Exploring Potential Drivers of Innovation-related Activities in Poland : Evidence from Polish Business Clusters

• Autorzy: Joanna Kuczewska , Tomasz Tomaszewski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: Innovations are introduced by competitive companies. One of the most common methods, increasingly used by companies, is organizing clusters or cluster initiatives operating within a specialized sector, competing with each other, exploiting the potential of cooperation and its impact on creating new business ideas. However, these efforts could be unviable due to the lack of an effective leader of the group. One should underline a crucial role of the leader in such an organized network, since the leader makes improvements and takes initiatives for all the network and its partners. These concepts prompt us to undertake the research on the role of clusters' characteristics on enhancing willingness to innovate in general. This study aims to point out the main characteristics of clusters and to investigate their impact on companies' innovativeness. The main problem to address is the magnitude of specific effects that might boost introducing new solutions in firms' networks.
Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of factors describing cluster environment (characteristics like cooperation within clusters and beyond them, incentives of a leader, and localization factors) that might affect the innovativeness of companies.
Methods: The authors collected data using questionnaire. This type of primary source enables the authors to construct a model consisting of latent variables such as incentives of coordinator of cluster or cluster initiative, cooperation of firms with local authorities, cooperation between entrepreneurs, or localization. The results are subject to the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analysis.
Findings & value added: The conducted analysis leads to several findings. Firstly, incentives provided by the cluster coordinator enable companies to increase the willingness to introduce innovations in general. Secondly, however, the influence of other cluster characteristics on the propensity to innovate for firms functioning within specific Polish business clusters is scant. These findings point to the fact that actions leading to assign the official coordinator of a cluster need to be done, as it should result in better flow of knowledge, more symmetric information among companies within cluster, and more productive and innovative way of functioning firms in general. Regarding innovation clusters (and regional innovation systems), these actions need to be supported by forming policy on regional level, because effective clusters would induce more competitive regional economy in long-term scenario. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Klastry; Współpraca; Innowacyjność; Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw

EN

Business cluster; Cooperation; Innovative character; Enterprise innovation

• Czasopismo: Equilibrium
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 17
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 775-801

Twórcy

autor

Joanna Kuczewska

• University of Gdansk, Poland

autor

Tomasz Tomaszewski

• University of Gdansk, Poland

Bibliografia

• Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678-690.
• Aghion, P., Ljungqvist, L., Howitt, P., Howitt, P. W., Brant-Collett, M., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. MIT press.
• Alberti, F. G., Belfanti, F., & Giusti, J. D. (2021). Knowledge exchange and innovation in clusters: a dynamic social network analysis. Industry and Innovation, 28(7), 880-901. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1904840.
• Andersson, T., Schwaag Serger, S., Sörvik, J., & Wise Hansson, E. (2004). The cluster policies whitebook. Malmö: IKED.
• Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173. doi: 10.2307/2295952.
• Asheim, B. T., Coenen, L., & Svensson-Henning, M. (2003). Nordic SMEs and regional innovation systems. Lund: Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University.
• Audretsch, D., & Feldman M. P. (1995). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
• Baptista, R. (2000). Does innovation diffuse faster within geographical cluster? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 515-535. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00045-4.
• Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525-540. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1.
• Beaudry, V., & Breschi, S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4), 325-342. doi: 10.1080/10438590290020197.
• Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287-295. doi: 10.1002/smj.448
• Benneworth, P., & Charles, D. (2001). Bridging cluster theory and practice: learning from the cluster policy cycle. In P. den Hertog, E. M. Bergman & D. Charles (Eds.). Innovative clusters: drivers of national innovation systems systems (pp. 389-403). Paris: OECD.
• Blanco-Oliver, A., Irimia-Dieguez, A., Oliver-Alfonso, M. D., & Vázquez-Cueto, M.J. (2016). Hybrid model using logit and nonparametric methods for predicting micro-entity failure. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(3), 35-46. doi: 10.21511/imfi.13(3).2016.037-346.
• Bogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2010). Innovation and employment: a reinvestigation using revised Pavitt classes. Research Policy, 39(6), 799-809. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.017.
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887.
• Boschma, R., & Ter Wal, A. (2007). Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: the case of a footwear district in the south of Italy. Industry & Innovation, 14, 177-199. doi: 10.1080/13662710701253441.
• Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2, 93-118. doi: 10.1007/BF01224915.
• Cassel, C., Hackl, P., & Westlund, A.H. (1999). Robustness of partial least squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures, Journal of Applied Statistics, 26(4), 435-446. doi: 10.1080/02664769922322.
• Cheba, K. (2015). The influence of clusters on economic development. A comparative analysis of cluster policy in the European Union and Japan. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(3), 73-88. doi: 10. 12775/OeC.2015.022.
• Cheng, Y., Liu, Y., Fan, W., Yan, Z., & Ye, X. (2017). Triple helix on globalization: a case study of the China International Nanotech Innovation Cluster. Information Development, 35(2), 272-289. doi: 10.1177/0266666917743050.
• Chun-Liang, C., Yao-Chin L., Wei-Hung, C., & Xin-Si, H., (2018). Determinants of cluster leadership and identification on cluster innovation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(4), 538-553. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-10-2017-0305.
• Ciccione, A., & Matsuyama, K. (1996). Start-up costs and pecuniary externalities as barriers to economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 33-59. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00052-6.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00025-5
• Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C., & MacNeill, S. (2010). Platforms of innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi: 10.4337/9781849806572
• Corral de Zubielqui, G., Lindsay, N., & Lindsay, W. (2019). Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 53, 145-164. doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0046-0.
• Duranton, G., Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011). The economics of clusters: lessons from the French experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592203.001.0001.
• Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115. doi: 10.1108/13673270510602809.
• Eisenbeiß, S. A., & Boerner, S. (2010). Transformational leadership and R&D innovation: taking a curvilinear approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 364-372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.0056.
• Elenkov, D., Judge, W., & Wright, P. (2005). Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi-cluster comparative study. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 665-682. doi: 10.1002/smj.469.
• Engel, J. S. (2015). Global clusters of innovation: lessons from silicon valley. California Management Review, 57(2), 36-65. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.36.
• Evangelista, R., & Vezzani, A. (2011). The impact of technological and organizational innovations on employment in European firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4), 871-899. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr069.
• Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003
• Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110-132. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1.
• Götz, M., & Jankowska, B. (2017). Clusters and Industry 4.0 - do they fit together? European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1633-1653. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1327037.
• Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T.M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSs-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organisations. London: Blackwell Publishing.
• Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565-580. doi: 10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1.
• Jankowska, B., & Götz, M. (2018). Does innovation trigger the internationalisation of clusters?: the case of Polish boiler-making cluster. In F. Belussi & J. L. Hervas-Oliver (Eds.). Agglomeration and firm performance. Advances in spatial science (pp. 47-62). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-90575-4_4.
• Kaufmann, L., & Gaeckler, J. (2015). A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21, 259-272. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.005.
• Kurzhals, C, Graf-Vlachy, L, & König, A. (2020). Strategic leadership and technological innovation: a comprehensive review and research agenda Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28, 437-464. doi: 10.1111/corg.12351.
• Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-499. doi: 10.1086/261763.
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
• MacNeill, S., & Steiner, M. (2010). Leadership of cluster policy: lessons from the austrian province of styria. Policy Studies, 31(4), 441-455. doi: 10.1080/01442871003723374.
• Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1.
• Marquis, D., & Myers, S. (1969). Successful industrial innovation. Washington: National Science Fundation.
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
• Mazzoni, F. (2020). Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster. Insights into Regional Development, 2(3), 661-676. doi: 10.9770/IRD.2020.2.3(4).
• Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in technology: innovations overcome the depression. Cambridge: Ballinger.
• Müller-Seitz, G. (2012). Leadership in interorganizational networks: a literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 428-443. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00324.x.
• Necoechea-Mondragón, H., Pineda-Domínguez, D., Pérez-Reveles, L., & Soto-Flores, R. (2017). Critical factors for participation in global innovation networks. Empirical evidence from the Mexican nanotechnology sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 293-312. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.027.
• Njøs, R., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016). Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 146-169. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094.
• Nobre, F. S., Walker, D., & Harris, R. (2011). Technological, managerial and organizational core competencies: dynamic innovation and sustainable development. IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
• Niosi, J. (2012). Innovation and development through imitation (in praise of imitation). Presented to the meeting of the International Schumpeter Society. Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285716021_Innovation_and_development_through_imitation_in_praise_of_imitation.
• OECD (2005). Oslo manual. guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Oslo: OECD. doi: 10.1787/9789264013100-en.
• Pagès, J., & Tenenhaus, M., (2001). Multiple factor analysis combined with pls path modelling. Application to the analysis of relationships between physicochemical variables, sensory profiles and hedonic judgements. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 58, 261-273. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00165-4.
• Pan, X., Song, M. L., Zhang, J., & Zhou, G. (2018). Innovation network, technological learning and innovation performance of high-tech cluster enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1729-1746. doi: 10.1108/jkm-06-2018-0371.
• Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2009). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609-623. doi: 10.1002/job.650.
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.
• Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
• Pouwels, I., & Koster, F. (2017). Inter-organizational cooperation and organizational innovativeness. A comparative study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(2), 184-204. doi: 10.1108/IJIS-01-2017-0003.
• Pucci, T., Brumana, M., & Minola, T. (2020). Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: the role of proximity and family involvement. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 205-227. doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9591-y
• Radicic, D., Douglas, D., Pugh, G., & Jackson, I. (2018). Cooperation for innovation and its impact on technological and non-technological innovations: empirical evidence for European SMEs in traditional manufacturing industries. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(5), 1-41. doi: 10.1142/s1363919619500464.
• Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001.
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com.
• Rodriges-Clare, A. (1996). The division of labour and economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 3-32. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00051-8.
• Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611940.
• Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2003). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In Handbook of urban and regional economics, vol. 4 (pp. 2119-2171). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair Jr, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002.
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531-554. doi: 10.1177/1354816618823921.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1951). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Silvestre, B. S., & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244.
• Stock, R. M., Totzauer, F., & Zacharias, N. A. (2013). A closer look at crossfunctional R&D cooperation for innovativeness: innovation-oriented leadership and human resource practices as driving forces. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 924-938. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12132.
• Stojčić, N., Anić, I-D., & Aralica, Z., (2019). Do firms in clusters perform better? Lessons from wood-processing industries in new EU member states. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102043.
• Sullivan, H., Williams, P., & Jeffares, S. (2012). Leadership for collaboration. Public Management Review, 14(1), 41-66. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.589617.
• Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128-154. doi: 10.1108/14601061011040221.
• Weber, A. (1909). Theory of the location of industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Yıldız, S., Baştürk, F., & Boz, İ. T. (2014). The effect of leadership and innovativeness on business performance. Procedia - Social and Behavior-al Sciences, 150, 785-793. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.064.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24136/eq.2022.027