Impact Analysis of Peer-to-peer Fintech in Vietnam's Banking Industry

• Autorzy: Nguyen Thi Ngoc Diep , Tran Quang Canh
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper aims to analyze the factors affecting customer satisfaction and loyalty when using peer-to-peer (P2P) services, thereby drawing some conclusions for the banking industry. The second objective is to determine whether P2P Fintech and traditional banks should collaborate under current circumstances or if they make for healthy competition, and collaboration is optional. The SEM model, IBM SPSS Statistics 20, and IBM SPSS Amos software are used to process data from an official survey of 254 people who have used P2P Fintech from January 5 to February 23, 2022. The results show that P2P Fintech provides products with a better customer experience, and there is a change in customer payment trends. Therefore, bank managers should create appropriate policies for the sustainable development of their banks that would involve establishing their P2P activity and ensuring their customers' satisfaction. Commercial banks need to clarify their responsibilities with service providers and clearly define the data provided to Fintech in order to avoid unintended cases: legal risk that service providers are prohibited or prevented from functioning; potential capital loss or payment delay, ... Moreover, there are risks when using a P2P fintech system, such as technology development, or when the software is discontinued, the level of risk will be very high. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Technologie finansowe; Sektor bankowy; Usługi finansowe; Satysfakcja klienta

EN

FinTech; Banking sector; Financial services; Customer satisfaction

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 15
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 173-185

Twórcy

autor

Nguyen Thi Ngoc Diep

• Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

autor

Tran Quang Canh

• Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Finance, Viet Nam

Bibliografia

• Abbad, M. M. (2013). E-banking in Jordan. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(7), 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.586725
• Ahmed, L. R., & Sulaiman, J. (2018). Advancements in the Banking Industry.
• Alt, R., Beck, R., & Smits, M. T. (2018). FinTech and the transformation of the financial industry. In Electronic markets, 28(3), 235-243. Springer.
• Bunea, S., Kogan, B., & Stolin, D. (2016). Banks Versus FinTech: At Last, it's Official. Journal of Financial Transformation, 44, 122-131.
• Das, S. R. (2019). The future of fintech. Financial Management, 48(4), 981-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12297
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 301-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
• Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537-580.
• Haering, M. (n.d.). If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them-How Banks, Fintech And Tech Players Can Win Together. Forbes Communications Council. Retrieved 27 September 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescommunicationscouncil/2018/04/05/if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them-how-banks-fintech-and-tech-players-can-win-together/?sh=7217f4545ce1
• Hair, J. F., Ortinau, D. J., & Harrison, D. E. (2010). Essentials of marketing research (Vol. 2). McGraw-Hill/Irwin New York, NY.
• Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(1), 82-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903439003
• Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003
• Leibniz, G. (2016). Report on implementation Equality standards. Publisher Leibniz community. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=vi&as_sdt=0,5&q=Leibniz-Gemeinschaft+(2016).+Empfehlungen+zu+Standards+für+die+Arbeit+von+Gleich- +stellungsbeauftragten+in+Leibniz-Einrichtungen.+Arbeitskreis+Chancengleichheit+der+Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.&btnG=
• Li, Y., Spigt, R., & Swinkels, L. (2017). The impact of FinTech start-ups on incumbent retail banks' share prices. Financial Innovation, 3(1), 1-16.
• Markey, R., & Reichheld, F. (2011). Introducing the net promoter system. Retrieved November, 27, 2017.
• Romānova, I., & Kudinska, M. (2016). Banking and Fintech: A challenge or opportunity? Contemporary Issues in Finance: Current Challenges from across Europe, 98. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920160000098002
• Ryu, H.-S. (2018). Understanding benefit and risk framework of fintech adoption: Comparison of early adopters and late adopters. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50374
• Shim, Y., & Shin, D.-H. (2016). Analyzing China's fintech industry from the perspective of actor-network theory. Telecommunications Policy, 40(2-3), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.11.005
• Siek, M., & Sutanto, A. (2019). Impact analysis of fintech on banking industry. 2019 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 1, 356-361. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2019.8843778.
• State Bank of Vietnam. (2019). Official Letter 5228/NHNN-CSTT 2019 Peer -peer lending activities. State Bank of Vietnam. https://vanbanphapluat.co/cong-van-5228-nhnn-cstt-2019-hoat-dong-cho-vay-ngang-hang
• Suryanto, T. (2016). Dividend Policy, Information Technology, Accounting Reporting to Investor Reaction And Fraud Prevention. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 138-150.
• Szopiński, T. S. (2016). Factors affecting the adoption of online banking in Poland. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4763-4768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.027
• Tran, T. A., Han, K. S., & Yun, S. Y. (2018). Factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment service using fintech systems: Focused on Vietnam. Asia Life Sciences, 3, 1731-1747.
• Vives, X. (2017). The impact of FinTech on banking. European Economy, 2, 97-105.
• Vovchenko, N. G., Tishchenko, E. N., Epifanova, T. V., & Gontmacher, M. B. (2017). Electronic currency: The potential risks to national security and methods to minimize them.
• Yao, T., & Song, L. (2021). Examining the differences in the impact of Fintech on the economic capital of commercial banks' market risk: Evidence from a panel system GMM analysis. Applied Economics, 53(23), 2647-2660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1864275
• Zalan, T., & Toufaily, E. (2017). The promise of fintech in emerging markets: Not as disruptive. Contemporary Economics, 11(4), 415-431.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-3/12