The Nature and Character of the Public Markets and Their Effects on Public Procurement in the European Union

• Autorzy: Christopher Bovis

Warianty tytułu

Natura i charakter rynków publicznych oraz ich wpływ na zamówienia publiczne w Unii Europejskiej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Regulacja zamówień publicznych koncentruje się na rynku wewnętrznym Unii Europejskiej i jego funkcjonowaniu zgodnie z podstawowymi swobodami. Ma ona na celu określenie zachowania sektora publicznego posiadającego dynamikę podobną do rynków prywatnych. Regulacja zamówień publicznych odzwierciedla jednak cechy rynków tego sektora, stanowiących kategorię samą w sobie, których cechą charakterystyczną jest realizacja interesu publicznego. Rynki te określane są jako rynki publiczne, różniące się od rynków prywatnych rodzajem bodźca do działania. Rynki publiczne mają za zadanie realizację interesu publicznego, podczas gdy rynki prywatne są po to, by przedsiębiorcy mogli osiągać zyski. Regulacja zamówień publicznych opiera się na harmonizacji, która jako proces kreowania prawa i polityki została wybrana przez instytucje europejskie do tworzenia regulacji za pośrednictwem dyrektyw. Dyrektywy są instrumentami prawnymi zapewniającymi ramy do wdrażania dorobku wspólnotowego, umożliwiając jednocześnie wymaganą elastyczność poprzez swobodę decyzyjną przyznaną państwom członkowskim co do form i metod ich wdrażania. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The regulation of public procurement in the European Union focuses on the internal market and its function in accordance with the fundamental freedoms. It aims at installing a behaviour for the public sector which is similar dynamics to the function of private markets. However, the regulation of public procurement reflects a characteristic of the relevant markets which is sui generis and has as main feature the pursuit public interest. These markets are referred to as public markets, which are distinct from private markets in their driver. Public markets exist to deliver public interest, whereas private markets exist to allow operators pursue profit. The regulation of public procurement rests on harmonisation which as a legal and policy process has been selected by European institutions to convey such regulation through directives. The latter are legal instruments which provide frameworks for implementation of the acquis communautaire but allow the required flexibility through discretion which is afforded to Member States in relation to the forms and methods of their implementation. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zamówienia publiczne; Harmonizacja; Rynek publiczny; Sektor publiczny; Regulacje prawne

EN

Public procurement; Harmonisation; Public market; Public sector; Legal regulations

• Czasopismo: Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: Vol. 31, nr 4
• Strony: 9-27

Twórcy

autor

Christopher Bovis

• University of Hull, United Kingdom

Bibliografia

• Bovis C., Developing Public Procurement Regulation: Jurisprudence and Its Influence on Law Making, "Common Market Law Review" 2006, vol. 43(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2006003.
• Bovis C., La notion et les attributions d'organisme de droit public comme pouvoirs adjudicateurs dans le régime des marchés publics, Contrats Publics, Septembre 2003.
• Bovis C., Public Procurement: Case Law and Regulation, Oxford 2006.
• Bovis C., Public Procurement in the EU: Jurisprudence and Conceptual Directions, "Common Market Law Review" 2012, vol. 49(1).
• Bovis C., Recent Case Law Relating to Public Procurement: A Beacon for the Integration of Public Markets, "Common Market Law Review" 2002, vol. 39(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/5102435.
• Bovis C., The Effects of the Principles of Transparency and Accountability on Public Procurement Regulation, [in:] Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration, eds. H. Hoffman, A. Türk, Cheltenham 2009.
• Bovis C., The Law of EU Public Procurement, Oxford 2015.
• Cecchini P., The European Challenge, 1992: The Benefits of a Single Market, Aldershot 1988.
• Flamme M.-A., Flamme P., Enfin L'Europe des Marchés Publics: La nouvelle directive travaux, "AJDA - L'Actualite Juridique Droit Administratif" 1989, vol. 45(11).
• Graells A.S., Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules, Oxford 2011.
• Head K., Mayer T., Non-Europe: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU, "Review of World Economics" 2000, vol. 136(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707689.
• Holland D., Barrell R., Fic T., Hurst I., Liadze I., Orazgani A., Whitworth R., Global Prospects and Sources of Economic Growth, "National Institute Economic Review" 2010, vol. 212, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950110373209.
• Ilzkovitz F., Dierx A., Kovacs A.V., Sousa N., Steps Towards a Deeper Economic Integration: The Internal Market in the 21st Century - A Contribution to the Single Market Review, Brussels 2007.
• Lunsdgaard J., Competition and Efficiency in Publicly Funded Services, OECD Economics Department Working Paper 2002, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2002-art10-en.
• Nowicki P., Aksjologia prawa zamówień publicznych. Pomiędzy efektywnością a instrumentalizacją, Toruń 2019.
• Rhodes R.A.W., Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Philadelphia 1997.
• Valadou P., La notion de pouvoir adjudicateur en matière de marchés de travaux, "Semaine Juridique" 1991, no. 3.
• Wettenhall R., Thynne I., Emerging Patterns of Governance: Synergies, Partnerships and the Public-Private Mix, "International Journal of Public-Private Partnerships" 2000, vol. 3(1).
• ONLINE SOURCES
• WS Atkins Management Consultants, The "Costs of Non-Europe" in Public Sector Procurement, 1988, http://aei.pitt.edu/47968/1/A9312.pdf (access: 8.12.2022).
• MISCELLANEOUS
• Communication from the Commission, Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, COM (2010) 2020 final.
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Single Market Act Twelve Levers to Boost Growth and Strengthen Confidence: "Working Together to Create New Growth", COM(2011) 206 final.
• Completing the Internal Market: White Paper from the Commission to the European Council (Milan, 28-29 June 1985), COM(85) 310, June 1985.
• European Commission, Buying Social: A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement, SEC(2010) 1258 final.
• European Commission, Communication on Public Procurement in the European Union, COM (98) 143.
• European Commission, Communication to the European Council and the European Parliament, the European and Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industry Policy Action Plan, (2008) 397/3.
• European Commission, Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Towards a Single Market Act, COM(2010) 608 final.
• European Commission, Guide to the Application of the European Union Rules on State Aid, Public Procurement and the Internal Market to Services of General Economic Interest, and in Particular to Social Services of General Interest, 7.12.2010, SEC(2010) 1545 final.
• European Commission, The Opening-up of Public Procurement to Foreign Direct Investment in the European Community, CC 93/79, 1995.
• Green Paper on Public Procurement in the European Union: Exploring the way forward, European Commission 1996.
• Green Paper on the Modernization of EU Public Procurement Policy: Towards a More Efficient European Procurement Market, COM(2011) 15/47.
• Report from the Commission Concerning Negotiations Regarding Access of Community Undertakings to the Markets of Third Countries in Fields Covered by the Directive 2004/17/EC, COM(2009) 592 final, 28.10.2009.
• LEGAL ACTS
• Commission interpretative communication on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the Public Procurement Directives (OJ C 179/2, 1.8.2006).
• Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ L 395/33, 30.12.1989).
• Council Directive 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992 coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ L 76/14, 23.3.1992).
• Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134/114, 30.4.2004).
• Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (OJ L 94/1, 28.3.2014).
• Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94/65, 28.3.2014).
• Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94/243, 28.3.2014).
• CASE LAW
• C-117/76 and C-16/77 Ruckdeschel and Others [1977] ECR 1753.
• C-201/85 and C-202/85 Klensch and Others [1986] ECR 3477.
• C-45/87 Commission v Ireland [1988] ECR I-4929.
• C-31/87 Gebroeders Beentjes B.V. v State of Netherlands [1988] ECR 4635.
• C-243/89 Commission v Denmark (Storebælt) [1993] ECR I-3353.
• C-37/92 Vanacker and Lesage [1993] ECR I-4947.
• C-87/94 Commission v Belgium [1996] ECR I-2043.
• C-343/95 Diego Cali et Figli [1997] ECR I-1547.
• C-360/96 BFI Holding [1998] ECR I-6821.
• C-360/96 Gemeente Arnhem Gemeente Rheden v BFI Holding BV [1998] ECR 6821.
• C-44/96 Mannesmann Anlangenbau Austria AG et al. v Strohal Rotationsdurck GesmbH [1998] ECR I-73.
• C-176/98 Holst Italia [1999] ECR I-8607.
• C-107/98 Teckal [1999] ECR I-8121.
• C-275/98 Unitron Scandinavia [1999] ECR I-8291.
• C-225/98 Commission v French Republic (Nord-Pas-de-Calais) [2000] ECR 7445.
• C-324/98 Telaustria and Telefonadress [2000] ECR I-10745.
• C-380/98 University of Cambridge [2000] ECR I-8035.
• C-223/99 Agora Srl v Ente Autonomo Fiera Internazionale di Milano and C-260/99 Excelsior Snc di Pedrotti Runa & C v Ente Autonomo Fiera Internazionale di Milano [2001] ECR 3605.
• C-237/99 Commission v France (OPAC) [2001] ECR I-939.
• C-324/99 DaimlerChrysler [2001] ECR I-9897.
• C 285/99 and C 286/99 Lombardini and Mantovani [2001] ECR I 9233.
• C-399/98 Ordine degli Architetti and Others [2001] ECR I-5409.
• C-59/00 Vestergaard [2001] ECR I-9505.
• C-513/99 Concordia Bus Filandia Oy Ab v Helsingin Kaupunki et HKL-Bussiliikenne [2002] ECR 7213.
• C-92/00 HI [2002] ECR I-5553.
• C-442/00 Rodríguez Caballero [2002] ECR I-11915.
• C-470/99 Universale-Bau and Others [2002] ECR I-11617.
• C-373/00 Adolf Truley [2003] ECR-193.
• C-322/01 Deutscher Apothekerverband [2003] ECR I-14887.
• C-448/01 EVN AG, Wienstrom GmbH and Republik Österreich [2003] ECR I-14527.
• C-315/01 (GAT) and Österreichische Autobahnen und Schnellstraßen AG (ÖSAG) ECR [2003] I-6351.
• C-244/02 Kauppatalo Hansel Oy [2003] ECR I-12139.
• C-18/01 Korhonen and Others [2003] ECR I-5321.
• C-57/01 Makedoniko Metro and Mihaniki [2003] ECR I-1091.
• C-496/99 P Commission v CAS Succhi di Frutta [2004] ECR I-3801.
• C-126/03 Commission v Germany [2004] ECR I-11197.
• C-314/01 Siemens and ARGE Telekom & Partner [2004] ECR I-2549.
• C-264/03 Commission v France [2005] ECR I-8831.
• C-158/03 Commission v Spain and C-234/03 Contse and Others [2005] ECR I-9315.
• C-231/03 Coname [2005] ECR I-7287.
• C-231/03 Consorzio Aziende Metano (Coname) v Comune di Cingia de' Botti [2005] ECR I-7287.
• C-458/03 Parking Brixen [2005] ECR I-8585.
• C-26/03 Stadt Halle and RPL Lochau [2005] ECR I-1.
• C-26/03 Stadt Halle, RPL Recyclingpark Lochau GmbH v Arbeitsgemeinschaft Thermische Restabfall- und Energieverwertungsanlage TREA Leuna [2005] ECR I-1.
• C-507/03 Commission v Ireland (An Post) [2007] ECR I-9777.
• C-220/06 Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia v Administración General del Estado [2007] ECR I-12175.
• C-295/05 Asociación Nacional de Empresas Forestales (Asemfo) v Transformación Agraria SA (Tragsa) and Administración del Estado [2007] ECR I-2999.
• C-220/05 Jean Auroux and Others v Commune de Roanne [2007] ECR I-385.
• C-147/06 Commission v Ireland [2007] ECR I-0000.
• C-382/05 Commission v Italy [2007] ECR I-6657.
• C-6/05 Medipac-Kazantzidis AE v Venizelio-Pananio (PE.S.Y. KRITIS) [2007] ECR I-4557.
• C-480/06 Commission v Germany [2009] ECR I-04747.
• C-412/04 Commission v Italy [2008] ECR I-0000.
• C-437/07 Commission v Italy [2008] ECR I 0000.
• C-148/06 SECAP SpA and Santorso Soc. coop. arl [2008] ECR I-3565.
• C-324/07 Coditel Brabant SA v Commune d'Uccle, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale [2009] 1 CMLR 29.
• C-206/08 WAZV Gotha v. Eurawasser Aufbereitungs [2009] ECR I-8377.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17951/sil.2022.31.4.9-27