Sustainable Management in the Time of Uncertainty on the Cruise Shipping Market

• Autorzy: Joanna Kizielewicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose. The aim of this article is to identify areas of uncertainty that may affect sustainable management in the cruise shipping market in Northern Europe and define the directions of sustainable management undertaken by the entities participating in this market.
Design/methodology/approach. Several research methods were used in the work, i.e., analysis of existing materials, desk research, exploratory method, and case studies. Comparative analysis and critical analysis were also carried out. A few research questions were also developed and are described in the methodology section.
Findings. The statements showed that cruise shipping companies have been strongly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the war with Russia, which also to some extent forced them to revise their priorities within sustainable management. Practical implications. Examples of good practice on sustainable management may be an interesting cognitive source of knowledge, both for the representatives of seaports in coastal destinations, as well as for cruise shipping companies. Social implications. The cruise shipowners' awareness of the negative impact of cruise shipping development upon the quality of local communities' life in coastal destinations is considered to be a key aspect of sustainable management.
Originality/value. The review of literature revealed a lack of publications regarding the issue of sustainable management in the cruise shipping market, particularly with a view to changing the approach to sustainable management in the context of the events faced by cruise lines and seaports around the world in recent years. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Żegluga morska; Turystyka morska; Przedsiębiorstwo żeglugowe; Rozwój zrównoważony; Niepewność w gospodarce

EN

Sea navigation; Maritime tourism; Shipping company; Sustainable development; Uncertainty in the economy

• Czasopismo: International Journal of Contemporary Management
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 1-14

Twórcy

autor

Joanna Kizielewicz

• Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

• Barnett, M. L. (2019). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Business & Society, 58(1), 167-190.
• Beckmann, M., Schaltegger, S., & Landrum, N. E. (2020). Sustainability management from a responsible management perspective. In O. Laasch, R. Suddaby, E. Freeman, & Jamali, D. (Eds.) The Research Handbook of Responsible Management. Edward Elgar.
• Brida, J. G., & Zapata, S. Cruises tourism: economic, socio-cultural and environmental impacts. (2010). International Journal of Leisure and Tourism Marketing, 1(3), 205-226.
• Carnival Corporation & plc. (2020). Sustainable from ship to shore: 2020 sustainability report. Carnival Corporation & plc. https://carnivalsustainability-2022.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/assets/content/pdf/2020-Sustainability-Report_Carnival-Corporation-plc.pdf
• Carnival Corporation & plc. (2021). Sustainable from ship to shore: 2021 sustainability report. Carnival Corporation & plc. https://carnivalsustainability-2022.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/assets/content/pdf/FY-2021-Sustainability-Report_Carnival-Corporation-and-plc.pdf
• Chalmeta, R. & Palomero, S. (2011). Methodological proposal for business sustainability management by means of the balanced scorecard. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1344-1356.
• Cruise market watch: Cruise pulse https://cruisemarketwatch.com/cruise-pulse/
• Conkright, T. (2015). Using the four functions of management for sustainable employee engagement. Performance Improvement, 54(8), 3-7.
• Cruise Baltic. (2021). Baltic call numbers, 2021 and est. 2022. Cruise Baltic. https://api.cruisebaltic.com/media/7202/calls-passengers-and-turnarounds-2021.pdf
• Cruise Baltic. (2022). Cruise Baltic market review 2022. Cruise Baltic. https://api.cruisebaltic.com/media/7201/cruise-baltic-market-review-2000-2022.pdf.
• Cruise Lines International Association. (2021a) 2020 European Market Report. Cruise Lines International Association.
• Cruise Lines International Association. (2021b). 2021 Global Market Report. Cruise Lines International Association. https://cruising.org/-/media/clia-media/research/2022/2021-1r-clia-001-overview-global.ashx
• Cruise Lines International Association. (2021c) 2021 State of The Cruise Industry Outlook. Cruise Lines International Association. https://cruising.org/-/media/research-updates/research/2021-state-of-the-cruise-industry_optimized.pdf
• Cruise market watch: Cruise pulse. (2022) https://cruisemarketwatch.com/cruise-pulse/
• Czech, M. (2022). Rekordowy rok wycieczkowców w Gdańsku: Ponad 100 statków zawinie do Portu Gdańsk w 2022. https://dziennikbaltycki.pl/rekordowy-rok-wycieczkowcow-w-gdansku-ponad-100-statkow-zawinie-do-portu-gdansk-w-2022/ar/c7-16255035
• Dąbrowska, A. & Janoś-Kresło, M. (2012). Etyka działalności przedsiębiorstwa a etyka postępowania konsumentów. Marketing i Rynek, 1, 10-11.
• Dyllick, T. & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141.
• Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century. Capstone Publishing Ltd.
• European Parliament. (2012). Directive 2012/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012: The Sulphur Content of Marine Fuels. European Union.
• Gątarska, M. K. (2016). Źródła konfliktów występujące w organizacji. Ekonomia i Zarządzanie 2(9). http://wyd.edu.pl/images/Czasopisma_naukowe/Ekonomia_Zarzadzanie_2_2016/EiZ_2016_4/Gatarska_EiZ_4_2016.pdf
• Genç, R. (2016). Sustainability in cruise ship management. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(6), 76.
• HELCOM. (1974). The Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, Helsinki Convention. https://helcom.fi/about-us/convention/
• Hochberg, M. (2021). Royal Caribbean new cruise ship health protocols. https://www.royalcaribbeanblog.com/
• Holland, J., Mazzarol, T., Soutar, G., Tapsall, S., & Elliott, W. A. (2021). Cruise passengers' risk reduction strategies in the wake of COVID-19. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 26(11), 1109-1206.
• International Maritime Organization. (2015). 2015 Guidelines for exhaust gas cleaning systems: Resolution MEPC.259(68). International Maritime Organzation. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.259(68).pdf
• International Maritime Organization. (2016). Nitrogen oxides (NOx): Regulation 13. International Maritime Organization. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Nitrogen-oxides-(NOx)-–-Regulation-13.aspx
• International Maritime Organization. (2019). Strategy, planning and reform. International Maritime Organization. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/Documents/SDG_Strategy and planning.pdf
• Janecki, J. (2020). Rola radykalnej niepewności w gospodarce. In M. Matusewicz & R. Bartkowiak (Eds.). Nowe wyzwania w naukach o gospodarce, (pp. 125-132). SGH Oficyna Wydawnicza.
• Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2016). The environmental, social and economic impacts of cruising and corporate sustainability strategies. Athens Journal of Tourism, 3(4), 273-283.
• Kakowska-Mehring, W. (2022). Wycieczkowce omijają Petersburg, skorzysta Trójmiasto. trojmiasto.pl. https://biznes.trojmiasto.pl/Wycieczkowce-wracaja-do-trojmiejskich-portow-a-omijaja-Petersburg-n165786.html
• Kizielewicz, J. (2020). COVID-19 consequences and travel insurance policy in leading cruise shipping corporations. European Research Studies Journal, 13(4), 600-611.
• Kizielewicz, J. (2021). Eco-trends in energy solutions on cruise ships. Energies, 14(13), 3746.
• Klein, R. A. (2011). Responsible cruise tourism: Issues of cruise tourism and sustainability. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 18(1), 107-118.
• Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.
• Knoepfel, P. & Nahrath, S. (2005). Sustainable management of natural resources: From traditional environmental protection policies towards institutional natural resource regimes. IDHEAP.
• Kotnis, M. (2014). Modele zarządzania ryzykiem w warunkach niepewności. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 65, 669-678. http://www.wneiz.univ.szczecin.pl/nauka_wneiz/frfu/65-2014/FRFU-65-669.pdf
• Koźmiński, A. (2004). Zarządzanie w warunkach niepewności. PWN.
• Långstedt, J., Spohr J., Hellström M., Tsvetkova, A., Niemelä, E., Sjöblom, J., Eriksson, J., & Wikström, K. (2022). Customer perceptions of COVID-19 countermeasures on passenger ships during the pandemic. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 13(3), 100518.
• Loew, T., Werner, F., Lehuede, J., M., Izquierdo, C., & Samayoa, E. (2019). A sustainability management system that meets all standards: An analysis of international frameworks and guidelines identifying the most relevant elements for modern sustainability management.
• Mondi Group. (2018). Sustainable development policies. https://www.mondigroup.com/media/9119/mondi-sustainable-development-policies-2018-final.pdf
• Norwegian Cruise Lines Holdings Ltd. (2022). Sail & Sustain: 2021 ESG Report. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
• Pabian, A. (2015). Zrównoważone zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi: Zarys problematyki. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej, 17, 7-16.
• Pabian, A. (2017). Zrównoważone przedsiębiorstwo jako rezultat zmian organizacyjnych. Przegląd Organizacji, 8(931), 11-16.
• Pera, J. (2012). Niepewność a problem mitygacji ryzyka w przedsiębiorstwie. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 1(1), 91-101.
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 60-77.
• Qian, Y. (2016). Sustainable management of water resources. Engineering, 2, 23-25.
• Royal Caribbean Group. (2020). Sustainability. Royal Caribbean Group.
• Royal Caribbean Group. (2022). Seastainability: 2021 Environmental, social, and governance report. Royal Caribbean Group. https://www.royalcaribbeangroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/RCG-ESG-Report-2021_06.pdf
• Roosa, S. A. (2010). Sustainable development handbook (2nd ed.). Fairmont Press.
• Rosińska-Bukowska, M. & Bukowski, J. (2014). Zrównoważone zarządzanie: Główne wyzwanie rozwojowe dla współczesnych organizacji. In I. Staniec (Ed.). Natura i uwarunkowania ryzyka. (pp. 41-55). Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej.
• Ruedig, J. & Metzger, A., B. (2013). Managing organizational sustainability: The business case for sustainability professionals in the workplace. U.S. Green Building Council. https://centerforgreenschools.org/sites/default/files/resource-files/ManagingSustainability_11_8_13.pdf
• Sikorski, C. (1999). Zachowania ludzi w organizacji. PWN.
• Silva, C. & Gouveia, J. B. (2016). A process to implement the sustainability in organizational management: Support tools. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(8), 186-199.
• Szelągowska-Rudzka, K. (2016). Actions objected at employees in CSR: Report from the study. Management, 20(2), 143-159.
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
• Waśniewska, A., Skrzeszewska, K., & Vrdoljak Raguž, I. (2016). A comparative analysis of chosen determinants of the Croatian and Polish human capital in the context of the strategy Europe 2020. (Conference session). 5th International Scientific Symposium Economy of Eastern Croatia.
• Willett, A. H. (1901). The economic theory of risk and insurance. Columbia University Press.
• Wolska, G., (2018). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu., Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny, 80(1), 301-310.
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ijcm-2022-0016