Asymmetric Information in New Investment: Evidence in Indonesia

• Autorzy: Arief Yulianto , Widiyanto Widiyanto , Rini Witiastuti
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Intra-industry sectors are producers of asymmetric information, which in turn has an impact on capital structure decisions. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) differences in debt-equity ratio, growth opportunities, firm age, and firm size as firm characteristics and (2) differences in the effect of growth opportunities, firm age, and firm size on the debt-equity ratio between manufacturing and nonmanufacturing firms. We collected 3,063 observation units consisting of 2,628 manufacturing sectors and 435 non-manufacturing sectors in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and trimmed the data to eliminate the top and bottom 20%. Manufacturing firms are older and more stable, using their profitability to increase information disclosure. Although they produce lower asymmetric information, they do not prefer external financing as an effort to reduce intervention. In contrast, non-manufacturing firms have less tangible assets as a proportion of their total assets than manufacturing firms and therefore produce less asymmetric information of intrinsic value (tangible assets). As a result, manufacturing firms prefer debt issues over equity issues when financing new investments. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Asymetria informacji; Kapitał własny; Zadłużenie przedsiębiorstwa; Finansowanie inwestycji

EN

Information asymmetry; Ownership capital; Company indebtedness; Investment financing

• Czasopismo: Foundations of Management
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: 15
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 177-186

Twórcy

autor

Arief Yulianto

• Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

autor

Widiyanto Widiyanto

• Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

autor

Rini Witiastuti

• Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• Akerlof, G., 1970. The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of FinanceJournal of Economics, No.84.
• Ang, J.S., Jung, M., 1993. An alternate test of Myers' pecking order theory of capital structure: the case of South Korean firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. [online] Avaible at: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0927538X9390015A>.
• Baxamusa, M., Mohanty, S., Rao, R.P., 2015. Information Asymmetry about Investment Risk and Financing Choice. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 42(7-8), pp.947-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12128
• Brito, J.A., John, K., 2002. Leverage and Growth Opportunities: Risk-Avoidance Induced by Risky Debt. SSRN Electronic Journal, No.212. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.269580
• Bulan, L.T., Yan, Z., 2012. Firm Maturity and the Pecking Order Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1760505
• Cariola, A., La Rocca, M., La Rocca, T., 2011. Overinvestment and Underinvestment Problems: Determining Factors, Consequences and Solutions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.835364
• Dang, C.D., Li, F., Yang, C., 2018. Measuring Firm Size in Empirical Corporate Finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, No.86, pp.159-176.
• Das, S., Roy, M., 2007. Inter-Industry Differences in Capital Structure: The Evidence from India. Finance India, Vol.21(2), pp.517.
• Daskalakis, N., Psillaki, M., 2008. Do country or firm factors explain capital structure? Evidence from SMEs in France and Greece. Applied Financial Economics. [online] Avaible at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09603100601018864/>.
• Degryse, H., de Goeij, P., Kappert, P., 2012. The impact of firm and industry characteristics on small firms' capital structure. Small Business Economics. [online] Avaible at:https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11187-010-9281-8.pdf
• Dickinson, V., 2011. Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle. Account. Rev., Vol.86(6). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1268509
• Fama, E.F., French, K.R., 2012. Capital structure choices. Critical Finance Review. [online] Avaible at:https://cfr.pub/published/cfr-002.pdf
• Fama, Eugene F., French, K.R., 2002. Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol.15(1), pp.1-33.
• Financial Services Authority No 13, Pub. L. No. POJK Nomor 31 /Pojk.04/2015, 1 (2015).
• Financial Services Authority. 2020. Financial Services Authority. No 43, pp.1-19.
• Fulghieri, P., García, D., Hackbarth, D., 2020. Asymmetric information and the pecking (Dis)order. Review of Finance, Vol.24(5), pp.961-996. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa005
• Garg, R.K., 1997. Managing Working Capital in a Manufacturing Organization. Vikalpa, Vol.22(4), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919970409
• González, V.M., González, F., 2011. Firm size and capital structure: Evidence using dynamic panel data. Applied Economics. [online] Avaible at:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036846.2011.595690
• Gujarati, D., Porter, D. 2014. Basic Econometrics.
• Klein, L.S., O'Brien, T.J., Peters, S.R., 2002. Debt vs. equity and asymmetric information: A review. Financial Review. [online] Avaible at:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1540-6288.00017
• Lang, L., Ofek, E., Stulz, R.M., 1996. Leverage, Investment, and Firm Growth. Journal of Financial Economics, No.40.
• Martono, S., Yulianto, AP, Wi., 2021. Growth opportunities utilization: debt overhang or asymmetric information?. Foundations of Management, 13, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2021-0000
• Minovic, J., 2019. Serbian road to the EU: Finance, Insurance and Monetary Policy ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION INFLUENCE ON EFFICIENCY OF CAPITAL MARKET. Conference in Serbian Road to the EU: Finance, Insurance and Monetary Policy. [online] Avaible at:https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/95693299.pdf
• Müller, E., 2011. Benefits of Control, Capital Structure and Company Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal, No.05. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.776364
• Mustaruddin, Dinata, A., Wendy, Azazi, A. 2017. Asymmetric Information and Capital Structure: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Vol.7(6), pp.8-15.
• Myers, S., 1977. Determinants of Corporate Borrowing*. Journal of Financial Economics, No.5, pp.147-175. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0846
• Myers, S., 1984. Capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, No.39. [online] Avaible at:https://www.nber.org/papers/w1393
• Myers, S., Majluf, N., 1984. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information The Investors Do Not Have. In NBER Working Paper (Working Paper No. 1396). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)91429-1
• Pervan, M., Pervan, I., Ćurak, M., 2019. Determinants of firm profitability in the Croatian manufacturing industry: evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, Vol.32(1), pp.968-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1583587
• Rocca, M. La, Rocca, T. La, Cariola, A., 2011. Capital structure decisions during a firm's life cycle. Small Business Economics. [online] Avaible at:https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11187-009-9229-z.pdf
• Ross, S., 1977. Determination of Financial Structure: the Incentive-Signalling Approach. Bell J Econ, Vol. 8(1), pp.23-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003485
• Saleh, M., 2018. Impacts of Tangible and Intangible Asset Investment on Value of Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Archives of Business Research, Vol.6(10), 402-414. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.610.5374
• Shyam-Sunder, L., Myers, S., 1999. Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics. [online] Avaible at:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X98000518
• Spiegel, Y., 2019. Asymmetric information models of capital structure, Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-006613-4.50005-9
• Warjiyo, P., 2015. Indonesia: Changing Patterns of Financial Intermediation and Their Implications for Central Bank Policy. In BIS Paper (Issue 83).
• Yulianto, A., Witiastuti, R.S., Widiyanto. (2021). Debt versus equity-open innovation to reduce asymmetric information. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030181

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/fman-2023-0013