Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2021 | 8 | nr 55 | 180-190
Tytuł artykułu

Reflections on Rationality, Utility, University, Mass Culture and Unsustainable Society

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper is an expression of gratitude, remembrance and honour the jubilee of Prof. Tomasz Żylicz. As I have been invited to write a paper for a special issue of the CEEJ journal, I sincerely wanted to express regarding my friendship and my research that have been binding me with Tomasz in my more than 40-year work in the Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw. Our cooperation was varied and rich including joint articles, research projects and our work for the Ministry of the Environment. In this paper, after friendly acknowledgment, I decided to propose my polemical answer to the paper 'Is reason valued now?' written by Tomasz. The subject of my reply is primarily the rationality in general and in the institution of university in the context of teaching and practicing science, including first of all economics and ecological economics. The method applied in this paper is my descriptive and polemical reference to Tomasz's theses with the analytical use of literature, both classics and very current references. The basic topic of the paper focuses on the fact that modernity continues in an increasingly inertial movement towards mass culture and is dominated by three criteria in this mechanism namely usefulness, non-exclusion and accessibility. I analyse these three fetishes in our dynamic times and with particular emphasis on their negative role in academic education. In my conclusions I categorically state that scientific knowledge and education, perfectly represented by universities, were formed and developed in an alliance with usefulness and utility, but never only thanks to them and never only for them. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
8
Numer
Strony
180-190
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Bentham, J. (1788). Defense of Usury. London: Payne & Foss.
  • Bergson, H. (1907). L'Évolution créatrice. Paris: Félix Alcan.
  • Canetti, E. und Macht, M., & Hamburg, C. V. (1960). Trad. ingl. Crowds and Power presso C. Stewart. Hamburg: Claassen.
  • Darwin, K. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.
  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Einstein, A. (1920). Relativity: The Special and General Theory. New York: H. Holt and Company.
  • Erasmus of Rotterdam. (1922). Erasmus in Praise of Folly. New York: Peter Eckler Publishing Co.
  • Freud, S. (1917). Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. Wien: H. Heller.
  • Fromm, E. (1976). Haben oder Sein. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt.
  • Furedi, F. (2004). Where have all the Intelectuals Gone? London: Bloomsbury.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). System der Wissenschaft. Erster Teil, Die Fänomenologie des Geistes. Bamberg und Würzburg: Joseph Anton Gebhardt.
  • Huxley, A. (1932). New Brave World. London: Chatto & Windus.
  • Jaspers, K. (1946). Die Idee der Universität. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  • Marx, K. (1887). Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. London: Swan Sonnenschein, Lowrey & Co.
  • Nietzsche, F. (1908). Ecce Homo. Wie man wird, was man ist. Leipzig: Insel Verlag.
  • Rodrik, D. (2015). Economics Rules: Why Economics Works, When it Fails, and How to tell the Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sloterdijk, P. (2000). Die Verachtung der Massen: Versuch über Kulturkämpfe in der modernen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Edition Suhrkamp.
  • Spencer, H. (1864). Principles of Biology. Vol. 1. London: Williams & Norgate.
  • Śleszyński, J. (1986). Społeczne systemy wartości a presja na środowisko przyrodnicze. Warszawa: EKO2, Zeszyt 8601, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
  • Śleszyński, J., Żylicz, T. (1986). Warszawa jako przedmiot badań ekonomiczno-ekologicznych. Warszawa: EKO2, Zeszyt 8616, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
  • von Mises, L. (1957). Theory and History. Yale: Yale University Press.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171659816
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.