The Performance of Max-GWMA Control Chart in the Presence of Measurement Errors

• Autorzy: Saeid Sharafi , Mohammad Reza Maleki , Ali Salmasnia , Reihaneh Mansoor
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Recently, simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variability has gained increasing attention. By departing from the accurate measurements assumption, this paper investigates the effect of gauge measurement errors on the performance of the maximum generally weighted moving average (Max-GWMA) chart for simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variability under an additive covariate model. Multiple measurements procedure is employed to compensate for the undesired impact of gauge inaccuracy on detection capability of the Max- GWMA chart. Simulation experiments in terms of average run length (ARL) are conducted to assess the power of the developed chart to detect different out-of-control scenarios. The results confirm that the gauge inaccuracy affects the sensitivity of the Max-GWMA chart. Moreover, the results show that taking multiple measurements per item adequately decreases the adverse effect of measurement errors. Finally, a real-life example is presented to demonstrate how measurement errors increases the false alarm rate of the Max-GWMA chart. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Kontrola produkcji; Karty kontrolne; Pomiary; Błędy pomiarowe

EN

Production control; Control charts; Measurement; Measuring errors

• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 13
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 26-37

Twórcy

autor

Saeid Sharafi

• University of Qom, Iran

autor

Mohammad Reza Maleki

• Isfahan University of Technology, Iran

autor

Ali Salmasnia

• University of Qom, Iran

autor

Reihaneh Mansoor

• University of Eyvanekey, Iran

Bibliografia

• Amiri A., Ghashghaei R., Maleki, M.R. (2018), On the effect of measurement errors in simultaneous monitoring of mean vector and covariance matrix of multivariate processes, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, No. 1, Vol. 40, pp. 318-330.
• Asif F., Khan S., Noor-ul-Amin, M. (2020), Hybrid Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Chart with Measurement Error, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transaction A-Science, Vol. 44, pp. 801-811.
• Chen G., Cheng S.W., Xie H. (2001), Monitoring process mean and variability with one EWMA chart, Journal of Quality Technology, No. 2, Vol. 33, pp. 223-233.
• Cheng X.B., Wang F.K. (2018), The performance of EWMA median and CUSUM median control charts for a normal process with measurement errors, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 2, Vol. 34, pp. 203-213.
• Domangue R., Patch S.C. (1991), Some omnibus exponentially weighted moving average statistical process monitoring schemes, Technometrics, No. 3, Vol. 33, pp. 299-313.
• Ghashghaei R., Bashiri M., Amiri A., Maleki M.R. (2016), Effect of measurement error on joint monitoring of process mean and variability under ranked set sampling, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 8, Vol. 32, pp. 3035-3050.
• Hawkins D.M., Maboudou-Tchao E.M. (2008), Multivariate exponentially weighted moving covariance matrix, Technometrics, No. 2, Vol. 50, pp. 155-166.
• Khalafi S., Salmasnia A., Maleki M.R. (2020), Remedial approaches to decrease the effect of measurement errors on simple linear profile monitoring, International Journal for Quality Research, No. 4, Vol. 14.
• Khati Dizabadi A., Shahrokhi M., Maleki M.R. (2016), On the effect of measurement error with linearly increasing-type variance on simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variability, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 5, Vol. 32, pp. 1693-1705.
• Linna K.W., Woodall W.H. (2001), Effect of measurement error on Shewhart control charts, Journal of Quality Technology, No. 2, Vol. 33, pp. 213-222.
• Maleki M.R., Amiri A., Castagliola P. (2017), Measurement errors in statistical process monitoring: A literature review, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 103, pp. 316-329.
• Maleki M.R., Salmasnia A. (2017), Joint Monitoring of Process Location and Dispersion Based on CUSUM Procedure and Generalized Likelihood Ratio in the Presence of Measurement Errors, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 7, Vol. 33, pp. 1485-1498.
• Maleki M.R., Shamseddin B., Eghbali H., Bazda A. (2022a), The effect of gauge measurement errors on double sampling control chart. Communications in Statistics-XTheory and Methods, In Press. DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1958848.
• Maleki M.R., Salmasnia A., Yarmohammadi Saber S. (2022b), The Performance of Triple Sampling X Control Chart with Measurement Errors, Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, In Press. DOI: 10.1080/16843703.2022.2040702.
• Nguyen H.D., Nguyen Q.T., Nguyen T.H., Balakrishnan N., Tran K.P. (2020a), The Performance of the EWMA Median Chart in the Presence of Measurement Error, Artificial Intelligence Evolution, pp. 48-62.
• Nguyen H.D., Tran K.P., Celano G., Maravelakis P.E., Castagliola P. (2020b), On the effect of the measurement error on Shewhart t and EWMA t control charts, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 107, pp. 4317-4332.
• Noor-ul-Amin M., Javaid A., Hanif M., Dogu E. (2022), Performance of maximum EWMA control chart in the presence of measurement error using auxiliary information, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, In Press. DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2020.1772301.
• Quesenberry C.P. (1995), On properties of Q charts for variables, Journal of Quality Technology, No. 3, Vol. 27, pp. 184-203.
• Roberts S.W. (2000), Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages, Technometrics, No. 1, Vol. 42, pp. 97-101.
• Salmasnia A., Maleki M.R., Niaki S.T.A. (2018a), Remedial measures to lessen the effect of imprecise measurement with linearly increasing variance on the performance of the MAX-EWMAMS scheme, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, No. 6, Vol. 43, pp. 3151-3162.
• Salmasnia A., Namdar M., Noroozi M. (2018b), Robust design of a VP-NCS chart for joint monitoring mean and variability in series systems under maintenance policy, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 124, pp. 220-236.
• Sheu, S.H., Griffith, W.S. (1996), Optimal numer of minimal repairs before replacement of a system subject to shocks. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), No. 3, Vol. 43, 319-333.
• Sheu S.H., Huang C.J., Hsu T.S. (2012), Extended maximum generally weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean and variability, Computers & Industrial Engineering, No. 1, Vol. 62, pp. 216-225.
• Sheu S.H., Lin T.C. (2003), The generally weighted moving average control chart for detecting small shifts in the process mean, Quality Engineering, No. 2, Vol. 16, pp. 209-231.
• Sheu S.H., Tai S.H. (2006), Generally weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process variability, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, No. 5-6, Vol. 30, pp. 452-458.
• Tang A., Castagliola P., Hu X., Sun J. (2019), The performance of the adaptive EWMA median chart in the presence of measurement error, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 1, Vol. 35, pp. 423-438.
• Tang A., Castagliola P., Sun J., Hu X. (2018), The effect of measurement errors on the adaptive EWMA chart, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 4, Vol. 34, pp. 609-630.
• Tran P.H., Tran K.P., Rakitzis A. (2019), A synthetic median control chart for monitoring the process mean with measurement errors, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 4, Vol. 35, pp. 1100-1116.
• Xie H. (1999), Contributions to qualimetry [PhD thesis]. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba.
• Yousefi S., Maleki M.R., Salmasnia A., Anbohi M.K. (2022), Performance of multivariate homogeneously weighted moving average chart for monitoring the process mean in the presence of measurement errors, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, In Press, DOI: 10.1142/S0219686723500026.
• Zaidi F.S., Castagliola P., Tran K.P., Khoo M.B.C. (2020), Performance of the MEWMA-CoDa control chart in the presence of measurement errors, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, No. 7, Vol. 36, pp. 2411-2440.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2022.142392