Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Research background: According to classical labor economics, wage differences among regions of a country that has free-factor mobility should eventually vanish. However, the level of wage inequality among Mexican territories is increasing. The nature and causes of this discrepancy are worth identifying.
Purpose of the article: To identify the spatial relationship of wage inequality that existed in the Mexican metropolitan system during the years 2010 and 2015.
Methods: We develop a model of wages that considers the interaction between spatial units within a region. Then, we specify a spatial autoregressive model with the average wage per municipality as a dependent variable. This variable is spatially lagged along with other controls such as productivity, schooling, and migration. We combine data from population and economic censuses. Then, we perform a quantile regression to estimate the spatial effect of wage in a region upon quartiles of the wage distribution.
Findings & value added: Wage inequality increases within a given region when the average wage increases in one of said region's municipalities. This phenomenon occurs because in municipalities that are neighbors of the one that enjoys a wage increase, the average wage tends to decrease. The impact is larger in those municipalities whose average wage is in the lower range of the regional wage distribution. Wage inequality is also increased by internal migration and increased productivity. These latter findings are some of the first for Mexico at this aggregation level. A novel aspect of our study is its use of territory as an observation unit for which statistics from population and economic censuses are combined to draw inferences about spatial inequality. (original abstract)
Purpose of the article: To identify the spatial relationship of wage inequality that existed in the Mexican metropolitan system during the years 2010 and 2015.
Methods: We develop a model of wages that considers the interaction between spatial units within a region. Then, we specify a spatial autoregressive model with the average wage per municipality as a dependent variable. This variable is spatially lagged along with other controls such as productivity, schooling, and migration. We combine data from population and economic censuses. Then, we perform a quantile regression to estimate the spatial effect of wage in a region upon quartiles of the wage distribution.
Findings & value added: Wage inequality increases within a given region when the average wage increases in one of said region's municipalities. This phenomenon occurs because in municipalities that are neighbors of the one that enjoys a wage increase, the average wage tends to decrease. The impact is larger in those municipalities whose average wage is in the lower range of the regional wage distribution. Wage inequality is also increased by internal migration and increased productivity. These latter findings are some of the first for Mexico at this aggregation level. A novel aspect of our study is its use of territory as an observation unit for which statistics from population and economic censuses are combined to draw inferences about spatial inequality. (original abstract)
Twórcy
autor
- Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Mexico
- Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Mexico
Bibliografia
- Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010). Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. NBER Working Paper Series, 16082. doi: 10.3386/w16082.
- Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2002). The political economy of the Kuznets curve. Review of Development Economics, 6(2), 183-203. doi: 10.1111/1467-9361.00149.
- Aguilera, A., & Castro, D. (2018). NAFTA and wage inequality in Mexico: an analysis for border cities, 1992-2016. Frontera Norte, 30(60), 85-110. doi: 10.17428/rfn.v30i60.1363.
- Andrés-Rosales, R., Czarnecki, L., & Mendoza-González, M. Á. (2019). A spatial analysis of precariousness and the gender wage gap in Mexico, 2005-2018. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 6(1), 13. doi: 10.1186/s40711-019-0104-2.
- Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244-263. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6.
- Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2009a). Inequality and specialization: the growth of lowskill service jobs in the United States. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 4290.
- Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2009b). The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. NBER Working Paper Series, 15150. doi: 10.3386/w15150.
- Baylis, K., Garduño-Rivera, R., & Piras, G. (2012). The distributional effects of NAFTA in Mexico: evidence from a panel of municipalities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1-2), 286-302. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.09.006.
- Card, D., & DiNardo, J. E. (2002). Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 733-783. doi: 10.1086/342055.
- Castro, D., & Félix, G. (2010). Apertura comercial, relocalización espacial y salario regional en México. Estudios Fronterizos, Nueva Época, 11(21), 43-79.
- Castro L. D., & Huesca Reynoso, L. (2007). Wage inequality in México: a review. Papeles de Población, 13(54), 225-264.
- Chiquiar, D. (2008). Globalization, regional wage differentials and the Stolper-Samuelson theorem: evidence from Mexico. Journal of International Economics, 74(1), 70-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.05.009.
- Combes, P. P., Duranton, G., & Gobillon, L. (2008). Spatial wage disparities: sorting matters! Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 723-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.004.
- Cowell, & Frank A. (2011). Measuring inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Esquivel, G., & Rodríguez-López, J. A. (2003). Technology, trade, and wage inequality in Mexico before and after NAFTA. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 543-565. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00119-6.
- Hanson, G. H. (1997). Increasing returns, trade and the regional structure of wages. Economic Journal, 107(440), 113-133. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00145.
- Hanson, G. H., & Harrison, A. (1995). Trade, technology, and wage inequality. NBER Working Paper Series, 5110. doi: 10.3386/w5110.
- Hicks, J. R. (1963). The theory of wages. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Juhn, C., Murphy, K. M., & Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 410-442. doi: 10.1086/261881.
- INEGI (2009). Censos Económicos. Aguascalientes.
- INEGI (2014). Censos Económicos. Aguascalientes.
- Kim, T.-H., & Muller, C. (2004). Two-stage quantile regression when the first stage is based on quantile regression. Econometrics Journal, 7(1), 218-231. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2004.00128.x.
- Kopczewska, K. (2021). Applied spatial statistics and econometrics: data analysis in R. Routledge.
- Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28. doi: 10.2307/2220605.
- Liao, W. C., & Wang, X. (2012). Hedonic house prices and spatial quantile regression. Journal of Housing Economics, 21(1), 16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2011.11.001.
- Malkina, M. (2019). Spatial wage inequality and its sectoral determinants: the case of modern Russia. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1), 69-87. doi: 10.24136/oc.2019.004.
- Mazol, A. (2016). Spatial wage inequality in Belarus. Free Network Policy Brief Series, October. Retrieved from https://freepolicybriefs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FREEPolicyBrief_Oct10.pdf.
- McMillen, D. P. (2013). Quantile regression for spatial data. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31815-3.
- Minnesota Population Center (2020). Integrated public use microdata series, international: Version 7.3 [dataset]. Minnesota Population Center. doi: 10.18128/D020.V7.3.
- Mungaray, A., & Burgos, B. (2009). Apertura externa, inequidad salarial y calificación laboral en México, 1984-2002. Problemas Del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, 39(152), 122-145. doi: 10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2008.152.7705.
- Pérez-Cervantes, F. (2016). Insurance against local productivity shocks: evidence from commuters in Mexico. Documentos de Investigación, 2016-19.
- SEDATU, CONAPO, & INEGI (2018). Delimitación de las zonas metropolitanas de México 2015 (1st ed.).
- Senftleben-Koenig, C., & Wielandt, H. (2014). Spatial wage inequality and technological change. Humboldt University Discussion Papers, 649.
- Stolper, W. F., & Samuelson, P. A. (1941). Protection and real wages. Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), 58-73. doi: 10.2307/2967638.
- Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 46, 234-240. doi: 10.1126/science.11.277.620.
- Topel, R. H. (1994). Regional labor markets and the determinants of wage inequality. American Economic Review, 84(2), 17-22. doi: 10.2307/2117794.
- Verhoogen, E. A. (2008). Trade, quality upgrading, and wage inequality in the mexican manufacturing sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 489-530. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.489.
- Wang, J., & Xu, J. (2015). Home market effect, spatial wages disparity: an empirical reinvestigation of China. Annals of Regional Science, 55(2-3), 313-333. doi: 10.1007/s00168-015-0700-2.
- Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: a description of the patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4), 1-84.
- Wood, A. (1997). Openness and wage inequality in developing countries: the Latin American challenge to East Asian conventional wisdom. World Bank Economic Review, 11(1), 33-57. doi: 10.1093/wber/11.1.33.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171655696