Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2022 | 15 | nr 4 | 146-167
Tytuł artykułu

The Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity of Women in Individualistic Versus Collectivist Country Groups: Motives, Drivers and Inhibitors

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether differences in female entrepreneurial rates are explained by inherited cultural, societal, and technological factors. Women's early-stage entrepreneurial activity in two groups of countries is examined in this study. As part of the analysis, we used data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and employed Logistic Regression, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique, and Firth logistics for rare events. Collectivist countries have higher rates of early-stage entrepreneurial activity among women, but these occur in less technologically advanced sectors. Women's primary motivation for entrepreneurship in countries with lower disposable personal income is necessity. New technology adoption rates in early-stage entrepreneurial activity are significantly higher in collectivist countries. Young women's entrepreneurial rates are slightly affected by the loneliness phenomenon. study's weaknesses are the overconfidence of interviewees in their ability to self-assess their skills, the low rate of women entrepreneurs, and the omission of essential variables due to missing data. This study tests the adage that individualistic behavior promotes entrepreneurship and examines the impact of societal variables on women's entrepreneurship, contrary to certain assumptions made in the GEM report. The study contributes to the body of knowledge regarding female entrepreneurship. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
15
Numer
Strony
146-167
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
Bibliografia
  • Acs, Z.J. et al. (2011). Introduction to special issue of Small Business Economics on female entrepreneurship in developed and developing economies, Small Business Economics, 37(4), 393-396. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9372-1.
  • Agresti, A. (2019) An introduction to categorical data analysis. Third edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons (Wiley series in probability and statistics).
  • Ahl, H. (2006). Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595-621. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x.
  • Barreto, M. et al. (2021). Loneliness around the world: Age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness, Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 110066. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110066.
  • Bastian, B.L., Sidani, Y.M. and El Amine, Y. (2018). Women entrepreneurship in the Middle East and North Africa: A review of knowledge areas and research gaps, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(1), 14-29. doi:10.1108/GM-07-2016-0141.
  • Batista, G.E.A.P.A. and Monard, M.C. (2003). An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning', Applied Artificial Intelligence, 17(5-6), 519-533. doi:10.1080/713827181.
  • Bullough, A., Renko, M. and Abdelzaher, D. (2014). Women's Business Ownership: Operating Within the Context of Institutional and In-Group Collectivism, Journal of Management, 43(7), 2037-2064.
  • Chawla, N.V. et al. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357. doi:10.1613/jair.953.
  • Chawla, N.V. et al. (2003). SMOTEBoost: Improving Prediction of the Minority Class in Boosting, in Lavrač, N. et al. (eds) Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD 2003. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 107-119. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39804-2_12.
  • Dautzenberg, K. (2012). Gender differences of business owners in technology-based firms, International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 79-98. doi:10.1108/17566261211202990.
  • Douzas, G., Bacao, F. and Last, F. (2018). Improving imbalanced learning through a heuristic oversampling method based on k-means and SMOTE, Information Sciences, 465, 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.056.
  • Drake, P. (2018). "The cut and thrust of industrial relations" - bullying by another name?, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(1), 2-13. doi:10.1108/GM-09-2016-0154.
  • Eneh Ojo, N. M., Mafimisebi, O. P., & Arndt, F. (2022). Female entrepreneurs innovativeness in digital business ecosystems. In Handbook on Digital Business Ecosystems: Strategies, Platforms, Technologies, Governance and Societal Challenges ( 143-159). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107191.00017
  • Firth, D. (1993). Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates, Biometrika, 80(1), 27-38.
  • Fluharty-Jaidee, J.T. et al. (2018). "Some people claim theres a woman to blame": Gender sentencing disparity in male-dominated professions: evidence from AICPA infraction data, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(1), 30-49. doi:10.1108/GM04-2016-0085.
  • Foss, L. et al. (2019). Women's entrepreneurship policy research: a 30-year review of the evidence, Small Business Economics, 53(2), 409-429. doi:10.1007/s11187-018-9993-8.
  • GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor) (2022). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2021/2022 Global Report: Opportunity Amid Disruption. London: GEM.
  • Godwin, L.N., Stevens, C.E. and Brenner, N.L. (2006) Forced to Play by the Rules? Theorising how Mixed-Sex Founding Teams Benefit Women Entrepreneurs in Male-Dominated Contexts, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 623-642. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00139.x.
  • Hartigan, J. O. H. N. (1964). Invariant prior distributions. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 836-845.
  • Hartog, J., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. and Jonker, N. (2002) Linking Measured Risk Aversion to Individual Characteristics, Kyklos, 55(1), 3-26. doi:10.1111/1467-6435.00175.
  • Hattab, H. (2012) Towards understanding female entrepreneurship in Middle Eastern and North African countries: A cross-country comparison of female entrepreneurship, Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5(3), 171-186. doi:10.1108/17537981211265561.
  • Heu, L.C., van Zomeren, M. and Hansen, N. (2019) Lonely Alone or Lonely Together? A Cultural-Psychological Examination of Individualism-Collectivism and Loneliness in Five European Countries, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 780-793. doi:10.1177/0146167218796793.
  • Hofstede, G. (2011) Dimensionalising Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
  • Hofstede, G. and Minkov, M. (2010) Long- versus short-term orientation: new perspectives, Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493-504. doi:10.1080/13602381003637609.
  • King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political analysis, 9(2), 137-163.
  • Kirkwood, J. (2009). Motivational factors in a push-pull theory of entrepreneurship, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 346-364. doi:10.1108/17542410910968805.
  • Klyver, K., Nielsen, S.L. and Evald, M.R. (2013). Women's self-employment: An act of institutional (dis)integration? A multilevel, cross-country study, Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 474-488. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.07.002.
  • Kumar, M. et al. (2018). Gender and organisational climate: A study of two structurally different large organisations in India, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(3), 217-233. doi:10.1108/GM-11-2015-0092.
  • Lerner, M., Brush, C. and Hisrich, R. (1997). Israeli women entrepreneurs: An examination of factors affecting performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 12(4), 315-339. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00061-4.
  • Li, Y. et al. (2021). Gendered institutions and female entrepreneurship: a fuzzy-set QCA approach, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 36(1), 87-107. doi:10.1108/GM-07-2019-0110.
  • Little, R.J.A. (1988). A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.
  • Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Loscocco, K. and Bird, S.R. (2012). Gendered Paths: Why Women Lag Behind Men in Small Business Success, Work and Occupations, 39(2), 183-219. doi:10.1177/0730888412444282.
  • Luengo, J. et al. (2011). Addressing data complexity for imbalanced data sets: analysis of SMOTE-based oversampling and evolutionary undersampling, Soft Computing, 15(10), 1909-1936. doi:10.1007/s00500-010-0625-8.
  • Malach Pines, A., Lerner, M. and Schwartz, D. (2010) Gender differences in entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal. Edited by J. Syed, 29(2), 186-198. doi:10.1108/02610151011024493.
  • Martínez-Rodríguez, I., Quintana-Rojo, C., Gento, P., & Callejas-Albiñana, F.-E. (2022). Public policy recommendations for promoting female entrepreneurship in Europe. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(3), 1235-1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00751-9
  • Minkov, M. et al. (2017) A revision of Hofstede's individualism-collectivism dimension: A new national index from a 56-country study, Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3), 386-404. doi:10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0197.
  • Panda, S. (2018) Constraints faced by women entrepreneurs in developing countries: review and ranking, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(4), 315-331. doi:10.1108/GM-01-2017-0003.
  • Pinillos, M.-J. and Reyes, L. (2011) Relationship between individualist-collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data, Small Business Economics, 37(1), 23-37. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9230-6.
  • Puhr, R. et al. (2017) Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?: R. PUHR ET AL., Statistics in Medicine [Preprint]. doi:10.1002/sim.7273.
  • Rainey, C. and McCaskey, K. (2021) Estimating logit models with small samples, Political Science Research and Methods, 9(3), 549-564. doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.9.
  • Quak, E., & Barenboim, I. (2022). Female Entrepreneurship and Informality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: What Have We Learned So Far? https://doi.org/10.19088/MUVA.2022.001
  • Rubio-Bañón, A. and Esteban-Lloret, N. (2016). Cultural factors and gender role in female entrepreneurship, Suma de Negocios, 7(15), 9-17. doi:10.1016/j.sumneg.2015.12.002.
  • Shepherd, D. and Haynie, J.M. (2009). Birds of a feather don't always flock together: Identity management in entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 316-337. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.10.005.
  • Socratous, M. (2018). Networking: a male dominated game, Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(2), 167-183. doi:10.1108/GM-11-2016-0181.
  • Stam, E. and Stel, A. van (2011). Types of Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, in Szirmai, A., Naudé, W., and Goedhuys, M. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Development. Oxford University Press, 78-95. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596515.003.0004.
  • Thébaud, S. (2015). Business as Plan B: Institutional Foundations of Gender Inequality in Entrepreneurship across 24 Industrialised Countries, Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 671-711. doi:10.1177/0001839215591627.
  • Thomas, A.S. and Mueller, S.L. (2000). A Case for Comparative Entrepreneurship: Assessing the Relevance of Culture, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287-301.
  • Yadav, V., Unni, J., Naik, R., & Dutta, S. (2022). Gender Differentials in Entrepreneurship: Insights from a Multi-method Study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 31(1), 30-64. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557211069283
  • Zahra, S.A. (2002) Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualisation, and Extension, 20.
  • Zolin, R., Stuetzer, M. and Watson, J. (2013). Challenging the female underperformance hypothesis, International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 116-129. doi:10.1108/17566261311328819.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171657582
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.