Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility in Companies' Practices : an Empirical Analysis

• Autorzy: Łukasz Małys
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: Despite conceptual differences, sustainable development and corporate social responsibility both refer to environmental and social aspects. There needs to be an agreement on how to recognise their differences in the practice of companies' operations.
Research objectives: The study aims to verify whether there are differences in the involvement in environmental and social practices between companies declaring a commitment to sustainable development and corporate social responsibility.
Research design and methods: The data were obtained using the CATI technique and a standardised survey questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was carried out to verify the differences.
Results: Companies referring to the concept of corporate social responsibility implement more social practices compared to companies that refer to the idea of sustainable development. There are no differences in the implementation of environmental practices.
Conclusions: In business practice, corporate social responsibility seems to be a broader concept than sustainable development, as it puts more attention on social aspects. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Społeczna nieodpowiedzialność biznesu; Analiza empiryczna

EN

Sustainable development; Corporate Social Irresponsibility (CSI); Empirical analysis

• Czasopismo: Social Entrepreneurship Review (SER)
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 1
• Strony: 63-72

Twórcy

autor

Łukasz Małys

• Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland

Bibliografia

• Ashton, W., Russell, S., & Futch, E. (2017). The adoption of green business practices among small US Midwestern manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 60 (12), 2133 -2149.
• Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., & Chidzero, B. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future .
• Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review , 32 ( 3 ) , 9 4 6 - 9 6 7.
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons , 34 (4), 39-48.
• Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 38 (5), 360-387. https://doi. org/10.1108/0960 0 030810882816.
• Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J., & Martinkus, B. (2009). The concept of sustainable development and its use for sustainability scenarios. Engineering Economics , 62 (2).
• Dhingra, D., & Mittal, R. (2014). CSR practices in Indian banking sector. Global Journal of Finance and Management , 6 (9), 853-862.
• Diabat, A., Khodaverdi, R., & Olfat, L. (2013). An exploration of green supply chain practices and performances in an automotive industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 68 (1), 9 49 - 9 61.
• Ebner, D., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2006). The relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Responsibility Research Conference , 4 (5.9), 2006.
• Eklington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st century . New Society Publishers.
• Elliott, J. A. (2013). An Introduction to Sustainable Development (4th ed.). Routledge.
• Filek, J. (2013). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu jako nowa wersja umowy społecznej . Księgarnia Akademicka.
• Golicic, S. L., & Smith, C. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management , 49 (2), 78-95.
• Gudic, M., Tan, T. K., & Flynn, P. M. (2020). Beyond the Bottom Line: Integrating Sustainability Into Business and Management Practice . Routledge.
• Guerrero-Villegas, J., Sierra-García, L., & Palacios-Florencio, B. (2018). The role of sustainable development and innovation on firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 25 (6), 1350 -13 62 .
• Halati, A., & He, Y. (2018). Intersection of economic and environmental goals of sustainable development initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production , 189 , 813 - 829.
• Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics , 14 0 (1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijpe.2012.01.0 42.
• Houy, C., Reiter, M., Fettke, P., Loos, P., Hoesch-Klohe, K., & Ghose, A. (2012). Advancing business process technology for humanity: Opportunities and challenges of green BPM for sustainable business activities. In J. vom Brocke, S. Seidel, & J. Recker (Eds.), Green Business Process Management (pp. 75-92). Springer.
• Lamberti, L., & Lettieri, E. (2009). CSR practices and corporate strategy: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics , 87 (2), 153-168.
• Lin, B., Jones, C. A., & Hsieh, C. (2001). Environmental practices and assessment: a process perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems .
• Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2015). Relationship between sustainable development and financial performance: international empirical research. Business Strategy and the Environment , 24 (1), 20 -39.
• Misani, N. (2010). The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Management Research Review , 33 (7 ), 73 4 -74 8.
• Morali, O., & Searcy, C. (2013). A review of sustainable supply chain management practices in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics , 117 (3), 635-658.
• Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Murphy, P. E. (2013). CSR practices and consumer perceptions. Journal of Business Research , 66 (10), 1839 -1851.
• Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal , 37 (8), 1615-1631.
• Padin, C., Ferro, C., Svensson, G., Høgevold, N. M., Varela, J. C. S., & Wagner, B. (2017). Validating the influence of stakeholders and sources when implementing business sustainability practices. International Journal of Procurement Management , 10 (2), 248 -265.
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review , 80 (12), 56-68.
• Seidel, S., Recker, J., Pimmer, C., & Brocke, J. vom. (2010). Enablers and barriers to the organizational adoption of sustainable business practices. In C. Beath (Ed.), roceeding of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems: Sustainable IT Collaboration around the Globe. Association for Information Systems (pp. 1-10). Associa - tion for Information Systems.
• Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management-a Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment , 17 (8), 455-466.
• Spiller, R. (2000). Ethical business and investment: A model for business and society. Journal of Business Ethics , 27 (1), 149 -16 0 .
• Tomislav, K. (2018). The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business , 21 (1), 67- 9 4.
• Vachon, S. (2007). Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. International Journal of Production Research , 45 (18-19), 4357-4379.
• Yunus, E. N., & Michalisin, M. D. (2016). Sustained competitive advantage through green supply chain manage - ment practices: a natural-resource-based view approach. International Journal of Services and Operations Management , 25 (2), 135 .

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15678/SER.2022.1.05