From Nationalism to Educational Divide? Party Positions and Voters' Profiles on Welfare State Issues in Estonia and Latvia in the 2010s

• Autorzy: Triin Lauri , Anu Toots
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper studies electoral dynamics in Estonia and Latvia in the years 2011-2019 by juxtaposing political supply with political demand in the welfare state issue. The article contributes to the theory of two-dimensional policy space, which has been widely studied in the context of mature welfare states. We show, using Estonia and Latvia as examples, that this framework can be extended to explain electoral dynamics in contemporary post-communist Eastern Europe. Empirically, we found that despite the temporary prominence of the distributional divide, the socio-cultural dimension has preserved its dominance in political supply and demand. While distinctive voters' profiles are detectable in both countries, stable party constituencies are not formed behind those divisions and the strongest predictor that distinguishes voters is the level of education. Thus, the strong legacy of the socio-cultural cleavage in combination with renewed saliency of immigration and EU integration issues still constrains Estonian and Latvian party politics. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Polityka kosmiczna; Analiza klas ukrytych

EN

Space policy; Latent class analysis

• Czasopismo: Problemy Polityki Społecznej
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 57
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 139-175

Twórcy

autor

Triin Lauri

• Tallinn University, Estonia

autor

Anu Toots

• Tallinn University, Estonia

Bibliografia

• Abou-Chadi, T. & Wagner, M. (2019). The Electoral Appeal of Party Strategies in Postindustrial Societies: When Can the Mainstream Left Succeed? Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1405-1419. https://doi.org/10.1086/704436.
• Abou-Chadi, T., Mitteregger, R. & Mudde, C. (2021). Left behind by the working class? Social democracy's electoral crisis and the rise of the radical right. Friedrich-Ebert- Stiftung. Abteilung Analyse, Planung und Beratung. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/ eprint/207180/.
• Ansell, B. & Gingrich, J. (2021). The End of Human Capital Solidarity? In F. McCall Rosenbluth, and M. Weir (eds.), Who Gets What? The new Politics of Insecurity, Cambridge University Press, 52-78.
• Attewell, D. (2021). Redistribution attitudes and vote choice across the educational divide. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12486.
• Avlijaš, S. (2020). Beyond Neoliberalism? Revisiting the Welfare State in the Baltic States. Europe-Asia Studies, 72(4), 614-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.201 9.1709622.
• Bakker, R., & Hobolt, S. (2013). Measuring Party Positions. In G. Evans and N.D. de Graaf (eds.), Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross National Perspective, Oxford University Press, 27-45.
• Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H. & Kriesi, H. (2015). The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge University Press.
• Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe's periphery. Cornell University Press.
• Bruzelius, C. & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2018). European citizenship and social rights. In S. Seubert, M. Hoogenboom, T. Knijn, S.A. de Vries and F. van Waarden (eds.), Moving Beyond Barriers: Prospects for EU Citizenship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Busemeyer, M.R., Rathgeb, P. & Sahm, A.H.J. (2021). Authoritarian values and the welfare state: the social policy preferences of radical right voters. West European Politics, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1886497.
• De Vries, C.E. & Marks, G. (2012). The struggle over dimensionality: A note on theory and empirics, European Union Politics, 13(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511435712.
• Ehin, P., Saarts, T. & Jakobson, M.L. (2020) Estonia. In V. Hloušek and P. Kaniok P. (eds.), The European Parliament Election of 2019 in East-Central Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40858-9_5.
• Evans, G. & Lipsmeyer, C.S. (2001). The Democratic Experience in Divided Societies: the Baltic States in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Baltic Studies, 32(4), 379-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770100000161.
• Evans, G. & Whitefield, S. (1993). Identifying the Bases for Party Competition in Eastern Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 521-548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006712.
• Gethin, A., Martínez-Toledano, C. & Piketty, T. (2021). Brahmin Left versus Merchant Right: Changing Political Cleavages in 21 Western Democracies, 1948-2020. https://datascience.iq.harvard.edu/files/pegroup/files/gethin_et_al_brahmin_left_ merchant_right_01.pdf
• Gingrich, J. & Häusermann, S. (2015): The decline of the working class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(1), 50-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714556970.
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2007). The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe. Political Studies, 55(3), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
• Greskovits, B. (2007). Is East-Central Europe Backsliding? Economic Woes and Political Disaffection. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 40-46. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/223233.
• Greve, B. (2020). Welfare populism and welfare chauvinism. Policy Press.
• Halikiopoulou, D. & Vlandas, T. (2020). When economic and cultural interests align: the anti-immigration voter coalitions driving far right party success in Europe. European Political Science Review, 12(4), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577392000020X.
• Häusermann, S. & Kriesi, H.P. (2015). What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice. In P. Beramendi et al. (eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, 202-230.
• Häusermann, S., Picot, G. & Geering, D. (2013). Review Article: Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State - Recent Advances in the Literature. British Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000336.
• Häusermann, S., Pinggera, M, Ares, M. & Enggist, M. (2021). Class and social policy in the knowledge economy. European Journal of Political Research, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12463.
• Hobolt, S.B. & De Vries, C.E. (2015). Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1159-1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0010414015575030.
• Hobolt, S.B. & Tilley, J. (2016). Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis, West European Politics, 39(5), 971-991. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1181871.
• Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2017). Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279.
• Kalmus, V., Lauristin, M., Opermann, S. & Vihalemm, T. (2020). Researching Estonian Transformation: Morphogenetic Reflections. University of Tartu Press.
• Kitschelt, H. (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
• Kitschelt, H. & Rehm, P. (2018). Determinants of Dimension Dominance. In P. Manow, B. Palier and H. Schwander (eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
• Kostelka, F. & Rovny, J. (2019). It's Not the Left: Ideology and Protest Participation in Old and New Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 52(11), 1677-1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830717
• Mair, P. (1989). The Problem of Party System Change. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1(3), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692889001003001.
• Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M. & Edwards, E. (2006). Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West Different Structure, Same Causality. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005281932
• Manow, P., Palier, B. & Schwander, H. (eds) (2018). Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
• Moniz, P. & Wlezien, C. (2020). Issue Salience and Political Decisions. Oxford Research Encylopedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1361
• Morgan, K.J. (2018). Varieties of Electoral Dilemmas: Partisan Jousting over Welfare States and Immigration in a Changing Europe. In P. Manow, B. Palier and H. Schwander (eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
• Norkus, Z. (2011). Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian post-communist development in the comparative perspective. In Baltic way(s) of human development: twenty years on. Eesti Koostöö Kogu, 22-30. https://kogu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/eia_eng_2011.pdf
• Mudde, C. (2019). The Far Right Today. Polity Press.
• Oberski, D. (2016). Mixture Models: Latent Profile and Latent Class Analysis. In D. Robertson and M. Kaptein (eds.), Modern Statistical Methods for HCI. Springer International Publishing, 275-287.
• Pierson, P. (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press.
• Rathgeb. P. & Busemeyer, M.R. (2021). How to study the populist radical right and the welfare state? West European Politics, 45(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01402382.2021.1925421.
• Rehm, P., Hacker, J.S. & Schlesinger, M. (2012). Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State. American Political Science Review, 106(2), 386-406. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0003055412000147.
• Rohrschneider, R.; Schmitt-Beck, R. & Jung, F. (2012). Short-term factors versus long-term values: Explaining the 2009 election results. Electoral Studies, 31(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.006.
• Rohrschneider, R. & Whitefiled, S. (2010). Consistent choice sets? The stances of political parties towards European integration in ten Central East European democracies, 2003-2007. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 55-75, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903464903.
• Roosma, F. & van Oorschot, W. (2017). The social legitimacy of welfare states in European regions and countries: balancing between popular preferences and evaluations. In P. Kennett and N. Lendvai-Bainton (eds.), Handbook of European Social Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Rovny, J. (2014). Communism, Federalism, and Ethnic Minorities: Explaining Party Competition Patterns in Eastern Europe. World Politics, 66(4), 669-708. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0043887114000227.
• Rovny, J. (2015). Party Competition Structure in Eastern Europe: Aggregate Uniformity versus Idiosyncratic Diversity? East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 29(1), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414567535.
• Rovny, J. & Whitefiled, S. (2019). Issue dimensionality and party competition in turbulent times. Party Politics, 25(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818816970.
• Rueda, D. (2007) Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford University Press.
• Saarts, T. (2011). Comparative Party System Analysis in Central and Eastern Europe: the Case of the Baltic States. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 3(3), 83-104. http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/86
• Saarts, T. (2016). The ethnic-colonial communist legacy and the formation of the Estonian and Latvian Party systems. Trames, 20(70/65), 2, 115-143. https://kirj.ee/public/trames_pdf/2016/issue_2/Trames-2016-2-115-143.pdf
• Saarts, T. & Saar, E. (2021). When the Ethnic Cleavage Overshadows the Class Cleavage in a Post-Communist Country and Why We Should Care? European Politics and Society, 23(2), 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1858397.
• Stefanovic, D. & Evans, G. (2019). Multiple Winning Formulae? Far Right Voters and Parties in Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(9), 1443-1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1653447.
• Tavits, M. & Letki, N. (2013). From Values to Interests? The Evolution of Party Competition in New Democracies. The Journal of Politics, 76(1), 246-258. https://doi. org/10.1017/S002238161300131X.
• Toots, A. (2022). Social Governance Reforms in a Quasi-Bismarckian Welfare State: How Estonia Moved from Tripartism to Direct State Management. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 14(1): http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/ view/906.
• Toots, A. & Lauri, T. (2022). Nation (re)building through social investment: The Baltic reform trajectories. In J.L. Garritzmann, S. Häusermann and B. Palier (eds.), The World Politics of Social Investment Volume II: The Politics of Varying Social Investment Strategies. Oxford University Press.
• Tucker, J.A. (2015). Comparative Opportunities: The Evolving Study of Political Behavior in Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 29(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414559051.
• Van Oorschot, W. (2010) Public perceptions of the economic, moral, social and migration consequences of the welfare state: an empirical analysis of welfare state legitimacy. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(1), 19-31. https://doi. org/10.1177/0958928709352538
• Volkens, A.; Lehmann, P.; Matthieß, T.; Merz, N.; Regel, S. & Weßels, B. (2017). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2017b. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.31971/pps/152005