Industry 4.0 Technologies as Enablers of Sustainability Risk Management

• Autorzy: Barbara Ocicka , Waldemar Rogowski , Jolanta Turek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Motivation: Companies operate in a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) business environment, as evidenced by massive collapses in commodity prices, acts of terrorism, cyber security threats, natural disasters, technological failures, and pandemics. Numerous reports indicate that the top risks with the highest probability of occurrence in the next decade include extreme weather events, failure of climate protection measures, and man-made environmental damage (The Global Risk Report 2021 of the World Economic Forum, The World Business Council for Sustainable Development report and many others). The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) cover the above challenges and define the agenda for solving them to 2030. The intensification of environmental and social risks reinforces the need to deepen research and explore new ways of managing sustainability risks (SRs). At the same time, businesses are undergoing the technology transformation (Industry 4.0) accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It became necessary to shift some investment to this business area, which also needs to be supported by additional capital. The technology-driven transformation can significantly support companies in managing SRs. Aim: The aim of the study is to diagnose the importance of investments in Industry 4.0 technologies (T4.0) as potential enablers supporting sustainability risk management from the perspective of supply chains. Results: SRs represent one of the critical risk areas of the 21st century. Despite the well-recognized potential of the T4.0 implementation for sustainable supply chain management, the research studies concentrated on their potential role within SR management in international supply chains are limited and fragmented. The diagnosis of the growing importance of T4.0 supporting risk management at strategic and operational levels of business activities implies the recommendation to integrate their use in this area into the technological transformation, and then consistently into planning and financing of development and implementation projects. Companies may attempt to address these challenges through Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarządzanie ryzykiem; Łańcuch dostaw; Inwestycje; Przemysł 4.0

EN

Risk management; Supply chain; Investment; Industry 4.0

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Prawo
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 21
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 727-740

Twórcy

autor

Barbara Ocicka

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Waldemar Rogowski

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Jolanta Turek

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Abdul Razak, S.E., Mustapha, M., Abu Kasim, N.A., & Mohamed, S. (2020). Sustainability risk management using failure mode effect analysis: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 20(10s), 357-372.
• Bai, L.B., Li, Y., Du, Q., & Xu, Y.D. (2017). A fuzzy evaluation model for sustainability risk evaluation of PPP projects. Sustainability, 9(10), 1890; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101890.
• Beier, G., Niehoff, S., Ziems, T., & Xue, B. (2017). Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry: a comparative study from China and Germany. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(2), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0028-8.
• Busse, Ch., Schleper, M.C., Weilenmann, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). Extending the supply chain visibility boundary: utilizing stakeholders for identifying supply chain sustainability risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(1), 18-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2015-0043.
• COSO. (2022). Guidance on enterprise risk management. Retrieved 06.09.2022 from https://www.coso.org/SitePages/Guidance-on-Enterprise-Risk-Management.aspx?web=1.
• European Commission. (2021). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: EU taxonomy, corporate sustainability reporting, sustainability preferences and fiduciary duties: directing finance towards the European green deal (COM/2021/188 final).
• FERMA. (2019). Artificial intelligence applied to risk management. Retrieved 06.09.2022 from https://www.ferma.eu/app/uploads/2019/11/FERMA-AI-applied-to-RM-FINAL.pdf.
• FERMA. (2021). People, planet & performance: the contribution of enterprise risk management to sustainability. Retrieved 06.09.2022 from https://www.ferma.eu/app/uploads/2021/03/Ferma-sustainability_2021_final.pdf.
• Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: a risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(4), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijper.2015.06.032.
• Høgevold, N., Svensson, G., Wagner, B., Petzer, D., Klopper, H.B., Sosa, J.C., Padin, C., & Ferro, C. (2014). Sustainable business models : corporate reasons, economic effects, social boundaries, environmental actions and organizational challenges in sustainable business practices. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(3), 357-380. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-09-2013-0147.
• Johnston, J., & Soileau, J. (2020). Enterprise risk management and accruals estimation error. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 16(3), 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100209.
• Lachapelle, E., & Hundozi, B. (2015). Risk management: principles and guidelines. Retrieved 27.02.2022 from https://pecb.com/en/whitepaperDownloadImage?file=pecb-whitepaper_iso-31000_60BAF30FCA636FF4C8EA3F1807E60A25.pdf.
• Lenssen, J.-J., Dentchev, N.A., & Roger, L. (2014). Sustainability, risk management and governance: towards an integrative approach. Corporate Governance, 14(5), 670-684. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2014-0077.
• Nowicka, K. (2020). Zielone łańcuchy dostaw 4.0. In J. Gajewski, & W. Paprocki (Eds.), Polityka klimatyczna i jej realizacja w pierwszej połowie XXI wieku (pp. 115-135). Centrum Myśli Strategicznych.
• Ocicka, B., & Turek, J. (2021). Supply chain sustainability risk management in a digitally VUCA changing world. In A. Szelągowska, & A. Pluta-Zaremba (Eds.), The economics of sustainable transformation (pp. 167-190). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003219958.
• Palousis, L., Luong, L., & Abhary, K. (2010). Sustainability risk identification in product development. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 3(2), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397031003686900.
• Pasi, B.N., Mahajan, S.K., & Rane, S.B. (2022). Strategies for risk management in adopting Industry 4.0 concept in manufacturing industries. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2021-0057.
• Schulte, J., & Hallstedt, S.I. (2017). Challenges and preconditions to build capabilities for sustainable product design. In A. Maier, S. Škec, H. Kim, M. Kokkolaras, J. Oehmen, G. Fadel, F. Salustri, M. van der Loos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (pp. 1-9). Blekinge Institute of Technology.
• Schulte, J., Villamil, C., & Hallstedt, S.I. (2020). Strategic sustainability risk management in product development companies: key aspects and conceptual approach. Sustainability, 12(24), 10531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410531.
• Shaheen, R., Ağa, M., Rjoub, H., & Abualrub, A. (2020). Investigation of the pillars of sustainability risk management as an extension of enterprise risk management on Palestinian insurance firms' profitability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4709. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114709.
• Sutrisno, A., & Kumar, V. (2022). Supply chain sustainability risk assessment model using integration of the preference selection index (PSI) and the Shannon entropy. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2021-0191.
• Swiss Reinsurance Company. (2012). 2012 Corporate responsibility report committed to sustainable value creation. Retrieved 27.02.2022 from https://www.swissre.com/dam/jcr:7cfc9052-ea7b-4fc0-bf6e-2845a36a2d0b/2012-corporate-responsibility-report-doc-en.pdf.
• Tang, W.Y., Li, Z.M., & Tu, Y. (2018). Sustainability risk evaluation for large-scale hydropower projects with hybrid uncertainty. Sustainability, 10(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010138.
• Turek, J., & Rogowski, W., (2021). TOP 10 globalnych rodzajów ryzyka w najnowszym raporcie World Economic Forum. Retrieved 06.09.2022 from https://gazeta.sgh.waw.pl/meritum/top-10-globalnych-rodzajow-ryzyka-w-najnowszym-raporcie-world-economic-forum.
• WEF. (2021). The global risk report 2021. Retrieved 27.02.2022 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf.
• Witkowski, W. (2017). Internet of things, big data, industry 4.0: innovative solutions in logistics and supply chains management. Procedia Engineering, 182, 763-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.197.
• Xu, M., Cui, Y., Hu, M., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Liang, S., & Qu, S. (2019). Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 857-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.307.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2022.039