Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: Analysis of how the 2020 US presidential election was covered and framed by Polish television news programs, and whether the polarization of media and politics in Poland was reflected in the studied content, influencing its bias.
RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The analysis of the coverage of the US presidential campaign by three nationwide TV news programs - TVN, TVP and Polsat by using content analysis with elements of framing analysis and comparative analysis.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article consists of four parts: the first explains the methodology of the study, the second discusses how presidential elections are covered and framed and what influences the national media being interested in covering foreign events. The third part presents the results of the study, and the last contains the discussion and conclusions.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The coverage was dichotomous and there was a correlation between the political affiliation of the media and their choice of framing. The media used a combination of game, strategy and conflict framing that highlighted differences between Trump and Biden in terms of the election results and their personal attributes. We found that the electoral rivalry was portrayed as a conflict between the candidates and that the Polish media constructed "enemy" images of candidates and voters depending on their political sympathies.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The polarization of media and politics in Poland was reflected in the coverage of the US election. The broadcasters placed Polish political conflicts in the context of the US campaign. It shows that foreign events may be covered by national media through the prism of political bias. (original abstract)
RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The analysis of the coverage of the US presidential campaign by three nationwide TV news programs - TVN, TVP and Polsat by using content analysis with elements of framing analysis and comparative analysis.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article consists of four parts: the first explains the methodology of the study, the second discusses how presidential elections are covered and framed and what influences the national media being interested in covering foreign events. The third part presents the results of the study, and the last contains the discussion and conclusions.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The coverage was dichotomous and there was a correlation between the political affiliation of the media and their choice of framing. The media used a combination of game, strategy and conflict framing that highlighted differences between Trump and Biden in terms of the election results and their personal attributes. We found that the electoral rivalry was portrayed as a conflict between the candidates and that the Polish media constructed "enemy" images of candidates and voters depending on their political sympathies.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The polarization of media and politics in Poland was reflected in the coverage of the US election. The broadcasters placed Polish political conflicts in the context of the US campaign. It shows that foreign events may be covered by national media through the prism of political bias. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
105-119
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
Bibliografia
- Aalberg T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C.H. (2012.) The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162-178. DOI: 10.1177/1464884911427799.
- Bajomi-Lazar, P. (2014). Party Colonisation of the Media in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
- Binderkrantz, A.S., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2009). Policy or processes in focus? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(2), 166-185. DOI: 10.1177/1940161209333088.
- Capella, J.N., & Jamieson, K.H. (1997). The Spiral of Cynicism. The Press and Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
- DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1187-1234. DOI: 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187.
- Dobek-Ostrowska, B. (2019). Polish Media System in a Comparative Perspective. Media in Politics, Politics in Media. Berlin: Peter Lang.
- Dopierała, W., & Ossowski, S. (2018). Polityzacja audycji informacyjnych w Polsce na przykładzie "Wiadomości" TVP i "Faktów" TVN. Com.press, 2(1), 4-25. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/57674/dopierala_ossowski_polityzacja_audycji_informacyjnych_w_polsce_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
- Entman, R.M. (2010). Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame After 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415-432. DOI: 10.1080/10584600390244176.
- Fong, Y.L. & Gek Koon, J.H. (2019). The South China Sea Dispute and War/Peace Journalism: A Framing Analysis of a Malaysian Newspaper. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 7(2),17-36. DOI: 10.17646/KOME.75672.32.
- Galtung, J. (2006). Peace Journalism as an Ethical Challenge. GMJ: Mediterranean Edition, 1(2), 1-5. https://eirineftikidimosiografia.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/galtung-j-peace-journalism-as-an-ethical-challenge.pdf
- Hopmann, D.N., Van Aelst, P. & Legnante, G. (2012). Political Balance in the News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings. Journalism, 13(2), 240-257. DOI: 10.1177/1464884911427804.
- Kempf, W. (2012). Peace Journalism, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the German Press and the German Public. Bulletin du Centre de recherche francais a Jerusalem, 23, 1-14. https://journals.openedition.org/bcrfj/6788?lang=en
- Pokorna-Ignatowicz, K. (2013). Polski system medialny 1989-2011. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
- Scheufele, D.A. (2000). Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2&3), 297-316. DOI: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07.
- Seklecka, A. (2017). "Alternatywne światy", czyli różnice w relacjonowaniu wydarzeń w "Faktach" TVN i "Wiadomościach" TVP. Political Preferences, 16, 131-152. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5605687.
- Semetko, H.A. & Valkenburg, P.M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-107. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
- Shoemaker, J.P. & Reese, D.S. (1996). Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. Austin: Longman.
- Valentino, N.A., Beckmann, M.N. & Buhr, T.A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18(4), 347-367. DOI: 10.1080/10584600152647083.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171658014
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.