Green Competences and Responsible Innovation - Exploring the Reciprocity of Concepts Relationship

• Autorzy: Agata Sudolska

Warianty tytułu

Koncepcje zielonych kompetencji i odpowiedzialnych innowacji - w poszukiwaniu wzajemności relacji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Cel: eksploracja relacji między koncepcją zielonych kompetencji (GCs) a orientacją przedsiębiorstwa na odpowiedzialne innowacje (RI). Metodologia: rozważania zawarte w artykule oparto na studiach literatury o charakterze integracyjnym. Wyniki: na podstawie przeprowadzonych studiów literatury ustalono, że istnieje dynamiczny, wzajemny związek między zielonymi kompetencjami przyswojonymi przez członków organizacji a jej orientacją na odpowiedzialne innowacje oraz przedstawiono szereg propozycji kierunków badawczych w obszarze zarządzania innowacjami. Oznacza to, że GCs zdobywane przez członków organizacji przyczyniają się do rozwoju orientacji przedsiębiorstwa na RI, a także, że orientacja firmy na RI ma wpływ na wzrost GC wśród menedżerów i pracowników firmy. Przeprowadzony przegląd literatury pozwolił na zaproponowanie pięciu propozycji dotyczących badania relacji między GCs a RI. Ograniczenia/implikacje badawcze: autorka artykułu zdaje sobie sprawę z ograniczeń prowadzonych badań. Po pierwsze, pojęcia GC i RI są bardzo szerokie, zdefiniowane i wyjaśnione w literaturze na wiele różnych sposobów. To sprawia, że trudno je opisać i ocenić w sposób jednoznaczny. Ze względu na ilość publikacji niezbędnych do studiowania w zakresie koncepcji zielonych kompetencji i odpowiedzialnych innowacji, przeprowadzone badania należy traktować jako wstępny etap dalszych analiz. Co więcej, ponieważ badanie jest ograniczone przez reinterpretację istniejących badań, potrzebne są dalsze badania empiryczne w celu przetestowania pięciu propozycji. Wreszcie, ze względu na bardzo dynamiczny rozwój pola badawczego, statyczna, jednorazowa analiza wydaje się niewystarczająca. W związku z powyższym, rekomenduje się powtórzenie badania w przyszłości, aby obserwować zmieniające się trendy i przesunięcia w polu badawczym w czasie. Oryginalność/wartość: na podstawie propozycji dotyczących relacji między koncepcjami GCs i RI można zbudować kilka modeli do analizy wpływu GCs członków organizacji na orientację przedsiębiorstwa na RI, a także wpływu orientacji firmy na RI na poziom GCs zdobywanych przez menedżerów i pracowników. Przyszłe kierunki badań odnoszą się głównie do operacjonalizacji wymiarów RI oraz orientacji firmy na RI. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to investigate the relation between two novel management concepts: Green Competences (GCs) and Responsible Innovation (RI). Design/methodology/approach: The research is based on an integrative literature review. Findings: The research based on extensive literature studies confirms that the relationship between managers' and employees' GCs and a firm's RI orientation is dynamic and reciprocal. This means that GCs acquired by organization members contribute to the development of a firm's RI orientation and also that a company's RI orientation has an impact on the increase of GCs among managers and employees in a firm. The conducted literature review enabled formulating five propositions regarding the relationship between GCs and RI. Research limitations/implications: The author of the article is aware of the limitations of the conducted research. First, the concepts of GCs as well as RI are very broad, defined and explained in the literature in numerous different ways. This makes them difficult to describe and assess with certainty. Due to the number of publications necessary to study in regard to the concepts of green competences and responsible innovations, the conducted studies should be treated as an initial stage for further analyses. Moreover, as the study is restricted by the re-interpretation of existing research, further empirical research is needed to test the five propositions. Finally, due to a very dynamic development of the research field, a static, one-time analysis seems to be insufficient. Therefore, the replication of the study in the future is recommended to observe changing trends and shifts in the research field over time. Originality/value: Based on the propositions regarding the relations between the GC and RI concepts, several models can be built to analyze the impact of organization members' GCs on a company's orientation towards RI as well as the impact of a firm's RI orientation on the level of GCs acquired by managers and employees. Future research pathways refer mainly to the operationalization of the RI dimensions as well as a firm's RI orientation. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarządzanie innowacjami; Innowacje w organizacji; Odpowiedzialność; Ekoinnowacje

EN

Innovation management; Innovations in organization; Responsibility; Eco-innovation

• Czasopismo: Problemy Zarządzania
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 20
• Numer: nr 2 (96)
• Strony: 156-175

Twórcy

autor

Agata Sudolska

• Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland

Bibliografia

• Aboelmaged, M., & Hashem, G. (2019). Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 853-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.150.
• Adamik, A., & Sikora-Fernandez, D. (2021). Smart organizations as a source of competitiveness and sustainable development in the age of industry 4.0: Integration of micro and macro perspective. Energies, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061572.
• Adhikari, A., Biswas, I., & Avittathur, B. (2016). Green retailing: A new paradigm in supply chain management. In N. Kamath & S. Saurav (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic supply chain management in the retail industry (pp. 290-308). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9894-9.ch016.
• Allen, S., Cunliffe, A. L., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2019). Understanding sustainability through the lens of ecocentric radical-reflexivity: Implications for management education. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3420-3.
• Alvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2018). Assessing environmental competencies of primary education pre-service teachers in Spain: A comparative study between two universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2016-0227.
• Baeshen, Y., Soomro, Y. A., & Bhutto, M. Y. (2021, November). Determinants of green innovation to achieve sustainable business performance: Evidence from SMEs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767968.
• Blok, V., Hoffmans, L., & Wubben, E. F. M. (2015). Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: Critical issues and management practices. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.3920/ JCNS2015.x003.
• Bobola, A., Ozimek, I., & Szlachciuk, J. (2018). Social and integrated reports of food business as tools of CSR and sustainable development. Problemy Zarzadzania, 16(3(75)), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.75.6.
• Borland, H., Ambrosini, V., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2016). Building theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2471-6.
• Brown, M. (2013). The development of green skills through the local TAFE Institute as a potential pathway to regional development. International Journal of Training Research, 11(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijtr.2013.11.1.27.
• Brown, M. (2015). Developing and using green skills for the transition to a low carbon economy. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(2), 180-201.
• Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2005). The spirit of entrepreneurship and the qualities of moral decision making: Toward a unifying framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0137-0.
• Burget, M., Bardone, E., & Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: A literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1.
• Cabral, C., & Dhar, R. L. (2019, June). Green competencies: Construct development and measurement validation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 887-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.014.
• Cabral, C., & Dhar, R. L. (2021). Green competencies: Insights and recommendations from a systematic literature review. Benchmarking, 28(1), 66-105. https://doi. org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0489.
• Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x.
• Corral-Verdugo, V. (2002). A structural model of proenvironmental competency. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/00116502034004008.
• Covello, C., & Iatridis, K. (2020). On the challenges and drivers of implementing responsible innovation in foodpreneurial SMEs. In E. Yaghmaei & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Assessment of Responsible Innovation (pp. 98-116). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298998-7.
• Czakon, W. (2019). Walidacja narzędzia pomiarowego w naukach o zarządzaniu. Przeglqd Organizacji, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2019.04.01.
• Dlimbetova, G., Aliyeva, A., & Ayazbayeva, A. (2015). Development of ecological competence for future professions. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 12(1), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/1667.
• Dlimbetova, G., Zhylbaev, Z., Syrymbetova, L., & Aliyeva, A. (2016). Green skills for green economy: Case of the environmental education role in Kazakhstan's economy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1735-1742. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.550a.
• Dzhengiz, T., & Niesten, E. (2020). Competences for environmental sustainability: A systematic review on the impact of absorptive capacity and capabilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 881-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04360-z.
• Fraijo-Sing, B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & González-Lomelí, D. (2013). Promoting pro-environmental competency. In V. Corral-verdugo, C. H. Garcia-Cadena, & M. Frias-Armenta (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability (pp. 225-246). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
• Fryxell, G. E., & Lo, C. W. H. (2003). The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of the environment: An empirical examination of managers in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024773012398.
• Gerhart, B. (2005). Human resources and business performance: Findings, unanswered questions, and an alternative approach. Management Revue, 16(2), 174-185.
• Giannoni, C., Alarcón, L. F., & Vera, S. (2018). Diagnosis of sustainable business strategies implemented by Chilean construction companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010082.
• Gluch, P., Gustafsson, M., & Thuvander, L. (2009). An absorptive capacity model for green innovation and performance in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 27(5), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902896645.
• Green skills and environmental awareness in vocational education and training. Synthesis report. (2012). https://doi.org/10.2801/78825.
• Greener skills and jobs. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208704-en.
• Gurzawska, A., Mäkinen, M., & Brey, P. (2017). Implementation of responsible research and innovation (RRI) practices in industry: Providing the right incentives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101759.
• He, X., & Liu, Y. (2018). The public environmental awareness and the air pollution effect in Chinese stock market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.294.
• Hemphill, T. A. (2014). Responsible innovation and patent assertion entities. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(3), 314-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.96 3003.
• Hesselbarth, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Educating change agents for sustainability - Learnings from the first sustainability management master of business administration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.042.
• van den Hoven, J., Klaus, J., Nielsen, L., Roure, F., Rudze, L., Stilgoe, J., ..., & Riera, C. M. (2013). Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/46253.
• Ifeoma, O. R., Purity, N.-O., & Okoye-Nebo, C. (2015). Effective talent management: Key to organisational success. Journal of Policy and Development Studies, 9(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.12816/0011209.
• Islam, T., Khan, M. M., Ahmed, I., & Mahmood, K. (2020). Promoting in-role and extra-role green behavior through ethical leadership: mediating role of green HRM and moderating role of individual green values. International Journal of Manpower, 42(6), 1102-1123. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2020-0036.
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401.
• Kupper, F., Klaassen, P., Rijnen, M., Vermeulen, S., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2015). Report on the quality criteria of Good Practice Standards in RRI. Deliverable D1.3. RRI Tools Project. In RRI Tools. Retrieved from http://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10182/18424/D1.3_QualityCriteriaGoodPracticeStandards.pdf/f7a1d707-5e54-48cb- 949b-053dc7c6f36f.
• Laasch, O., & Conaway, R. N. (2015). Principles of responsible management: Global sustainability, responsibility, and ethics (1st ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Lahneman, B. (2015). In vino veritas: Understanding sustainability with environmental certified management standards. Organization and Environment, 28(2), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615578008.
• Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(6), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902839.
• Lee, M.-H., Lin, C., Lin, C.-K., & Lu, W.-Y. (2014). Moderating effect of institutional responsiveness on the relationship between green leadership and green competitiveness. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal, 42(9), 1483-1494. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.9.1483.
• Lee, R., & Petts, J. (2013). Adaptive governance for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. R. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 143-164). https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch8.
• Leone, M. I., & Belingheri, P. (2017). The relevance of innovation for ethics, responsibility and sustainability. Industry and Innovation, 24(5), 437-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 3662716.2017.1310036.
• Long, T. B., Blok, V., Dorrestijn, S., & Macnaghten, P. (2020). The design and testing of a tool for developing responsible innovation in start-up enterprises. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1608785.
• Long, T. B., Iñigo, E., & Blok, V. (2020). Responsible management of innovation in business. In O. Laasch, E. Freeman, & D. Jamali (Eds.), Research handbook of responsible management (pp. 606-623). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971966.00051.
• Lozano, R. (2006). Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: Breaking through barriers to change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 787-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.010.
• Lubberink, R., Blok, V., Ophem, J. van, & Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: A systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050721.
• Macnaghten, P., Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Wynne, B., Azevedo, A., de Campos, A., ..., & Velho, L. (2014). Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(2), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.108 0/23299460.2014.922249.
• Noorman, M., Swierstra, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2017). Questioning the normative core of RI: The challenges posed to stakeholder engagement in a corporate setting. In L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible innovation 3: A European agenda? (pp. 231-249). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_13.
• Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575773.
• Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Employee green behaviors. In S. E. Jackson, D. S. Ones, & S. Dilchert (Eds.), Managing human resources for environmental sustainability (pp. 85-116). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
• Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. R. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 27-50). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch2.
• Pace, L. A. (2016). How do tourism firms innovate for sustainable energy consumption? A capabilities perspective on the adoption of energy efficiency in tourism accommodation establishments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 111, 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.01.095.
• Papagiannakis, G., Voudouris, I., & Spyros, L. (2014). The road to sustainability: Exploring the process of corporate environmental strategy over time. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 254-271. https://doi.org/0.1002/bse.1781.
• Pedersen, D. M. (1999). Dimensions of environmental competence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0130.
• Peng, X., & Liu, Y. (2016). Behind eco-innovation: Managerial environmental awareness and external resource acquisition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.051.
• Perez-Valls, M., Cespedes-Lorente, J., & Moreno-Garcia, J. (2016). Green practices and organizational design as sources of strategic flexibility and performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 529-544. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1881.
• Pichel, K. (2008). Enhancing ecopreneurship through an environmental management system: A longitudinal analysis of factors leading to proactive employee behaviour. In R. Wüstenhagen, J. Hamschmidt, S. Sharma, & M. Starik (Eds.), Sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 141-196). Elgar, Edward.
• van de Poel, I., Asveld, L., Flipse, S., Klaassen, P., Scholten, V., & Yaghmaei, E. (2017). Company strategies for responsible research and innovation (RRI): A conceptual model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(11), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112045.
• Primc, K., & Cater, T. (2015). Environmental proactivity and firm performance: A fuzzy-set analysis. Management Decision, 53(3), 648-667. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0288.
• Putnik, G., & Cunha, M. M. (2005). Virtual enterprise integration: Technological and organizational perspectives. Virtual Enterprise Integration: Technological and Organizational Perspectives, 454. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-405-7.
• Rajiani, I., Musa, H., & Hardjono, B. (2016). Ability, motivation and opportunity as determinants of green human resources management innovation. Research Journal of Business Management, 10(1-3), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjbm.2016.51.57.
• Ramus, C., & Killmer, A. (2007). Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours - A conceptual framework for employee motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(8), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.504.
• Rome declaration on responsible research and innovation in Europe shaping Europe's digital future. (2014). Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/rome-declaration-responsible-research-and-innovation-europe.
• von Schomberg, R. (2011). Introduction towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. In R. von Schomberg (Ed.), Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields (pp. 7-16). European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/58723.
• von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In R. Owen, J. R. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 51-74). Wiley. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3.
• Shrouf, F., Gong, B., & Ordieres-Meré, J. (2017). Multi-level awareness of energy used in production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2570-2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.019.
• Siguaw, J. A., Simpson, P. M., & Enz, C. A. (2006). Conceptualizing innovation orientation: A framework for study and integration of innovation research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 556-574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00224.x.
• Snyder, H. (2019, July). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2019.07.039.
• Steele, F. (1980). Defining and developing environmental competence. In C. P. Alderfer & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Advances in experimental social processes (pp. 225-244). John Wiley & Sons.
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2013.05.008.
• Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707-719. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2007.0213.
• Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D., Wu, L., & Nath, P. (2016). Green competence framework: Evidence from China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1047394.
• Sudolska, A., Lis, A., & Chodorek, M. (2019). Research profiling for responsible and sustainable innovations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236553.
• Sudolska, A., Lis, A., Furmańska-Maruszak, A., & Górka, J. (2020). Identifying characteristics and manifestations of responsible innovation: towards dynamic capability. In K. Krzakiewicz & S. Cyfert (Eds.), Dynamic capabilities and their strategic dimension. Aspects of imitation and innovation (pp. 106-123). Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu.
• Swierstra, T. (2017). Economic, technological, and socio-epistemological drivers behind RRI. In L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible innovation 3: A European agenda? (pp. 9-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_2.
• The European Green Deal. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjK36-UrLn1AhWBz4sKHUOk AxcQFnoECBgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Finfo%2Fsites%2Fde fault%2Ffiles%2Feuropean-green-deal-communicationen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3iAt60 PzqRy8uwCBRYcut_.
• Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344 84305278283.
• Verhulst, E., & Van Doorsselaer, K. (2015). Development of a hands-on toolkit to support integration of ecodesign in engineering programmes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.083.
• Verkerk, M. J., De Leede, J., & Nijhof, A. H. J. (2001). From responsible management to responsible organizations: The democratic principle for managing organizational ethics. Business and Society Review, 106(4), 353-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00120.
• Vickers, I., & Lyon, F. (2014). Beyond green niches? Growth strategies of environmentally-motivated social enterprises. International Small Business Journal, 32(4), 449-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612457700.
• Wang, Y.-F. (2016). Modeling predictors of restaurant employees' green behavior: Comparison of six attitude-behavior models. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 58, 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.07.007.
• Wu, C., Ding, J.-H., & Chen, P.-S. (2012). The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan's textile and apparel industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 618-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe. 2011.05.023.
• Wu, W., Liu, Y., Chin, T., & Zhu, W. (2018). Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020268.
• Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., & Fawehinmi, O. O. (2020). Green human resource management: A systematic literature review from 2007 to 2019. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(7), 2005-2027. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0438.
• Zareie, B., & Navimipour, N. J. (2016). The impact of electronic environmental knowledge on the environmental behaviors of people. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.025.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.96.8