The Role of Sustainable Consumption and Green Marketing in Consumers' Purchase Decisions in the SMART Era

Warianty tytułu

Zrównoważona konsumpcja i rola green marketing w decyzjach zakupowych konsumentów ery SMART

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Cel: wraz z rosnącymi obawami o środowisko pojawiła się potrzeba uczynienia konsumpcji bardziej przyjazną dla natury. Świadomość niebezpieczeństwa związanego z nadmiernym konsumpcjonizmem skłoniła część społeczeństwa do bardziej zrównoważonych wyborów. Głównym celem prezentowanego badania była ocena wpływu obecności czynników proekologicznych w marketingu mix na decyzje zakupowe młodych konsumentów. Metodologia: zbadano chęć zakupu produktu "ekologicznego" w przypadku, gdy jest w tej samej cenie lub droższy od porównywalnych produktów. W badaniu wykorzystano metodę pośredniego komunikowania się z respondentami za pomocą ankiety internetowej, przeprowadzonej w grupach wiekowych 18-24 i 25-34 lata. Wyniki: wyniki wskazują, że czynniki proekologiczne odgrywają ważną rolę w podejmowaniu decyzji zakupowych młodych konsumentów. Jednak, pomimo obaw o środowisko, dla wielu kluczowym czynnikiem jest wciąż cena. Ograniczenia/implikacje badawcze: badanie zostało przeprowadzone na grupie młodych konsumentów, zatem na następnym etapie podobny kwestionariusz ankiety mógłby zostać wypełniony przez respondentów ze starszych grup wiekowych, aby uzyskać bardziej kompletne wyniki dla polskiego rynku. Oryginalność/wartość: wyniki potwierdzają znaczenie elementu "eko" w marketingu na polskim rynku. Ustalenia dotyczące zachowań zakupowych polskich konsumentów mogą być wskazówką dla firm działających w kraju. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Purpose: Along with the growing environmental concerns, the need to make the consumption more eco-friendly has emerged. The awareness of the danger related to excessive consumerism pushed some part of the society towards more sustainable choices. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of pro-ecological factors in the marketing mix on the young consumers' purchase decisions. Design/methodology/approach: The research investigated the willingness to purchase a product described as "ecological" in a situation when its price is the same or higher (price premium) when compared to the price of other products. The quantitative research in the form of indirect data collection with the use of online survey has been carried out in the age groups of 18-24 and 25-34. Findings: The results indicate that pro-environmental factors play an important role for those consumers in their purchase decisions. However, despite the ecological concerns, price is still a crucial factor for many. Research limitations/implications: The research has been carried out in the group of young consumers; therefore, a similar questionnaire could be distributed among respondents from older age groups to gather a more extensive view of the market. Originality/value: The results confirm the importance of the "eco" factor in marketing on the Polish market. The findings regarding the purchase behaviours of Polish consumers might serve as a guidance for companies operating on the market.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Konsumpcja zrównoważona; Decyzje konsumenckie

EN

Sustainable consumption; Consumer decision

• Czasopismo: Problemy Zarządzania
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 20
• Numer: nr 2 (96)
• Strony: 215-235

Twórcy

Bibliografia

• Acquisti, A., & Spiekermann, S. (2011). Do interruptions pay off? Effects of interruptive ads on consumers' willingness to pay. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(4), 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.04.003.
• Adamik, A., & Sikora-Fernandez, D. (2021). Smart organizations as a source of competitiveness and sustainable development in the age of Industry 4.0: Integration of micro and macro perspective. Energies, 14(6), 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061572.
• Albino, V., Balice, A., & Dangelico, R. M. (2009). Environmental strategies and green product development: An overview on sustainability-driven companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.638.
• Amini, M., & Bienstock, C. C. (2014). Corporate sustainability: An integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.016.
• Ansar, N. (2013). Impact of green marketing on consumer purchase intention. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(11), 650-655. https://doi.org/10.5901/ mjss.2013.v4n11p650.
• Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z.
• Belz, F. M., & Peattie, K. (2009). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. Wiley & Sons.
• Bielawska, K., & Grębosz-Krawczyk, M. (2021). Consumers' choice behaviour toward green clothing. European Research Studies Journal, XXIV(2), 238-256. https://doi. org/10.35808/ersj/2124.
• Bleda, M., & Valente, M. (2008). Graded eco-labels: A demand-oriented approach to reduce pollution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 512-524. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.003.
• Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate community contributions in the United Kingdom and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(1), 15-26. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-004-3236-4.
• Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10551-010-0640-9.
• Călin, I. E., Pârgaru, I., & Neacşu, M. (2015). The role of smart organisation in socio- economic environment. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, 6, 41-47.
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.
• Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers' perspective. Management Science and Engineering, 4(2), 27-39.
• Costanza, R., Cumberland, J. H., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., & Franco, C. (2014). An introduction to ecological economics (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17829.
• Cowan, K., & Kinley, T. (2014). Green spirit: Consumer empathies for green apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(5), 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ijcs.12125.
• Cronin Jr., J., Smith, J. S., Gleim, M. R., Ramirez, E., & Martinez, J. D. (2011). Green marketing strategies: An examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 158-174. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11747-010-0227-0.
• D'Souza, C., Taghian, M., & Lamb, P. (2006). An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(2), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610661697.
• Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0.
• Dean, T. J., & Pacheco, D. F. (2014). Green marketing: A strategic balancing act for creating value. Journal of Business Strategy, 35, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS- 11-2013-0109.
• Du, S., Bhattachrya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.01.001.
• Eisend, M., & Tarrahi F. (2016). The effectiveness of advertising: A meta-meta-analysis of advertising inputs and outcomes. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 519-531. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1185981.
• Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51. https://doi. org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106.
• Fraccascia, L., Giannoccaro, I., & Albino, V. (2018). Green product development: What does the country product space imply? Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1076-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.190.
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Stakeholder management: Framework and philosophy. Pitman.
• Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, identity and proenvironmental behavior. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 374-392. https://doi.org /10.1080/21582041.2012.682086.
• Gleim, M., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin Jr., J. (2013). Against the green: A multi- method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001.
• Hahnel, U. J., Gölz, S., & Spada, H. (2014). How does green suit me? Consumers mentally match perceived product attributes with their domain-specific motives when making green purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1471.
• Hamzah, M. I., & Tanwir, N. S. (2021). Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123643.
• Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., & Konecnik Ruzzier, M. (2019). Transition towards sustainability: Adoption of eco-products among consumers. Sustainability, 11, 4308. https://doi. org/10.3390/su11164308.
• Jaiswal, D., & Kant, R. (2018). Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008.
• Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1/2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001.
• Kao, T.-F. (2019). A study on the influence of green advertising design and environmental emotion on advertising effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118294.
• Katrandjiev, H. (2016). Ecological marketing, green marketing, sustainable marketing: Synonyms or on evolution of ideas? Economic Alternatives, 1, 71-82.
• Khan, E. A., Dewan, M. N., & Chowdhury, M. H. (2016). Reflective or formative measurement model of sustainability factor: A three industry comparison. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i2p9.
• Khojastehpour, M., & Riad Shams, S. M. (2020). Addressing the complexity of stakeholder management in international ecological setting: A CSR approach. Journal of Business Research, 119, 302-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.012.
• Kumar, P., & Ghodeswar, B. M. (2015). Factors affecting consumers' green product purchase decisions. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 33(3), 330-347. https://doi. org/10.1108/MIP-03-2014-0068.
• Lavorata, L. (2014). Influence of retailers' commitment to sustainable development on store image, consumer loyalty and consumer boycotts: Proposal for a model using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(6), 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.003.
• Lee, N., & Kotler, Ph. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Wiley.
• Lee, S., & Trimi, S. (2018). Innovation for creating a smart future. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.11.001.
• Leire, C., & Thidell, A. (2005). Product-related environmental information to guide consumer purchases - A review and analysis of research on perceptions, understanding and use among Nordic consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.12.004.
• Liao, Y.-K., Wu, W.-Y., & Pham, T.-T. (2020). Examining the moderating effects of green marketing and green psychological benefits on customers' green attitude, value and purchase intention. Sustainability, 12, 7461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187461.
• Lombart, C., & Louis, D. (2014). A study of the impact of corporate social responsibility and price image on retailer personality and consumers' reactions (satisfaction, trust and loyalty to the retailer). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 630-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.009.
• Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jii.2017.04.005.
• Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005.
• Mahmoud, T. O. (2018). Impact of green marketing mix on purchase intention. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, 5(2), 127-135. https://doi. org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.02.020.
• Memery, J., Megicks, P., & Williams, J. (2005). Ethical and social responsibility issues in grocery shopping: A preliminary typology. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510619760.
• Mihalache (Maican), S. (2011). CSR - a marketing tool? Annals of "Spiru Haret" University: Economic Series, 2(1), 159-164.
• Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006214509281.
• Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1-27. https://doi. org/10.14448/jes.01.0002.
• Moser, A. K. (2016). Consumers' purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: An empirical analysis of German consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.05.006.
• Murali, K., Lim, M. K., & Petruzzi, N. C. (2018). The effects of ecolabels and environmental regulation on green product development. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(3), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0703.
• Nam, C., Dong, H., & Lee, Y. A. (2017). Factors influencing consumers' purchase intention of green sportswear. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40691-017-0091-3.
• Narula, S. A., & Desore, A. (2016). Framing green consumer behaviour research: Opportunities and challenges. Social Responsibility Journal, 12, 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2014-0112.
• Nasiri, M., Rantala, T., Saunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantanen, H. (2018). Transition towards sustainable solutions: Product, service, technology, and business model. Sustainability, 10(2), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020358.
• Nawel, A., & Lapeyre, A. (2016). Consumer purchase intentions for green products: Mediating role of WTP and moderating effects of framing. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(4), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2014.888574.
• Nikolaou, I. E., Tsalis, T. A., & Evangelinos, K. I. (2019). A framework to measure corporate sustainability performance: A strong sustainability-based view of firm. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. spc.2018.10.004.
• do Paço, A., Alves, H., Shiel, C., & Filho, W.L. (2014). An analysis of the measurement of the construct "buying behaviour" in green marketing. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2014.894082.
• Paul, J., & Rana, J. (2012). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(6), 412-422. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 07363761211259223.
• Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006.
• Peattie, K. (2001). Towards sustainability: The third age of green marketing. Marketing Review, 2(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1362/1469347012569869.
• Peattie, K. (2011). Towards sustainability: Achieving marketing transformation - a retrospective comment. Social Business, 1(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1362/ 204440811X570581.
• Perez, A., & Rodriguez del Bosque, I. (2015). The formation of customer CSR perceptions in the banking sector. International Journal of Business and Society, 16(1), 75-94.
• Pham, T. H., Nguyen, T. N., Phan, T. T., & Nguyen, N. T. (2019). Evaluating the purchase behaviour of organic food by young consumers in an emerging market economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(6), 540-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/096 5254X.2018.1447984.
• Polonsky, M. J. (2011). Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1311-1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus res.2011.01.016.
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
• Prakash, G., Choudhary, S., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Khan, S. A., & Panda, T. K. (2019). Do altruistic and egoistic values influence consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions towards eco-friendly packaged products? An empirical investigation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jretconser.2019.05.011.
• Punyatoya, P. (2014). Linking environmental awareness and perceived brand eco- friendliness to brand trust and purchase intention. Global Business Review, 15(2), 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914523572.
• Rana, J., & Paul, J. (2017). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004.
• Rashid, N. A. (2009). Awareness of eco-label in Malaysia's green marketing initiative. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(8), 132-141. https://doi. org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n8p132.
• Rego A., Cunha, M. P., & Polónia, D. (2017). Corporate sustainability: A view from the top. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2760-8.
• Sadiq, M., Adil, M., & Paul, J. (2021). An innovation resistance theory perspective on purchase of eco-friendly cosmetics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102369.
• Saeed, M. M., & Arshad, F. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of competitive advantage: The mediating role of social capital and reputational capital. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 19(4), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1057/dbm.2012.19.
• Sanclemente-Téllez, C. (2017). Marketing and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Moving between broadening the concept of marketing and social factors as a marketing strategy. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21, 4-25. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sjme.2017.05.001.
• Saunila, M., Nasiri, M., Ukko, J., & Rantala, T. (2019). Smart technologies and corporate sustainability: The mediation effect of corporate sustainability strategy. Computers in Industry, 108, 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.03.003.
• Schaefer, S. D., Terlutter, R., & Diehl, S. (2020). Talking about CSR matters: Employees' perception of and reaction to their company's CSR communication in four different CSR domains. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 191-212. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02650487.2019.1593736.
• Sheehy, B. (2000). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x.
• Smart Future Initiative. (2016). Retrieved on 22 January 2022 from: https://www.smart- future.net/.
• Steenis, N. D., van der Lans, I. A., van Herpen, E., & van Trijp, H. C. (2018). Effects of sustainable design strategies on consumer preferences for redesigned packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 854-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.09.137.
• Strand, R. (2014). Strategic leadership of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 687-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2017-3.
• Suki, N. M. (2013). Green awareness effects on consumers' purchasing decision: Some insights from Malaysia. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 9, 49-63.
• Tseng, S. C., & Hung, S. W. (2013). A framework identifying the gaps between customers' expectations and their perceptions in green products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.050.
• Verma, V. K., Chandra, B., & Kumar, S. (2019). Values and ascribed responsibility to predict consumers' attitude and concern towards green hotel visit intention. Journal of Business Research, 96, 206-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.021.
• Weisstein, L. F., Asgari, M., & Siew, S. W. (2014). Price presentation effects on green purchase intentions. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 23(3), 230-239. https:// doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2013-0324.
• Wijayaningtyas, M., Handoko. F., & Hidayat, S. (2019). The millennials' perceived behavioural control on an ecofriendly house purchase intention. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1375(1), 012060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012060.
• Yadav, R. (2016). Altruistic or egoistic: Which value promotes organic food consumption among young consumers? A study in the context of a developing nation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jretconser.2016.08.008.
• Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite, 96, 122-128. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.017.
• Yue, B., Sheng, G., She, S., & Xu, J. (2020). Impact of consumer environmental responsibility on green consumption behavior in China: The role of environmental concern and price sensitivity. Sustainability, 12(5), 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12052074.
• Yusof, J. M., Kaur Singh, G., & Razak, R. A. (2013). Purchase intention of environment- friendly automobile. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.369.
• Zou, L. W., & Chan, R. Y. (2019). Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Research, 94, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.006.
• Zwetsloot, G. I. (2003). From management systems to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023303917699.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.96.11