/bazekon/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171338599 on July 4, 2024.
- 4. Ambroziak, Ł. (2016). Konkurencyjność cenowo-jakościowa polskich producentów żywności na rynku niemieckim. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 16(31), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.22630/PRS.2016.16.1.1
- 5. Antimiani, A., & Cernat, L. (2018). Liberalizing Global Trade in Mode 5 Services: How Much Is It Worth?. Journal of World Trade, 52(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2018004
- 6. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33. 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
- 7. Baldwin, R., Freeman, R., & Theodorakopoulos, A. (2024). Deconstructing deglobalization: The future of trade is in intermediate services. Asian Economic Policy Review, 19(1), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12440
- 8. Blázquez, L., Díaz-Mora, C., & González-Díaz, B. (2023). Hubs of embodied business services in a GVC world. International Economics, 174(C), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2023.02.004
- 9. Bombińska, E. (2021). Modele świadczenia usług w handlu międzynarodowym. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
- 10. Bossak, J.W., & Bieńkowski, W. (2004). Międzynarodowa zdolność konkurencyjna kraju i przedsiębiorstw. Wyzwania dla Polski na progu XXI wieku. SGH, Warszawa.
- 11. Cadestin, C., & Miroudot, S. (2020). Services Exported Together with Goods. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No 236, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/275e520a-en
- 12. Caporale, G.M., Spagnolo, F., & Spagnolo, N. (2018). Exchange rates and macro news in emerging markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 46(16), 516-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.06.007
- 13. Cernat, L., & Kutlina-Dimitrova, Z. (2014). Thinking in a box: A 'mode 5'approach to service trade. Journal of World Trade, 48(6), 1109-1126. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2014039
- 14. Cieślik, E. (2021). Mapowanie produktów polskiego eksportu produktów rolno-spożywczych kierowanego do wybranych krajów Unii Europejskiej w 2020 roku. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 21(4), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.22630/PRS.2021.21.4.15
- 15. Cieślik, E. (2022). A New Era Is Beginning in Central and Eastern Europe: Information and Communication Technology Services Exceed Manufacturing in the Global Production Chain. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 13, 2607-2639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00814-w
- 16. Cunha, N., & Forte, R. (2017). The Comparative advantages in the services sector of developing economies. Global Economy Journal, 17(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2017-0063
- 17. Dalum, B., Laursen, K., & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD export specialization patterns: de-specialization and 'stickiness'. International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692179800000017
- 18. Dhiman, R., Kumar, V., & Rana, S. (2020). Why export competitiveness differs within Indian textile industry? Determinants and empirical evidence. Review of International Business and Strategy, 20(3), 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-03-2020-0021
- 19. Durand, M., Simon, J., & Webb, C. (1992). OECD's Indicators of International Trade and Competitiveness. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 120, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/708306180711
- 20. Eurostat (2024). Services trade by modes of supply. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Services_trade_statistics_by_modes_of_supply
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171703327