An Evaluation of Circular Economy Development in the Baltic States

• Autorzy: Ugnius Jakubelskas , Viktorija Skvarciany
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: The fact that all resources are not infinite and the needs of society are steadily increasing, new ways of producing, consuming and waste disposal should be adopted. A circular economy as a modern alternative to a linear economy became one of the priorities of the European Union in order to create a modern, resource-efficient and competitive system. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to present the concept of a circular economy and the justification of its implementation based on a literature review. The article focuses on determining the factors of a circular economy and evaluating its importance in the Baltic States. In other words, the main aim of the article is to highlight the factors of a circular economy and assess its significance. Research methodology: A panel regression analysis was used in order to evaluate which indicator of the selected circular economy factors is the most important. Results: The survey reveals that waste electrical and electronic equipment has the most significant potential for increased circular material use rate in the Baltic States. All electrical and electronic equipment should be designed so that it would be possible to repair and reuse it to extend the product life cycle and reduce the carbon footprint. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in conjunction with increasing the usage of renewable energy could increase resource productivity and domestic material consumption (DMC) and ensure Baltic States' independence in the energy sector through offshore wind farms that have the region's most considerable potential. Novelty: There is a lack of studies conducted in the Baltic States focused on circular economy development using panel data. Most of the previous studies were focused on the European Union as a whole or individual countries. This study presents a deeper analysis of circular economy development in the Baltic States. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Gospodarka zamkniętego obiegu; Rozwój zrównoważony

EN

Circular economy; Sustainable development

• Czasopismo: Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: vol. 22, iss. 2
• Strony: 193-208

Twórcy

autor

Ugnius Jakubelskas

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

autor

Viktorija Skvarciany

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• Afteni, C., Păunoiu, V., Afteni, M. (2022). Study on the Transition from the Linear Economy to the Circular Economy. Annals of "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Fascicle V, Technologies in machine building, 39 (1), 49-55. DOI: 10.35219/tmb.2021.1.08.
• Alhawari, O., Awan, U., Bhutta, M.K.S., Ülkü, M.A. (2021). Insights from Circular Economy Literature: A Review of Extant Definitions and Unravelling Paths to Future Research. Sustainability, 13 (2), 859. DOI: 10.3390/su13020859.
• Bildirici, M., Özaksoy, F. (2018). An analysis of biomass consumption and economic growth in transition countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31 (1), 386-405. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1427610.
• Changwichan, K., Gheewala, S.H. (2020). Choice of materials for takeaway beverage cups towards a circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 34-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.02.004.
• Cole, C., Gnanapragasam, A., Cooper, T. (2017). Towards a Circular Economy: Exploring Routes to Reuse for Discarded Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Procedia CIRP, 61, 155-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.234.
• European Commission (2019). A Europe fit for the digital age. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age_en.
• European Commission (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe.
• Eurostat (2021). Circular economy - Overview. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy.
• Fořt, J., Černý, R. (2020). Transition to circular economy in the construction industry: Environmental aspects of waste brick recycling scenarios. Waste Management, 118, 510-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.004.
• Fratini, C.F., Georg, S., Jørgensen, M.S. (2019). Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: A research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 974-989. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193.
• Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J. (2017). The Circular Economy - A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
• Grdic, Z.S., Nizic, M.K., Rudan, E. (2020). Circular economy concept in the context of economic development in EU countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (7). DOI: 10.3390/su12073060.
• Jusel, T., Burinskienė, A. (2019). Perėjimas prie žiedinės ekonomikos: Stabdančių ir skatinančių veiksnių sąveika mikro-, mezo- ir makrolygmenimis/Transition to circular economy: Barriers and drivers interaction at micro, meso and macro levels. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis, 11, 1-12. DOI: 10.3846/mla.2019.9633.
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
• Kristensen, H.S., Mosgaard, M.A. (2020). A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy - moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118531. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118531.
• Marčiukaitis, M., Dzenajavičienė, E.F., Kveselis, V., Savickas, J., Perednis, E., Lisauskas, A., Markevičius, A., Marcinauskas, K., Gecevičius, G., Erlickytė-Marčiukaitienė, R. (2016). Atsinaujinančių energijos išteklių naudojimo Lietuvoje patirtis, reikšmė ir siekiai. Energetika, 62 (4). DOI: 10.6001/energetika.v62i4.3394.
• Meath, C., Karlovšek, J., Navarrete, C., Eales, M., Hastings, P. (2022). Co-designing a multilevel platform for industry level transition to circular economy principles: A case study of the infrastructure CoLab. Journal of Cleaner Production, 347, 131080. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131080.
• Mihai, F.-C., Gnoni, M.-G., Meidiana, C., Ezeah, C., Elia, V. (2019). Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): Flows, Quantities, and Management - A Global Scenario. In: Electronic Waste Management and Treatment Technology (pp. 1-34). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816190-6.00001-7.
• Mihai, F.-C., Minea, I. (2021). Sustainable Alternative Routes versus Linear Economy and Resources Degradation in Eastern Romania. Sustainability, 13 (19), 10574. DOI: 10.3390/su131910574.
• Miskinis, V., Galinis, A., Konstantinaviciute, I., Lekavicius, V., Neniskis, E. (2019). Comparative Analysis of the Energy Sector Development Trends and Forecast of Final Energy Demand in the Baltic States. Sustainability, 11 (2), 521. DOI: 10.3390/su11020521.
• Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553.
• Narayan, R., Tidström, A. (2020). Tokenising coopetition in a blockchain for a transition to circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121437. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121437.
• Naser, H. (2015). Analysing the long-run relationship among oil market, nuclear energy consumption, and economic growth: An evidence from emerging economies. Energy, 89, 421-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.115.
• Nuñez-Cacho, P., Górecki, J., Molina-Moreno, V., Corpas-Iglesias, F. (2018). What Gets Mea****sured, Gets Done: Development of a Circular Economy Measurement Scale for Building Industry. Sustainability, 10 (7), 2340. DOI: 10.3390/su10072340.
• Patwa, N., Sivarajah, U., Seetharaman, A., Sarkar, S., Maiti, K., Hingorani, K. (2021). Towards a circular economy: An emerging economies context. Journal of Business Research, 122, 725-735. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.015.
• Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20 (3), 597-625. DOI: 10.1017/S0266466604203073.
• Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224.
• Saglam, Y., Ampountolas, A. (2021). The effects of shocks on Turkish tourism demand: Evidence using panel unit root test. Tourism Economics, 27 (4), 859-866. DOI: 10.1177/1354816619899831.
• Sánchez Levoso, A., Gasol, C.M., Martínez-Blanco, J., Durany, X.G., Lehmann, M., Gaya, R.F. (2020). Methodological framework for the implementation of circular economy in urban systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119227. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119227.
• Sariatli, F. (2017). Linear Economy Versus Circular Economy: A Comparative and Analyzer Study for Optimisation of Economy for Sustainability. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6 (1), 31-34. DOI: 10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005.
• Škrinjarić, T. (2020). Empirical assessment of the circular economy of selected European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120246.
• Šostko, A., Jakubavičius, A. (2018). Gamybos logistikos tobulinimas bioekonomikos iššūkių kontekste. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis, 10, 1-7. DOI: 10.3846/mla.2018.2864.
• Werning, J.P., Spinler, S. (2020). Transition to circular economy on firm level: Barrier identification and prioritisation along the value chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118609. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118609.
• Zuo, J., Arbor, A. (1997). Identifying the Order ofIntegration of Time-series Data Using Customised SAS Macros: Dickey-FuUer and Augmented Dickey-FuUer Tests. SESUG, 414-419.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/foli-2022-0026