Significance of Rules of Origin in European Union's unilateral Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) for Everything But Arms system's beneficiaries1

• Autorzy: Małgorzata Czermińska

Warianty tytułu

Znaczenie reguł pochodzenia towarów w Powszechnym Systemie Preferencji (GSP) Unii Europejskiej dla beneficjentów systemu Everything but Arms

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Kraje najsłabiej rozwinięte (LDC) nie odgrywają znaczącej roli w gospodarce światowej. Podjęto szereg inicjatyw, aby zapewnić tym krajom korzystniejsze warunki dostępu do rynku. Jednym z nich jest unijny program - inicjatywa Wszystko oprócz broni (EBA), zapewniająca bezcłowy i bezkwotowy dostęp do rynku wszystkich produktów z wyjątkiem broni i amunicji. Warunki dostępu do unijnego rynku uzależnione są jednak nie tylko od poziomu stawek celnych, ale także od reguł pochodzenia (RoO), gdyż to od tych ostatnich zależy możliwość zastosowania niższej stawki celnej stosowanej do towarów importowanych. Celem artykułu jest ocena znaczenia reguł pochodzenia towarów w ramach jednostronnego Ogólnego Systemu Preferencji Unii Europejskiej dla beneficjentów systemu EBA, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem zmian wprowadzonych w 2011 roku. Aby osiągnąć postawiony cel, zastosowano nie tylko metody empiryczne (obserwacja pośrednia i opis), ale także metody ogólne, w tym dedukcję i indukcję. Zastosowano następujące techniki badawcze: analizę przyczynowo-skutkową, analizę porównawczą i syntezę. W badaniu wykorzystano dane statystyczne Eurostatu i UNCTAD.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Least developed countries (LDC) play marginal role in the global economy and in the global trading system. The international community has introduced a series of initiatives to provide these countries with more favourable market access conditions. One of them is the European Union's programme - the Everything But Arms (EBA) scheme providing duty-free and quota-free market access to all products except weapons and ammunition. Conditions for access to the EU market, are contingent not only upon the level of customs duty rates, but also rules of origin (RoO), as it is the latter that determines whether a lower rate of customs duty can be applied to imported goods or not. This article's aim is to assess the significance of the rules of origin of goods in the European Union's unilateral Generalised System of Preferences for the EBA system's beneficiaries, with special attention given to changes introduced in 2011. To meet the objective hereof, not only empirical methods were employed (indirect observation and description), but also general methods, including deduction and induction. The following research techniques were used: a cause and effect analysis, a comparative analysis and synthesis. The research is based on statistical data provided by Eurostat and UNCTAD. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Kraj pochodzenia produktu; Metody badawcze; Analiza porównawcza; Analiza przyczyn i skutków wad

EN

Country of origin (COO); Research methods; Comparative analysis; Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)

• Czasopismo: Przegląd Europejski
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 31-51

Twórcy

autor

Małgorzata Czermińska

• Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University

Bibliografia

• ANDERSSON Anna (2016), Export Performance and Access to Intermediate Inputs: The Case of Rules of Origin Liberalisation, "The World Economy", vol. 39, issue 8. DOI: 10.1111/twec.12308
• 2.BALDWIN Richard, EVENETT Simon, LOW Patrick (2009), Beyond tariffs: Multilateralizing non-tariff RTA commitments. In Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System, Cambridge.
• 3.BHATTACHARYA Debapriya, MIKIĆ Mia (eds) (2015), Least Developed Countries and Trade: Challenges of Implementing the Bali package, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations, https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/LDCs%20and%20trade.pdf (31.12.2015).
• 4.BOMBARDA Pamela, GAMBERONI Elisa (2013), Firm heterogeneity, rules of origin, and rules of cumulation, "International Economic Review", vol. 54, no. 1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23352327
• 5.BRENTON Paul, ÖZDEN Çaglar (2009), Trade preferences for apparel and the role of rules of origin: the case of Africa, in: Bernard Hoekman, Will Martin, Carlos Primo Braga (eds), Trade Preference Erosion: Measurement and Policy Response, Washington.
• 6.COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code, OJ L 343, 29.12.2015.
• 7.COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code, OJ L 343, 29.12.2015.
• 8.COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1063/2010 of 18 November 2010 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, OJ L 307, 23.11.2010.
• 9.COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules of Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector, OJ L 350, 31.12.2007.
• 10.CONCONI Paola, GARCIA-SANTANA Manuel, PUCCIO Laura, VENTURINI Roberto (2018), From Final Goods to Inputs: The Protectionist Effect of Rules of Origin, "American Economic Review", vol. 108, no. 8. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20161151
• 11.COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 416/2001 of 28 February 2001 amending Regulation (EC) No 2820/98 applying a multiannual scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period 1 July 1999 to 31 December 2001 so as to extended duty-free access without any quantitative restrictions to products originating in the least developed countries, OJ L 60, 01.03.2001.
• 12.COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 - Statements on a Council Regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004, OJ L 346, 31.12.2001.
• 13.CRIVELLI Pramila, INAMA Stefano (2021), Improving market for LDCs: The impact of the EU Reform of Rules of Origin on Utilization Rates and Trade Flows under the Everything But Arms Initiative (EBA), Working Paper, August 2021, https://www.un.org/ldc5/sites/www.un.org.ldc5/files/t6_inama_eu_reform_2021_16_helsinki_final_20210816_clean.pdf (16.08.2021).
• 14.CRIVELLI Pramila, INAMA Stefano, KASTENG Jonas (2021), Using utilization rates to identify rules of origin reforms: the case of EU free trade area agreements, Working Paper, EUI RSC, 2021/21, https://hdl.handle.net/1814/70396 (31.03.2021).
• 15.CURRAN Louise, NADVI Khalid (2015), Shifting trade preferences and value chain impacts in the Bangladesh textiles and garment industry, "Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society", vol. 8, issue 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv019
• 16.CUSTOMS MANUAL on Preferential Origin (2023), Tax and Duty Manual, Document last updated November 2023, https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/customs/origin/preferential-origin.pdf (30.11.2023).
• 17.CZERMIŃSKA Małgorzata (2019a), Tariff Safeguard Measures of the European Union Market The Role of Common Customs Tariff, "Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego w Zielonej Górze", no. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26366/PTE.ZG.2019.148
• 18.CZERMIŃSKA Małgorzata (2019b), Wspólna polityka handlowa Unii Europejskiej. Znaczenie dla ochrony jednolitego rynku wewnętrznego i międzynarodowego bezpieczeństwa ekonomicznego, Toruń.
• 19.CZERMIŃSKA Małgorzata (2021), Trade relations between EU and African, Caribbean and pacific countries: with or without economic partnership agreements?. "European Research Studies Journal", vol. 24(4).
• 20.CZERMIŃSKA Małgorzata (2023), Znaczenie reguł pochodzenia towarów dla beneficjentów systemu preferencji jednostronnych GSP Unii Europejskiej - kierunki ich zmian po 2010 roku, "Przegląd Zachodni", no. 1-2 (268). DOI: 10.60972/PZ.2023.1.2.239
• 21.EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2010), The European Union's Rules of Origin for the Generalised System of Preferences. A Guide for Users, December 2010, https://bangladesh.eregulations.org/media/EU%20Rules%20of%20Origin.pdf (31.12.2010).
• 22.EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2016a), Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Report on the Generalised Scheme of Preferences covering the period 2014-2015, COM(2016) 29 final, Brussels, 28.01.2016.
• 23.EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2016b), The European Union's Rules of Origin for the Generalised System of Preferences, A Guide for Users, May 2016, https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-09/guide-contents_annex_1_en.pdf (31.05.2016).
• 24.EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2019), Access2Markets, Everything but Arms (EBA), https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/everything-arms-eba (31.01.2019).
• 25.EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2020), Joint report to the European Parliament and the Council: Report on the Generalised Scheme of Preferences covering the period 2018-2019, JOIN(2020)3 final, Brussels, 10.02.2020.
• 26.EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2023a), Generalised System of Preferences, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/calculation-customs-duties/rules-origin/general-aspects-preferential-origin/arrangements-list/generalised-system-preferences_en (29.11.2023).
• 27.EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2023b), REX - Registered Exporter system, https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/online-services/online-services-and-databases-customs/rex-registered-exporter-system_en (14.06.2023).
• 28.EUROSTAT DATA (WWW), https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics (20.08.2023).
• 29.GERATES Dylan, CARROLL Colleen, WILLEMS Arnoud R. (2015), Reconciling Rules of Origin and Global Value Chains: The Case for Reform, "Journal of International Economic Law", vol. 18, issue 2. DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgv017
• 30.GWARDZIŃSKA Ewa, CHOWANIEC Jakub (2021), Zasady i reguły ustalania preferencyjnego pochodzenia towarów w UE, "Doradztwo Podatkowe - Biuletyn Instytutu Studiów Podatkowych", no. 7/2021. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.0500
• 31.HABIB Mohammed Rakib Ibne (2016), Backward Linkages in the Ready Made Garment Industry of Bangladesh: Appraisal and Policy Implications, "The South East Asian Journal of Management", vol. 3, no. 2. DOI: 10.21002/seam.v3i2.5622
• 32.HOEKMAN Bernard M., INAMA Stefano (2017), Rules of Origin as Non-Tariff Measures: Towards Greater Regulatory Convergence, Working Paper, EUI RSCAS, no. 2017/45.
• 33.KELLEHER Sinéad (2012), Playing by the Rules? The Development of an Amended Index to Measure the Impact of Rules of Origin on Intra-PTA Trade Flows, "UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series", no. WP12/22.
• 34.KENNEDY Kevin C. (2012), The generalized system of preferences after four decades: conditionality and the shrinking margin or preference, "Michigan State International Law Review", vol. 20, issue 3.
• 35.MASUM Md. (2016), The Bangladesh textile-clothing industry: A demand-supply review, "Social Systems Research", no. 33.
• 36.NAUMANN Eckart (2009), Rules of Origin in EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), "Issue Paper", no 7.
• 37.NAUMANN Eckart (2011), The EU GSP Rules of Origin: An overview of recent reforms, "Tralac Working Paper", no. SIIWPI2/2011.
• 38.NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE (2022), Government of India, European Union GSP, https://www.nsez.gov.in/Resources/Trade/EU%20GSP.pdf (28.02.2022).
• 39.PIOTROWSKI Jan (2011), Zmiana preferencyjnych reguł pochodzenia w UE, "Wspólnoty Europejskie", no. 1 (206).
• 40.RAHMAN Mustafizur (2014), Trade Benefits for Least Developed Countries: The Bangladesh Case Market Access Initiatives, Limitations and Policy Recommendations, "CDP Background Paper", no. 18.
• 41.TANAKA Kiyoyasu (2020), The EU's reform in rules of origin and international trade: Evidence from Cambodia, "IDE Discussion Papers", no. 770.
• 42.SYTSMA Tobias (2021), Rules of origin and trade preference utilization among least developed countries, "Contemporary Economic Policy", vol. 39, issue 4. DOI: 10.1111/coep.12529
• 43.UNCTAD (2003), Trade Preferences for LDCs: an Early Assessment of Benefits and Possible Improvement, UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/2003/8, New York - Geneva, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/itcdtsbmisc62rev3_en.pdf (31.08.2003).
• 44.UNCTAD (2012), Handbook on Duty-Free Quota-Free and Rules of Origin, New York - Geneva.
• 45.UNCTAD (2013), Handbook on the Rules of Origin of the European Union, New York - Geneva.
• 46.UNCTAD (2021), The Least Developed Countries Report 2021: The least developed countries in the post-COVID world: Learning from 50 years of experience (UNCTAD/LDC/2021), https://unctad.org/publication/least-developed-countries-report-2021 (27.09.2021).
• 47.UNCTAD (2022a), Generalized System of Preferences, Handbook on the Scheme of the European Union, Fifth edition, UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/Misc.25/Rev.5, Geneva, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/itcdtsbmisc25rev5_en.pdf (31.12.2022).
• 48.UNCTAD (2022b), The Least Developed Countries Report 2022: The low-carbon transition and its daunting implications for structural transformation (UNCTAD/LDC/2022), Geneva, https://unctad.org/publication/least-developed-countries-report-2022 (03.11.2022).
• 49.UNCTAD (2023a), Database on GSP utilization, https://gsp.unctad.org/utilization (20.08.2023).
• 50.UNCTAD (2023b), The Generalized System of Preferences. How much does it matter for developing countries?, Geneva, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctsce2023d1_en.pdf (16.06.2023).
• 51.UNITED NATIONS (2023), Creation of the LDC category and timeline of changes to LDC membership and criteria, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Economic Analysis, https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/least-developed-country-category/creation-of-the-ldc-category-and-timeline-of-changes-to-ldc-membership-and-criteria.html (31.08.2023).
• 52.WTO (2023), Trade Policy Review: European Union, Report by the Secretariat, WT/TPR/S/442, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/s442_e.pdf (11.04.2023).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.31338/1641-2478pe.4.23.2