Volatility and Tail Dependence Between Sustainable Stock Indices During the COVID-19 Pandemic

• Autorzy: Bogna Janik , Piotr Płuciennik
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Motivation: The motivation behind the study was to analyze the risk of sustainable stock indices (SSIs) and their conventional peers during the COVID-19 health crisis. We wanted to check if SSIs were more resistant to market risk in the times of huge volatility as well as what the correlation between particular SSIs was and, similarly, between their conventional peers. Aim: The main objective of the study was to analyze volatility spillover among sustainability stock indices (SSIs) and their conventional peers during the COVID-19 health crisis. The authors analyze conditional volatility among SSIs, which was obtained from univariate GARCH-type models, and the tail dependence coefficient, which was derived from the Copula-GARCH models. The indices from FTSE4Good family for the USA, Europe and Japan markets together with their corresponding conventional indices have been chosen. Results: The research shows that during the COVID-19 health crisis SSIs were less volatile than their conventional peers. Moreover the relations between particular SSIs in most cases were weaker, whereas extreme observations which occurred were less concordant for conventional indices. It implies that the stability of sustainable stock indices from FTSE4good family is greater than for their conventional peers.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Indeks giełdowy; Inwestycje; Pandemia

EN

Stock market indexes; Investment; Pandemic

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Prawo
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 21
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 693-710

Twórcy

autor

Bogna Janik

• WSB University in Poznań, Poland

autor

Piotr Płuciennik

• Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Yang, Sh., & Zhang, Ch. (2020). Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: an analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 593-621, https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011.
• Ashwin Kumar, N.C., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P., & Tavares, R. (2016). ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: a new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(4), 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909.
• BBVA. (2022). What is a sustainability index used for. Retrieved 03.10.2022 from https://www.bbva.com/en/sustainability/what-is-a-sustainability-index-used-for.
• Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics. 31(3), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.
• Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & Mzali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(4), 1258-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.004.
• Broadstock, D.C., Chan, K., Cheng, L., & Wangb, X. (2020). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716.
• Diouf, D. (2016). Exploring factors that influence social retail investors' decisions: evidence from Desjardins Fund Dominique. Journal of Business Ethics, 134 (1), 45-67.
• Doman, M., & Doman, R. (2013). The dynamics and strength of linkages between the stock markets in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland after their EU accession. Dynamic Econometric Models, 13, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.12775/DEM.2013.001.
• Engle, R.F., & Bollerslev, T. (1986). Modelling the persistence of conditional variances. Econometric Reviews, 5(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938608800095.
• Engle, R.F., & Sheppard, K. (2001). Theoretical and empirical properties of dynamic conditional correlation MVGARCH. NBER Working Paper Series, 8554, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8554.
• FTSE Russell Research Portal. (2022). FTSE4Good index series. Retrieved 02.03.2022 from https://research.ftserussell.com/researchportal.
• Hemingway, C.A., & Maclagan, P.W. (2004). Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9.
• Jia, Y., Gao, X., & Julian, S. (2020). Do firms use corporate social responsibility to insure against stock price risk: evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management Journal, 41(2), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3107.
• Jo, H., & Harjoto M. (2014). Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm risk. Business Ethics, 23(3), 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12051.
• Junkus, J.C., & Berry, T. (2010). The demographic profile of socially responsible investors. Managerial Finance, 36(6), 474-481.
• Kabir Hassan, M., Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Paltrinieri, A., & Piserà, S. (2021). The crossroads of ESG and religious screening on firm risk. Research in International Business and Finance, 58,101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101500.
• Le, T.H., Do, H.X., Nguyen, D.K., & Sensoye, A. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and tail-dependency networks of financial assets. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101800.
• Lee, D.D., & Faff, R.W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: a global perspective. The Financial Review, 44(2), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2009.00216.x.
• Lindskog, F. (2000). Linear correlation estimation. Retrieved 06.06.2022 from http://www2.risklab.ch/ftp/papers/LinearCorrelationEstimation.pdf.
• Lueg, K., Krastev, B, & Lueg, R. (2019). Bidirectional effects between organizational sustainability disclosure and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.379.
• Maraqa, B., & Bein, M. (2020). Dynamic interrelationship and volatility spillover among sustainability stock markets, major European conventional indices, and international crude oil. Sustainability, 12(9), 3908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093908.
• McLachlan, J., & Gardner, J. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033104.28219.92.
• Morningstar. (2021). European ESG fund landscape. Retrieved 03.03.2022 from https://www.morningstar.com/content/dam/marketing/emea/uk/European_ESG_Fund_Landscape_2020.pdf.
• Muhammad, N., Scrimgeour, F., Reddy, K., & Abidin, S. (2015). The impact of corporate environmental performance on market risk: the Australian industry case. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 347-362.
• Nelson, D.B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260.
• Patton, A.J. (2002). Applications of copula theory in financial econometrics [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California.
• Patton, A.J. (2006). Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. International Economic Review, 47(2), 527-556.
• Revelli, Ch. (2017). Socially responsible investing (SRI): from mainstream to margin. Research in International Business and Finance, 39(PB), 711-717.
• Sassen, R., Hinze, A.K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86, 867-904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0819-3.
• Schmidt, R. (2002). Tail dependence for elliptically contoured distributions. Math Methods Operations Research, 55(2), 301-327.
• Shakil, M.H., Tasnia, M., Mostafiz, M.I. (2020). Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance performance of US banks: moderating role of environmental, social and corporate governance. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 661-677. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0210.
• Sherwood, M.W., & Pollard J.L. (2018). The risk-adjusted return potential of integrating ESG strategies into emerging market equities. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 8(1), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2017.1331118.
• Singh, A. (2020). COVID-19 and safer investment bets. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101729.
• US SIF. (2022). Retrieved 10.05.2022 from https://www.ussif.org.
• Verheyden, T., Eccles, R.G., & Feiner, A. (2016). ESG for all: the impact of ESG screening on return, risk, and diversification. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12174.
• Whieldon, E., Copley, M., & Clark, R. (2020). Major ESG investment funds outperforming S&P 500 during COVID-19. Retrieved 06.06.2022 from https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/major-esg-investment-funds-outperforming-s-p-500-during-covid-19-57965103.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2022.037